Danil V Makarov,Jerry K Thomas,Shannon Ciprut,Adrian J Rivera,Scott E Sherman,R Scott Braithwaite,Sara L Best,Stephen Blakely,Louis A D'Agostino,Philipp Dahm,Atreya Dash,Michael S Leapman,John T Leppert,Alejandro Sanchez,Jeremy B Shelton,Christopher D Tessier,Craig T Tenner,Heather T Gold,Michele G Shedlin,Steven B Zeliadt
{"title":"前列腺癌影像学管理:多模式、以医生为中心的指导一致影像学干预。","authors":"Danil V Makarov,Jerry K Thomas,Shannon Ciprut,Adrian J Rivera,Scott E Sherman,R Scott Braithwaite,Sara L Best,Stephen Blakely,Louis A D'Agostino,Philipp Dahm,Atreya Dash,Michael S Leapman,John T Leppert,Alejandro Sanchez,Jeremy B Shelton,Christopher D Tessier,Craig T Tenner,Heather T Gold,Michele G Shedlin,Steven B Zeliadt","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nInappropriate imaging to stage low-risk prostate cancer is considered low-value care. Determining the effectiveness of a theory-based intervention, Prostate Cancer Imaging Stewardship (PCIS), to promote guideline-concordant imaging.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial, PCIS, was conducted between March 2018 and March 2021 at ten Veterans Health Administration medical centers (VAMC) initially selected for prostate cancer volume, geographic diversity, and willingness to participate. Intervention initiation at sites were randomized in 3-month intervals. We enrolled 61 urology providers who treat prostate cancer at participating sites. Outcomes were assessed among 2,302 patients with incident prostate cancer aged 18-85 years. PCIS combines three evidence-based provider-focused behavior change strategies: 1) Clinical Reminder Order Check triggered when a provider attempted to order imaging for a patient with PSA < 20ng/mL; 2) VAMC-level academic detailing at initiation and every three months thereafter; 3) Audit and Feedback for providers to improve their imaging performance. The main outcome was guideline-discordant nuclear medicine bone scan (NMBS) imaging for low-risk prostate cancer patients.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nNMBS imaging would be consistent with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines in 878 patients (38%) and inconsistent in 1424 patients (62%). Among patients not requiring NMBS, 141/690 (20.4%) received guideline-discordant imaging (ie, NMBS ordered) during Control compared to 109/734 (14.9%) during Intervention (OR = 0.54, p = .04). Among patients requiring a NMBS, 29/425 (6.8%) did not receive one (ie, guideline-discordant imaging) during Control compared to 25/453 (5.5%) during the Intervention (OR = 1.36, p = .36).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nPCIS significantly reduced low-value, guideline-discordant NMBS imaging among low-risk prostate cancer patients without negatively affecting necessary imaging for high-risk patients.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION\r\nNCT03445559.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"143 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prostate Cancer Imaging Stewardship: a multi-modal, physician-centered intervention for guideline-concordant imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Danil V Makarov,Jerry K Thomas,Shannon Ciprut,Adrian J Rivera,Scott E Sherman,R Scott Braithwaite,Sara L Best,Stephen Blakely,Louis A D'Agostino,Philipp Dahm,Atreya Dash,Michael S Leapman,John T Leppert,Alejandro Sanchez,Jeremy B Shelton,Christopher D Tessier,Craig T Tenner,Heather T Gold,Michele G Shedlin,Steven B Zeliadt\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djaf210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nInappropriate imaging to stage low-risk prostate cancer is considered low-value care. Determining the effectiveness of a theory-based intervention, Prostate Cancer Imaging Stewardship (PCIS), to promote guideline-concordant imaging.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial, PCIS, was conducted between March 2018 and March 2021 at ten Veterans Health Administration medical centers (VAMC) initially selected for prostate cancer volume, geographic diversity, and willingness to participate. Intervention initiation at sites were randomized in 3-month intervals. We enrolled 61 urology providers who treat prostate cancer at participating sites. Outcomes were assessed among 2,302 patients with incident prostate cancer aged 18-85 years. PCIS combines three evidence-based provider-focused behavior change strategies: 1) Clinical Reminder Order Check triggered when a provider attempted to order imaging for a patient with PSA < 20ng/mL; 2) VAMC-level academic detailing at initiation and every three months thereafter; 3) Audit and Feedback for providers to improve their imaging performance. The main outcome was guideline-discordant nuclear medicine bone scan (NMBS) imaging for low-risk prostate cancer patients.