在经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中,通过远程医疗检查阻力训练和蛋白质补充的效果。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Christopher M Schattinger, Mia K Newlin-Bradner, Shiloah A Kviatkovsky, Ginny L Smith, Shelby E Olsson, Catie A Thompson, Thomas E Noel, Michael J Ormsbee, Lynn B Panton
{"title":"在经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中,通过远程医疗检查阻力训练和蛋白质补充的效果。","authors":"Christopher M Schattinger, Mia K Newlin-Bradner, Shiloah A Kviatkovsky, Ginny L Smith, Shelby E Olsson, Catie A Thompson, Thomas E Noel, Michael J Ormsbee, Lynn B Panton","doi":"10.1123/japa.2024-0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Approximately 70% of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients prior to TAVR have low muscle mass, increased mortality risk, and reduced quality of life (QoL) with little improvement in muscle mass and QoL after TAVR. Resistance training (RT) with protein supplementation is effective for maintaining and increasing muscle mass but has not been studied in TAVR patients. This study evaluated the effects of a 12-week telehealth program of RT combined with protein supplementation (RT + PRO; n = 11) versus PRO alone (n = 11) on body composition, inflammation, strength, physical function, and QoL in TAVR patients (75.7 ± 6.5 years; body mass index: 31.3 ± 6.4 kg/m2).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RT + PRO completed a RT program of 12 exercises, 2×/week, 8-15 repetitions, for 1-3 sets and consumed 75 g (37.5 g 2×/day) of whey protein. PRO consumed the same protein but did not exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no reported injuries. Adherence to the exercise and protein supplementation was greater than 90%. RT + PRO had greater improvements in strength (30-s chair stands: RT + PRO pre: 11 ± 3 vs. post: 13 ± 3; PRO pre: 12 ± 2 vs. post: 12 ± 3 repetitions; p = .003; time to complete five sit-to-stands: RT + PRO pre: 12.3 ± 3.8 vs. post: 9.6 ± 2.7; PRO pre: 11.2 ± 2.4 vs. post: 10.9 ± 2.9 s; p = .011) and QoL (Sarcopenia QoL Questionnaire: RT + PRO pre: 63.7 ± 12.9 vs. post: 74.0 ± 14.6; PRO pre: 69.7 ± 13.6 vs. post: 69.2 ± 16.1 points; p = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>The telehealth exercise program was safe and well attended. The RT + PRO protocol significantly improved some measures of muscular strength and QoL in TAVR patients. A telehealth exercise program may serve as an alternative to traditional in person cardiac rehabilitation programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Study in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients to Examine the Effects of Resistance Training and Protein Supplementation Through Telehealth.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher M Schattinger, Mia K Newlin-Bradner, Shiloah A Kviatkovsky, Ginny L Smith, Shelby E Olsson, Catie A Thompson, Thomas E Noel, Michael J Ormsbee, Lynn B Panton\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/japa.2024-0154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Approximately 70% of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients prior to TAVR have low muscle mass, increased mortality risk, and reduced quality of life (QoL) with little improvement in muscle mass and QoL after TAVR. Resistance training (RT) with protein supplementation is effective for maintaining and increasing muscle mass but has not been studied in TAVR patients. This study evaluated the effects of a 12-week telehealth program of RT combined with protein supplementation (RT + PRO; n = 11) versus PRO alone (n = 11) on body composition, inflammation, strength, physical function, and QoL in TAVR patients (75.7 ± 6.5 years; body mass index: 31.3 ± 6.4 kg/m2).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RT + PRO completed a RT program of 12 exercises, 2×/week, 8-15 repetitions, for 1-3 sets and consumed 75 g (37.5 g 2×/day) of whey protein. PRO consumed the same protein but did not exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no reported injuries. Adherence to the exercise and protein supplementation was greater than 90%. RT + PRO had greater improvements in strength (30-s chair stands: RT + PRO pre: 11 ± 3 vs. post: 13 ± 3; PRO pre: 12 ± 2 vs. post: 12 ± 3 repetitions; p = .003; time to complete five sit-to-stands: RT + PRO pre: 12.3 ± 3.8 vs. post: 9.6 ± 2.7; PRO pre: 11.2 ± 2.4 vs. post: 10.9 ± 2.9 s; p = .011) and QoL (Sarcopenia QoL Questionnaire: RT + PRO pre: 63.7 ± 12.9 vs. post: 74.0 ± 14.6; PRO pre: 69.7 ± 13.6 vs. post: 69.2 ± 16.1 points; p = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>The telehealth exercise program was safe and well attended. The RT + PRO protocol significantly improved some measures of muscular strength and QoL in TAVR patients. A telehealth exercise program may serve as an alternative to traditional in person cardiac rehabilitation programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2024-0154\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2024-0154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:大约70%的经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者在TAVR之前肌肉质量低,死亡风险增加,生活质量(QoL)下降,TAVR后肌肉质量和生活质量几乎没有改善。补充蛋白质的阻力训练(RT)对维持和增加肌肉质量有效,但尚未在TAVR患者中进行研究。本研究评估了为期12周的RT联合蛋白质补充远程医疗计划(RT + PRO;n = 11)与单独使用PRO (n = 11)在TAVR患者(75.7±6.5年;体重指数:31.3±6.4 kg/m2)。方法:RT + PRO完成12组运动,2次/周,8-15次重复,1-3组,消耗75 g (37.5 g 2x /天)乳清蛋白。PRO组摄入同样的蛋白质,但不运动。结果:无损伤报告。坚持运动和补充蛋白质的比例超过90%。RT + PRO在强度方面有更大的改善(30-s椅架:RT + PRO pre: 11±3 vs. post: 13±3;PRO前:12±2 vs后:12±3次重复;P = .003;完成五次坐立的时间:RT + PRO前:12.3±3.8 vs后:9.6±2.7;PRO pre: 11.2±2.4 vs. post: 10.9±2.9 s;p = 0.011)和生活质量(肌少症生活质量问卷调查:RT + PRO术前:63.7±12.9 vs术后:74.0±14.6;PRO pre: 69.7±13.6 vs. post: 69.2±16.1分;P = .002)。结论/启示:远程医疗锻炼计划是安全的,参加人数多。RT + PRO方案显著改善了TAVR患者肌肉力量和生活质量的一些指标。远程保健锻炼计划可以作为传统的个人心脏康复计划的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Pilot Study in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients to Examine the Effects of Resistance Training and Protein Supplementation Through Telehealth.

