{"title":"全球价值链和生产网络的地缘政治基础:长期视角下的美中技术竞争","authors":"Benjamin Selwyn, Christin Bernhold, Dara Leyden","doi":"10.1093/jeg/lbaf033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Covid-19 pandemic and the heightening of US–China tensions, Global Value Chain (GVC) and Global Production Network (GPN) research has begun to pay more attention to geopolitics. This article argues however, that far from representing a recent phenomenon, geopolitics has underpinned the formation and expansion of GVCs and GPNs. Early GVC and GPN 2.0 literatures did not integrate geopolitical considerations into their conceptual frameworks. To remedy this gap, this article advances the notion of the imperialist chain as a key element in the emergence and expansion of GVCs/GPNs. The notion denotes a structured although contested hierarchy of political-economic formations—entailing hegemonic and counter-hegemonic alliances—where leading states employ geopolitics to maintain their and their firms’ prime positions. China’s catch-up development challenges this structured hierarchy. This article focusses upon the US’s attainment and attempts to maintain its dominant position within the imperialist chain (and of US-firms in GVCs) through control over core technologies. It shows how (a) geopolitical concerns were central to early investments in core technologies by the US and more recently by China, (b) such investments contributed to enabling US firms to attain lead firm status in many GVCs/GPNs, and (c) geopolitical relations underpin contemporary attempts by the US state to repress Chinese technological development.","PeriodicalId":48251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Geography","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The geopolitical underpinning of global value chains and production networks: US–China technological rivalry in a longer-range perspective\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Selwyn, Christin Bernhold, Dara Leyden\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jeg/lbaf033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the Covid-19 pandemic and the heightening of US–China tensions, Global Value Chain (GVC) and Global Production Network (GPN) research has begun to pay more attention to geopolitics. This article argues however, that far from representing a recent phenomenon, geopolitics has underpinned the formation and expansion of GVCs and GPNs. Early GVC and GPN 2.0 literatures did not integrate geopolitical considerations into their conceptual frameworks. To remedy this gap, this article advances the notion of the imperialist chain as a key element in the emergence and expansion of GVCs/GPNs. The notion denotes a structured although contested hierarchy of political-economic formations—entailing hegemonic and counter-hegemonic alliances—where leading states employ geopolitics to maintain their and their firms’ prime positions. China’s catch-up development challenges this structured hierarchy. This article focusses upon the US’s attainment and attempts to maintain its dominant position within the imperialist chain (and of US-firms in GVCs) through control over core technologies. It shows how (a) geopolitical concerns were central to early investments in core technologies by the US and more recently by China, (b) such investments contributed to enabling US firms to attain lead firm status in many GVCs/GPNs, and (c) geopolitical relations underpin contemporary attempts by the US state to repress Chinese technological development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Geography\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbaf033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Geography","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbaf033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The geopolitical underpinning of global value chains and production networks: US–China technological rivalry in a longer-range perspective
Since the Covid-19 pandemic and the heightening of US–China tensions, Global Value Chain (GVC) and Global Production Network (GPN) research has begun to pay more attention to geopolitics. This article argues however, that far from representing a recent phenomenon, geopolitics has underpinned the formation and expansion of GVCs and GPNs. Early GVC and GPN 2.0 literatures did not integrate geopolitical considerations into their conceptual frameworks. To remedy this gap, this article advances the notion of the imperialist chain as a key element in the emergence and expansion of GVCs/GPNs. The notion denotes a structured although contested hierarchy of political-economic formations—entailing hegemonic and counter-hegemonic alliances—where leading states employ geopolitics to maintain their and their firms’ prime positions. China’s catch-up development challenges this structured hierarchy. This article focusses upon the US’s attainment and attempts to maintain its dominant position within the imperialist chain (and of US-firms in GVCs) through control over core technologies. It shows how (a) geopolitical concerns were central to early investments in core technologies by the US and more recently by China, (b) such investments contributed to enabling US firms to attain lead firm status in many GVCs/GPNs, and (c) geopolitical relations underpin contemporary attempts by the US state to repress Chinese technological development.
期刊介绍:
The aims of the Journal of Economic Geography are to redefine and reinvigorate the intersection between economics and geography, and to provide a world-class journal in the field. The journal is steered by a distinguished team of Editors and an Editorial Board, drawn equally from the two disciplines. It publishes original academic research and discussion of the highest scholarly standard in the field of ''economic geography'' broadly defined. Submitted papers are refereed, and are evaluated on the basis of their creativity, quality of scholarship, and contribution to advancing understanding of the geographic nature of economic systems and global economic change.