从唾液激素、心理状态和学习成绩预测军事白刃战课程的表现。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Meaghan E Beckner, Jesse A Stein, Drew Van Dam, Nicholas Barringer, Tracey J Smith, Matthew C Larsen, Joseph J Knapik, Harris R Lieberman
{"title":"从唾液激素、心理状态和学习成绩预测军事白刃战课程的表现。","authors":"Meaghan E Beckner, Jesse A Stein, Drew Van Dam, Nicholas Barringer, Tracey J Smith, Matthew C Larsen, Joseph J Knapik, Harris R Lieberman","doi":"10.1002/smi.70096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are limited opportunities to study physiological and psychological factors that predict success in real world high stress environments where individuals must engage in controlled aggressive behaviour. All cadets attending the United States Military Academy must take a combatives course where they are taught to compete in hand-to-hand combat with peers and graded on performance. This study assessed, in this highly competitive environment, the physiological, psychological, and academic predictors of success in the course's final exam, a final hand-to-hand combat match. Male (n = 109) and female (n = 23) cadets completed self-report assessments of resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale; CD-RISC), mental toughness (Mental Toughness Questionnaire; MTQ-10), and aggression (Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire; BPAQ) upon enrolment in Combatives. Immediately preceding the final match, cadets provided saliva samples and completed mood state (Profile of Mood States; POMS), self-confidence and competitive state anxiety (Competitive State Anxiety Inventory; CSAI-2) questionnaires. Cortisol, testosterone, and secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) in saliva were assessed. Instructors provided match outcome, win versus loss, and each cadet's grade point averages (GPA; academic, military, and physical). Logistic regression analyses determined if physiological, psychological, or academic variables predicted match outcome. Sex, time of day, prior combatives experience, and midterm combatives performance were included as covariates. Greater self-confidence (OR [95% CI]; 1.13 [1.03, 1.25]) and a better physical GPA (4.51 [1.52, 13.42]) were associated with increased odds of winning the final match, with an overall classification accuracy of 68.9% and explained 31% of the variance in match outcome. Greater cognitive anxiety independently decreased the odds of winning (0.93 [0.87, 0.99]), but not when combined with self-confidence and physical GPA. No other factors significantly impacted odds of winning. Self-confidence and physical performance are key contributors to success in hand-to-hand combat and may mediate the influence of anxiety on performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51175,"journal":{"name":"Stress and Health","volume":"41 4","pages":"e70096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Performance in a Military Hand-to-Hand Combat Course From Salivary Hormones, Psychological State, and Academic Performance.\",\"authors\":\"Meaghan E Beckner, Jesse A Stein, Drew Van Dam, Nicholas Barringer, Tracey J Smith, Matthew C Larsen, Joseph J Knapik, Harris R Lieberman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/smi.70096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are limited opportunities to study physiological and psychological factors that predict success in real world high stress environments where individuals must engage in controlled aggressive behaviour. All cadets attending the United States Military Academy must take a combatives course where they are taught to compete in hand-to-hand combat with peers and graded on performance. This study assessed, in this highly competitive environment, the physiological, psychological, and academic predictors of success in the course's final exam, a final hand-to-hand combat match. Male (n = 109) and female (n = 23) cadets completed self-report assessments of resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale; CD-RISC), mental toughness (Mental Toughness Questionnaire; MTQ-10), and aggression (Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire; BPAQ) upon enrolment in Combatives. Immediately preceding the final match, cadets provided saliva samples and completed mood state (Profile of Mood States; POMS), self-confidence and competitive state anxiety (Competitive State Anxiety Inventory; CSAI-2) questionnaires. Cortisol, testosterone, and secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) in saliva were assessed. Instructors provided match outcome, win versus loss, and each cadet's grade point averages (GPA; academic, military, and physical). Logistic regression analyses determined if physiological, psychological, or academic variables predicted match outcome. Sex, time of day, prior combatives experience, and midterm combatives