1型糖尿病和糖尿病周围神经病变患者直腿抬高和下垂神经动力学试验中的机械敏感性

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Georgia Koutsoflini, Antonios Lepouras, Colette Ridehalgh
{"title":"1型糖尿病和糖尿病周围神经病变患者直腿抬高和下垂神经动力学试验中的机械敏感性","authors":"Georgia Koutsoflini, Antonios Lepouras, Colette Ridehalgh","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2025.2544285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Neurodynamic tests are clinical tests used to identify heightened nerve mechanosensitivity but may be negative in the presence of severe neuropathy, as seen in people with carpal tunnel syndrome and type 2 diabetes. It is not known if this also occurs in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) from type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The primary aim of this study is to determine the proportion of positive neurodynamic tests in people with T1DM and DPN. The secondary aim is to assess whether the severity of DPN influences the presence of a positive neurodynamic test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study. Forty-three participants with T1DM and DPN were assessed using straight leg raise (SLR) and slump neurodynamic tests to determine a positive and negative test. DPN severity was graded according to Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six percent and 56% of participants had positive SLR and slump tests, respectively, indicating heightened nerve mechanosensitivity. There was a statistically significant association between negative neurodynamic tests and DPN severity (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). In addition, participants with negative neurodynamic tests had significantly higher TCSS scores compared to participants with positive neurodynamic tests (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>People with T1DM and severe DPN, as graded by TCSS, are more likely to demonstrate negative neurodynamic tests than those with mild DPN. Future studies should investigate the relationship between neurodynamic tests and nerve function in other conditions. This supports previous research on negative neurodynamic tests in severe neuropathy, suggesting that neurodynamic tests should not be used alone to determine nerve involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanosensitivity during straight leg raise and slump neurodynamic tests in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus and diabetic peripheral neuropathy.\",\"authors\":\"Georgia Koutsoflini, Antonios Lepouras, Colette Ridehalgh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10669817.2025.2544285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Neurodynamic tests are clinical tests used to identify heightened nerve mechanosensitivity but may be negative in the presence of severe neuropathy, as seen in people with carpal tunnel syndrome and type 2 diabetes. It is not known if this also occurs in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) from type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The primary aim of this study is to determine the proportion of positive neurodynamic tests in people with T1DM and DPN. The secondary aim is to assess whether the severity of DPN influences the presence of a positive neurodynamic test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study. Forty-three participants with T1DM and DPN were assessed using straight leg raise (SLR) and slump neurodynamic tests to determine a positive and negative test. DPN severity was graded according to Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six percent and 56% of participants had positive SLR and slump tests, respectively, indicating heightened nerve mechanosensitivity. There was a statistically significant association between negative neurodynamic tests and DPN severity (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). In addition, participants with negative neurodynamic tests had significantly higher TCSS scores compared to participants with positive neurodynamic tests (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>People with T1DM and severe DPN, as graded by TCSS, are more likely to demonstrate negative neurodynamic tests than those with mild DPN. Future studies should investigate the relationship between neurodynamic tests and nerve function in other conditions. This supports previous research on negative neurodynamic tests in severe neuropathy, suggesting that neurodynamic tests should not be used alone to determine nerve involvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2544285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2544285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:神经动力学试验是用于识别神经机械敏感性增高的临床试验,但在存在严重神经病变的情况下,如腕管综合征和2型糖尿病患者,可能呈阴性。目前尚不清楚这种情况是否也发生在1型糖尿病(T1DM)的糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)患者中。本研究的主要目的是确定T1DM和DPN患者神经动力学测试阳性的比例。第二个目的是评估DPN的严重程度是否影响神经动力学测试阳性的存在。方法:这是一个横断面研究。对43名T1DM和DPN患者进行直腿抬高(SLR)和暴跌神经动力学测试,以确定阳性和阴性测试。根据多伦多临床评分系统(TCSS)对DPN严重程度进行评分。结果:46%和56%的参与者SLR和坍落度测试分别呈阳性,表明神经机械敏感性增高。神经动力学试验阴性与DPN严重程度之间存在统计学显著相关性(p p)讨论/结论:T1DM和重度DPN患者,根据TCSS分级,比轻度DPN患者更容易出现神经动力学试验阴性。未来的研究应探讨在其他情况下神经动力学测试与神经功能之间的关系。这支持了先前关于严重神经病变阴性神经动力学试验的研究,表明神经动力学试验不应单独用于确定神经受累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanosensitivity during straight leg raise and slump neurodynamic tests in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus and diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Objectives: Neurodynamic tests are clinical tests used to identify heightened nerve mechanosensitivity but may be negative in the presence of severe neuropathy, as seen in people with carpal tunnel syndrome and type 2 diabetes. It is not known if this also occurs in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) from type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The primary aim of this study is to determine the proportion of positive neurodynamic tests in people with T1DM and DPN. The secondary aim is to assess whether the severity of DPN influences the presence of a positive neurodynamic test.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Forty-three participants with T1DM and DPN were assessed using straight leg raise (SLR) and slump neurodynamic tests to determine a positive and negative test. DPN severity was graded according to Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS).

Results: Forty-six percent and 56% of participants had positive SLR and slump tests, respectively, indicating heightened nerve mechanosensitivity. There was a statistically significant association between negative neurodynamic tests and DPN severity (p < 0.0001). In addition, participants with negative neurodynamic tests had significantly higher TCSS scores compared to participants with positive neurodynamic tests (p < 0.0001).

Discussion/conclusion: People with T1DM and severe DPN, as graded by TCSS, are more likely to demonstrate negative neurodynamic tests than those with mild DPN. Future studies should investigate the relationship between neurodynamic tests and nerve function in other conditions. This supports previous research on negative neurodynamic tests in severe neuropathy, suggesting that neurodynamic tests should not be used alone to determine nerve involvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信