2019冠状病毒病期间日间医院的临床和功能结果

Núria Estrada-Zambrano, Catarina Martinez-Ferreira, Julio Reyes-Figueroa
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病期间日间医院的临床和功能结果","authors":"Núria Estrada-Zambrano,&nbsp;Catarina Martinez-Ferreira,&nbsp;Julio Reyes-Figueroa","doi":"10.1016/j.rcpeng.2022.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Mental health services have been clearly affected by the pandemic and its restrictions. In our day hospital units users attended on fewer days, group therapy was drastically reduced, the number of users in groups was limited and individual and group teletherapy was initiated. This study evaluates the impact of these changes on clinical and functional outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a descriptive study prospectively comparing two cohorts of users: those admitted and discharged from our day hospitals before or during the pandemic. All users received a multidisciplinary assessment at admission and discharge including clinician and user-rated scales on psychopathology, daily living skills, quality of life and caregiver burdens. Improvement in both groups was compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both cohorts were homogenous at admission. Length of admission was not different for the two groups, but users admitted during the pandemic attended the day hospital on significantly fewer days. Improvement observed in most scales was equivalent in both groups, suggesting a similar evolution of both cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite the reduction in assistance days and group therapeutic interventions no major changes were found in the outcomes of both groups. This study shows that careful adaptations and availability, even in critical situations, can result in equally effective treatments. Further research is essential to determine which of these adaptations should be maintained beyond the pandemic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74702,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)","volume":"54 1","pages":"Pages 5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Day Hospitals in Times of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Núria Estrada-Zambrano,&nbsp;Catarina Martinez-Ferreira,&nbsp;Julio Reyes-Figueroa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcpeng.2022.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Mental health services have been clearly affected by the pandemic and its restrictions. In our day hospital units users attended on fewer days, group therapy was drastically reduced, the number of users in groups was limited and individual and group teletherapy was initiated. This study evaluates the impact of these changes on clinical and functional outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a descriptive study prospectively comparing two cohorts of users: those admitted and discharged from our day hospitals before or during the pandemic. All users received a multidisciplinary assessment at admission and discharge including clinician and user-rated scales on psychopathology, daily living skills, quality of life and caregiver burdens. Improvement in both groups was compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both cohorts were homogenous at admission. Length of admission was not different for the two groups, but users admitted during the pandemic attended the day hospital on significantly fewer days. Improvement observed in most scales was equivalent in both groups, suggesting a similar evolution of both cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite the reduction in assistance days and group therapeutic interventions no major changes were found in the outcomes of both groups. This study shows that careful adaptations and availability, even in critical situations, can result in equally effective treatments. Further research is essential to determine which of these adaptations should be maintained beyond the pandemic.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 5-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530312025000037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530312025000037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

客观:卫生服务显然受到大流行病及其限制的影响。在我们的日间医院单位,用户就诊的天数减少,团体治疗大幅减少,小组用户数量有限,开始进行个人和团体远程治疗。本研究评估了这些变化对临床和功能结果的影响。方法这是一项描述性研究,前瞻性地比较了两组使用者:在大流行之前或期间在我们日间医院住院和出院的患者。所有使用者在入院和出院时都接受了多学科评估,包括临床医生和使用者评定的精神病理学、日常生活技能、生活质量和照护者负担量表。比较两组患者的改善情况。结果两组患者入院时均为同质性。两组的入院时间没有差异,但在大流行期间入院的用户在日间医院就诊的天数明显减少。在大多数量表中观察到的改善在两组中是相同的,这表明两个队列的进化相似。结论尽管减少了辅助治疗天数和团体治疗干预,但两组患者的预后无明显变化。这项研究表明,即使在危急情况下,谨慎的适应和可用性也能产生同样有效的治疗。为了确定在大流行之后应保持哪些适应措施,进一步的研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Day Hospitals in Times of COVID-19

Objective

Mental health services have been clearly affected by the pandemic and its restrictions. In our day hospital units users attended on fewer days, group therapy was drastically reduced, the number of users in groups was limited and individual and group teletherapy was initiated. This study evaluates the impact of these changes on clinical and functional outcomes.

Methods

This is a descriptive study prospectively comparing two cohorts of users: those admitted and discharged from our day hospitals before or during the pandemic. All users received a multidisciplinary assessment at admission and discharge including clinician and user-rated scales on psychopathology, daily living skills, quality of life and caregiver burdens. Improvement in both groups was compared.

Results

Both cohorts were homogenous at admission. Length of admission was not different for the two groups, but users admitted during the pandemic attended the day hospital on significantly fewer days. Improvement observed in most scales was equivalent in both groups, suggesting a similar evolution of both cohorts.

Conclusions

Despite the reduction in assistance days and group therapeutic interventions no major changes were found in the outcomes of both groups. This study shows that careful adaptations and availability, even in critical situations, can result in equally effective treatments. Further research is essential to determine which of these adaptations should be maintained beyond the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信