performance were included as covariates. Greater self-confidence (OR [95% CI]; 1.13 [1.03, 1.25]) and a better physical GPA (4.51 [1.52, 13.42]) were associated with increased odds of winning the final match, with an overall classification accuracy of 68.9% and explained 31% of the variance in match outcome. Greater cognitive anxiety independently decreased the odds of winning (0.93 [0.87, 0.99]), but not when combined with self-confidence and physical GPA. No other factors significantly impacted odds of winning. Self-confidence and physical performance are key contributors to success in hand-to-hand combat and may mediate the influence of anxiety on performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stress and Health\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"e70096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stress and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70096\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现实世界的高压力环境中,个体必须参与控制攻击行为,研究预测成功的生理和心理因素的机会有限。所有参加美国军事学院的学员都必须参加格斗课程,在那里他们被教导与同龄人进行肉搏战,并根据表现进行评分。在这个竞争激烈的环境中,这项研究评估了在课程期末考试中成功的生理、心理和学术预测因素,这是一场最终的肉搏战。男学员(n = 109)和女学员(n = 23)分别完成了心理弹性自我报告评估(Connor-Davidson心理弹性量表;CD-RISC)、心理韧性(心理韧性问卷;MTQ-10)和攻击(Buss-Perry攻击问卷;BPAQ)报名参加格斗。在最后一场比赛之前,学员们提供了唾液样本并完成了情绪状态(情绪状态简介;(POMS)、自信与竞争状态焦虑(竞争状态焦虑量表;CSAI-2)问卷调查。评估唾液中的皮质醇、睾酮和分泌性免疫球蛋白A (SIgA)。教练提供了比赛结果、输赢,以及每个学员的平均绩点(GPA;学术、军事和体育)。逻辑回归分析确定是否生理、心理或学术变量预测匹配结果。性别、一天中的时间、以前的格斗经验和中期格斗表现被纳入协变量。更自信(OR [95% CI];1.13[1.03, 1.25])和更好的身体GPA(4.51[1.52, 13.42])与赢得决赛的几率增加有关,总体分类准确率为68.9%,解释了31%的比赛结果差异。更大的认知焦虑单独降低了获胜的几率(0.93[0.87,0.99]),但当自信和物理GPA结合在一起时则没有。没有其他因素显著影响中奖几率。自信和体能表现是肉搏战中成功的关键因素,并可能调节焦虑对表现的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Performance in a Military Hand-to-Hand Combat Course From Salivary Hormones, Psychological State, and Academic Performance.

There are limited opportunities to study physiological and psychological factors that predict success in real world high stress environments where individuals must engage in controlled aggressive behaviour. All cadets attending the United States Military Academy must take a combatives course where they are taught to compete in hand-to-hand combat with peers and graded on performance. This study assessed, in this highly competitive environment, the physiological, psychological, and academic predictors of success in the course's final exam, a final hand-to-hand combat match. Male (n = 109) and female (n = 23) cadets completed self-report assessments of resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale; CD-RISC), mental toughness (Mental Toughness Questionnaire; MTQ-10), and aggression (Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire; BPAQ) upon enrolment in Combatives. Immediately preceding the final match, cadets provided saliva samples and completed mood state (Profile of Mood States; POMS), self-confidence and competitive state anxiety (Competitive State Anxiety Inventory; CSAI-2) questionnaires. Cortisol, testosterone, and secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) in saliva were assessed. Instructors provided match outcome, win versus loss, and each cadet's grade point averages (GPA; academic, military, and physical). Logistic regression analyses determined if physiological, psychological, or academic variables predicted match outcome. Sex, time of day, prior combatives experience, and midterm combatives performance were included as covariates. Greater self-confidence (OR [95% CI]; 1.13 [1.03, 1.25]) and a better physical GPA (4.51 [1.52, 13.42]) were associated with increased odds of winning the final match, with an overall classification accuracy of 68.9% and explained 31% of the variance in match outcome. Greater cognitive anxiety independently decreased the odds of winning (0.93 [0.87, 0.99]), but not when combined with self-confidence and physical GPA. No other factors significantly impacted odds of winning. Self-confidence and physical performance are key contributors to success in hand-to-hand combat and may mediate the influence of anxiety on performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stress and Health
Stress and Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Stress is a normal component of life and a number of mechanisms exist to cope with its effects. The stresses that challenge man"s existence in our modern society may result in failure of these coping mechanisms, with resultant stress-induced illness. The aim of the journal therefore is to provide a forum for discussion of all aspects of stress which affect the individual in both health and disease. The Journal explores the subject from as many aspects as possible, so that when stress becomes a consideration, health information can be presented as to the best ways by which to minimise its effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信