Background/objectives: Approximately 70% of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients prior to TAVR have low muscle mass, increased mortality risk, and reduced quality of life (QoL) with little improvement in muscle mass and QoL after TAVR. Resistance training (RT) with protein supplementation is effective for maintaining and increasing muscle mass but has not been studied in TAVR patients. This study evaluated the effects of a 12-week telehealth program of RT combined with protein supplementation (RT + PRO; n = 11) versus PRO alone (n = 11) on body composition, inflammation, strength, physical function, and QoL in TAVR patients (75.7 ± 6.5 years; body mass index: 31.3 ± 6.4 kg/m2).

Methods: RT + PRO completed a RT program of 12 exercises, 2×/week, 8-15 repetitions, for 1-3 sets and consumed 75 g (37.5 g 2×/day) of whey protein. PRO consumed the same protein but did not exercise.

Results: There were no reported injuries. Adherence to the exercise and protein supplementation was greater than 90%. RT + PRO had greater improvements in strength (30-s chair stands: RT + PRO pre: 11 ± 3 vs. post: 13 ± 3; PRO pre: 12 ± 2 vs. post: 12 ± 3 repetitions; p = .003; time to complete five sit-to-stands: RT + PRO pre: 12.3 ± 3.8 vs. post: 9.6 ± 2.7; PRO pre: 11.2 ± 2.4 vs. post: 10.9 ± 2.9 s; p = .011) and QoL (Sarcopenia QoL Questionnaire: RT + PRO pre: 63.7 ± 12.9 vs. post: 74.0 ± 14.6; PRO pre: 69.7 ± 13.6 vs. post: 69.2 ± 16.1 points; p = .002).

Conclusions/implications: The telehealth exercise program was safe and well attended. The RT + PRO protocol significantly improved some measures of muscular strength and QoL in TAVR patients. A telehealth exercise program may serve as an alternative to traditional in person cardiac rehabilitation programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Physical Activity (JAPA) is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed original research reports, scholarly reviews, and professional-application articles on the relationship between physical activity and the aging process. The journal encourages the submission of articles that can contribute to an understanding of (a) the impact of physical activity on physiological, psychological, and social aspects of older adults and (b) the effect of advancing age or the aging process on physical activity among older adults. In addition to publishing research reports and reviews, JAPA publishes articles that examine the development, implementation, and evaluation of physical activity programs among older adults. Articles from the biological, behavioral, and social sciences, as well as from fields such as medicine, clinical psychology, physical and recreational therapy, health, physical education, and recreation, are appropriate for the journal. Studies using animal models do not fit within our mission statement and should be submitted elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信