全球价值链和生产网络的地缘政治基础:长期视角下的美中技术竞争

IF 2.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Benjamin Selwyn, Christin Bernhold, Dara Leyden
{"title":"全球价值链和生产网络的地缘政治基础:长期视角下的美中技术竞争","authors":"Benjamin Selwyn, Christin Bernhold, Dara Leyden","doi":"10.1093/jeg/lbaf033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Covid-19 pandemic and the heightening of US–China tensions, Global Value Chain (GVC) and Global Production Network (GPN) research has begun to pay more attention to geopolitics. This article argues however, that far from representing a recent phenomenon, geopolitics has underpinned the formation and expansion of GVCs and GPNs. Early GVC and GPN 2.0 literatures did not integrate geopolitical considerations into their conceptual frameworks. To remedy this gap, this article advances the notion of the imperialist chain as a key element in the emergence and expansion of GVCs/GPNs. The notion denotes a structured although contested hierarchy of political-economic formations—entailing hegemonic and counter-hegemonic alliances—where leading states employ geopolitics to maintain their and their firms’ prime positions. China’s catch-up development challenges this structured hierarchy. This article focusses upon the US’s attainment and attempts to maintain its dominant position within the imperialist chain (and of US-firms in GVCs) through control over core technologies. It shows how (a) geopolitical concerns were central to early investments in core technologies by the US and more recently by China, (b) such investments contributed to enabling US firms to attain lead firm status in many GVCs/GPNs, and (c) geopolitical relations underpin contemporary attempts by the US state to repress Chinese technological development.","PeriodicalId":48251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Geography","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The geopolitical underpinning of global value chains and production networks: US–China technological rivalry in a longer-range perspective\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Selwyn, Christin Bernhold, Dara Leyden\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jeg/lbaf033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the Covid-19 pandemic and the heightening of US–China tensions, Global Value Chain (GVC) and Global Production Network (GPN) research has begun to pay more attention to geopolitics. This article argues however, that far from representing a recent phenomenon, geopolitics has underpinned the formation and expansion of GVCs and GPNs. Early GVC and GPN 2.0 literatures did not integrate geopolitical considerations into their conceptual frameworks. To remedy this gap, this article advances the notion of the imperialist chain as a key element in the emergence and expansion of GVCs/GPNs. The notion denotes a structured although contested hierarchy of political-economic formations—entailing hegemonic and counter-hegemonic alliances—where leading states employ geopolitics to maintain their and their firms’ prime positions. China’s catch-up development challenges this structured hierarchy. This article focusses upon the US’s attainment and attempts to maintain its dominant position within the imperialist chain (and of US-firms in GVCs) through control over core technologies. It shows how (a) geopolitical concerns were central to early investments in core technologies by the US and more recently by China, (b) such investments contributed to enabling US firms to attain lead firm status in many GVCs/GPNs, and (c) geopolitical relations underpin contemporary attempts by the US state to repress Chinese technological development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Geography\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbaf033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Geography","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbaf033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自新冠肺炎疫情和中美紧张局势加剧以来,全球价值链和全球生产网络研究开始更多地关注地缘政治。然而,本文认为,地缘政治远不是最近才出现的现象,地缘政治已经成为全球价值链和全球网络形成和扩张的基础。早期的GVC和GPN 2.0文献并未将地缘政治因素纳入其概念框架。为了弥补这一差距,本文提出了帝国主义链条的概念,认为它是全球价值链/全球生产网络出现和扩张的关键因素。这一概念指的是一种结构化的、尽管存在争议的政治经济结构等级——包括霸权和反霸权联盟——主要国家利用地缘政治来维持它们和它们公司的主要地位。中国的赶超式发展挑战了这种结构性的等级制度。本文关注的是美国通过控制核心技术,在帝国主义链条(以及全球价值链中的美国公司)中取得并试图保持其主导地位。它显示了(a)地缘政治问题对美国和最近中国对核心技术的早期投资至关重要,(b)这些投资有助于使美国公司在许多全球价值链/全球网络中获得领先的公司地位,以及(c)地缘政治关系支撑了美国政府当代压制中国技术发展的企图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The geopolitical underpinning of global value chains and production networks: US–China technological rivalry in a longer-range perspective
Since the Covid-19 pandemic and the heightening of US–China tensions, Global Value Chain (GVC) and Global Production Network (GPN) research has begun to pay more attention to geopolitics. This article argues however, that far from representing a recent phenomenon, geopolitics has underpinned the formation and expansion of GVCs and GPNs. Early GVC and GPN 2.0 literatures did not integrate geopolitical considerations into their conceptual frameworks. To remedy this gap, this article advances the notion of the imperialist chain as a key element in the emergence and expansion of GVCs/GPNs. The notion denotes a structured although contested hierarchy of political-economic formations—entailing hegemonic and counter-hegemonic alliances—where leading states employ geopolitics to maintain their and their firms’ prime positions. China’s catch-up development challenges this structured hierarchy. This article focusses upon the US’s attainment and attempts to maintain its dominant position within the imperialist chain (and of US-firms in GVCs) through control over core technologies. It shows how (a) geopolitical concerns were central to early investments in core technologies by the US and more recently by China, (b) such investments contributed to enabling US firms to attain lead firm status in many GVCs/GPNs, and (c) geopolitical relations underpin contemporary attempts by the US state to repress Chinese technological development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The aims of the Journal of Economic Geography are to redefine and reinvigorate the intersection between economics and geography, and to provide a world-class journal in the field. The journal is steered by a distinguished team of Editors and an Editorial Board, drawn equally from the two disciplines. It publishes original academic research and discussion of the highest scholarly standard in the field of ''economic geography'' broadly defined. Submitted papers are refereed, and are evaluated on the basis of their creativity, quality of scholarship, and contribution to advancing understanding of the geographic nature of economic systems and global economic change.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信