Haotian Zhang , Zhaohua Wang , Can Wang , Yueting Ding , Zhiyang Shen , Stéphane Blancard
{"title":"关键材料与区域不平等:中国电力行业不同脱碳路径下的材料需求","authors":"Haotian Zhang , Zhaohua Wang , Can Wang , Yueting Ding , Zhiyang Shen , Stéphane Blancard","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China's power sector decarbonization is crucial for global climate goals. However, regional disparities in decarbonization pathways and material demands arise due to differences in resource endowment, economic development, and policy support. This study develops an integrated assessment model to evaluate critical material demand for decarbonizing China's power sector under four scenarios: Business-as-Usual (BAU), Renewable Energy (RE), Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), and Advanced Nuclear (AN). The results show significant provincial variations, with eastern provinces favoring wind and solar, while western and coal-dependent regions rely on hydropower or CCS. Nationally, material demand peaks in the CCS scenario by 2060, especially for structural materials like copper (2250 Mt) and nickel (445 Mt). Functional materials such as silicon and indium see significant demand increases under PV-driven transitions, with silicon reaching 9300 kt and indium 14.2 Mt by 2060 in the RE scenario. These findings highlight the need for region-specific policies, long-term material supply planning, and addressing material demand imbalances for a sustainable energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 108542"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical material and regional inequality: Material demand under diverging decarbonization pathways in China’s power sector\",\"authors\":\"Haotian Zhang , Zhaohua Wang , Can Wang , Yueting Ding , Zhiyang Shen , Stéphane Blancard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>China's power sector decarbonization is crucial for global climate goals. However, regional disparities in decarbonization pathways and material demands arise due to differences in resource endowment, economic development, and policy support. This study develops an integrated assessment model to evaluate critical material demand for decarbonizing China's power sector under four scenarios: Business-as-Usual (BAU), Renewable Energy (RE), Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), and Advanced Nuclear (AN). The results show significant provincial variations, with eastern provinces favoring wind and solar, while western and coal-dependent regions rely on hydropower or CCS. Nationally, material demand peaks in the CCS scenario by 2060, especially for structural materials like copper (2250 Mt) and nickel (445 Mt). Functional materials such as silicon and indium see significant demand increases under PV-driven transitions, with silicon reaching 9300 kt and indium 14.2 Mt by 2060 in the RE scenario. These findings highlight the need for region-specific policies, long-term material supply planning, and addressing material demand imbalances for a sustainable energy transition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"224 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004197\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004197","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Critical material and regional inequality: Material demand under diverging decarbonization pathways in China’s power sector
China's power sector decarbonization is crucial for global climate goals. However, regional disparities in decarbonization pathways and material demands arise due to differences in resource endowment, economic development, and policy support. This study develops an integrated assessment model to evaluate critical material demand for decarbonizing China's power sector under four scenarios: Business-as-Usual (BAU), Renewable Energy (RE), Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), and Advanced Nuclear (AN). The results show significant provincial variations, with eastern provinces favoring wind and solar, while western and coal-dependent regions rely on hydropower or CCS. Nationally, material demand peaks in the CCS scenario by 2060, especially for structural materials like copper (2250 Mt) and nickel (445 Mt). Functional materials such as silicon and indium see significant demand increases under PV-driven transitions, with silicon reaching 9300 kt and indium 14.2 Mt by 2060 in the RE scenario. These findings highlight the need for region-specific policies, long-term material supply planning, and addressing material demand imbalances for a sustainable energy transition.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.