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nNMBS imaging would be consistent with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines in 878 patients (38%) and inconsistent in 1424 patients (62%). Among patients not requiring NMBS, 141/690 (20.4%) received guideline-discordant imaging (ie, NMBS ordered) during Control compared to 109/734 (14.9%) during Intervention (OR = 0.54, p = .04). Among patients requiring a NMBS, 29/425 (6.8%) did not receive one (ie, guideline-discordant imaging) during Control compared to 25/453 (5.5%) during the Intervention (OR = 1.36, p = .36).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nPCIS significantly reduced low-value, guideline-discordant NMBS imaging among low-risk prostate cancer patients without negatively affecting necessary imaging for high-risk patients.\\r\\n\\r\\nCLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION\\r\\nNCT03445559.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"143 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:对低风险前列腺癌进行适当的影像学分期被认为是低价值的治疗。确定基于理论的干预的有效性,前列腺癌成像管理(PCIS),以促进指南一致的成像。方法:2018年3月至2021年3月,在10个退伍军人健康管理局医疗中心(VAMC)进行了一项楔形、集群随机试验(PCIS),该试验最初选择了前列腺癌数量、地理多样性和参与意愿。在3个月的时间间隔内随机开始干预。我们招募了61位泌尿科医生,他们在参与的地点治疗前列腺癌。研究人员对2302名年龄在18-85岁的前列腺癌患者的预后进行了评估。PCIS结合了三种基于证据的以提供者为中心的行为改变策略:1)当提供者试图为PSA < 20ng/mL的患者安排影像学检查时触发临床提醒订单检查;2)入职时和此后每三个月进行一次vamc级别的学术详细说明;3)对供应商进行审核和反馈,以提高其成像性能。主要结果是低危前列腺癌患者的核医学骨扫描(NMBS)成像与指南不一致。结果878例(38%)患者的snmbs成像与国家综合癌症网络指南一致,1424例(62%)患者不一致。在不需要NMBS的患者中,141/690(20.4%)在对照组期间接受了与指南不一致的成像(即订购了NMBS),而在干预期间为109/734 (14.9%)(OR = 0.54, p = 0.04)。在需要NMBS的患者中,对照组期间有29/425(6.8%)患者未接受NMBS(即,与指南不一致的成像),而干预期间有25/453(5.5%)患者未接受NMBS (OR = 1.36, p = 0.36)。结论pcis可显著降低低危前列腺癌患者的低价值、与指南不一致的NMBS成像,但对高危患者的必要成像无负面影响。临床试验注册号nct03445559。
Prostate Cancer Imaging Stewardship: a multi-modal, physician-centered intervention for guideline-concordant imaging.
BACKGROUND
Inappropriate imaging to stage low-risk prostate cancer is considered low-value care. Determining the effectiveness of a theory-based intervention, Prostate Cancer Imaging Stewardship (PCIS), to promote guideline-concordant imaging.
METHODS
A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial, PCIS, was conducted between March 2018 and March 2021 at ten Veterans Health Administration medical centers (VAMC) initially selected for prostate cancer volume, geographic diversity, and willingness to participate. Intervention initiation at sites were randomized in 3-month intervals. We enrolled 61 urology providers who treat prostate cancer at participating sites. Outcomes were assessed among 2,302 patients with incident prostate cancer aged 18-85 years. PCIS combines three evidence-based provider-focused behavior change strategies: 1) Clinical Reminder Order Check triggered when a provider attempted to order imaging for a patient with PSA < 20ng/mL; 2) VAMC-level academic detailing at initiation and every three months thereafter; 3) Audit and Feedback for providers to improve their imaging performance. The main outcome was guideline-discordant nuclear medicine bone scan (NMBS) imaging for low-risk prostate cancer patients.
RESULTS
NMBS imaging would be consistent with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines in 878 patients (38%) and inconsistent in 1424 patients (62%). Among patients not requiring NMBS, 141/690 (20.4%) received guideline-discordant imaging (ie, NMBS ordered) during Control compared to 109/734 (14.9%) during Intervention (OR = 0.54, p = .04). Among patients requiring a NMBS, 29/425 (6.8%) did not receive one (ie, guideline-discordant imaging) during Control compared to 25/453 (5.5%) during the Intervention (OR = 1.36, p = .36).
CONCLUSION
PCIS significantly reduced low-value, guideline-discordant NMBS imaging among low-risk prostate cancer patients without negatively affecting necessary imaging for high-risk patients.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
NCT03445559.