肩袖撕裂和肩僵硬的筛选和风险预测模型的建立和验证。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Annals of Joint Pub Date : 2025-07-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/aoj-25-16
Xiangyang Sun, Jiyuan Qi, Linyuan Zhang, Atiya Prajna Hooblal, Timoné Wagner, Zhi Yong Wong, Fusheng Wang, Weiguo Zhang, Kang Tian
{"title":"肩袖撕裂和肩僵硬的筛选和风险预测模型的建立和验证。","authors":"Xiangyang Sun, Jiyuan Qi, Linyuan Zhang, Atiya Prajna Hooblal, Timoné Wagner, Zhi Yong Wong, Fusheng Wang, Weiguo Zhang, Kang Tian","doi":"10.21037/aoj-25-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) with shoulder stiffness have a high association rate; however, the mechanism and possible risk factors are unclear. This study aims to collect the factors that may affect RCT and shoulder stiffness, screen out the relevant risk factors through statistical analysis, and establish a simple model to predict the risk of RCT combined with shoulder stiffness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 406 patients diagnosed with RCT through arthroscopic surgery at the Department of Joint and Sports Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, from December 2019 to June 2023. The analysis comprised two groups: 213 patients with both RCT and shoulder stiffness, and 193 patients without shoulder stiffness. A total of 21 potential risk factors associated with RCT and shoulder stiffness were considered, and a prediction model was developed using single-focus logistic regression analysis and multifocal logistic regression analysis in the training set (N=284), which was presented as nomograms. The validation set (N=122) was used to assess the model's discrimination, calibration and clinical practicability. The proportion of patients with RCT combined with shoulder stiffness in both the training set and the validation set was 52.5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified eight pertinent risk factors: gender, dominant side, smoking, hypothyroidism, depression, hyperlipidemia, type III acromion, and partial tear. Based on these factors, a clinical prediction model was developed. The model demonstrated excellent predictive performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.856 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.812-0.900] for the training set and 0.867 (95% CI: 0.807-0.928) for the validation set. Calibration curves exhibited strong agreement between the actual disease probabilities and predicted probabilities using the model in both datasets. Decision curve analysis (DCA) further confirmed the clinical utility of the model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on routine data, the prediction model offers clinicians a simple and reliable tool for predicting the combination of RCT and shoulder stiffness.</p>","PeriodicalId":44459,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Joint","volume":"10 ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment and validation of a screening and risk predication model for rotator cuff tear and shoulder stiffness.\",\"authors\":\"Xiangyang Sun, Jiyuan Qi, Linyuan Zhang, Atiya Prajna Hooblal, Timoné Wagner, Zhi Yong Wong, Fusheng Wang, Weiguo Zhang, Kang Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/aoj-25-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) with shoulder stiffness have a high association rate; however, the mechanism and possible risk factors are unclear. This study aims to collect the factors that may affect RCT and shoulder stiffness, screen out the relevant risk factors through statistical analysis, and establish a simple model to predict the risk of RCT combined with shoulder stiffness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 406 patients diagnosed with RCT through arthroscopic surgery at the Department of Joint and Sports Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, from December 2019 to June 2023. The analysis comprised two groups: 213 patients with both RCT and shoulder stiffness, and 193 patients without shoulder stiffness. A total of 21 potential risk factors associated with RCT and shoulder stiffness were considered, and a prediction model was developed using single-focus logistic regression analysis and multifocal logistic regression analysis in the training set (N=284), which was presented as nomograms. The validation set (N=122) was used to assess the model's discrimination, calibration and clinical practicability. The proportion of patients with RCT combined with shoulder stiffness in both the training set and the validation set was 52.5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified eight pertinent risk factors: gender, dominant side, smoking, hypothyroidism, depression, hyperlipidemia, type III acromion, and partial tear. Based on these factors, a clinical prediction model was developed. The model demonstrated excellent predictive performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.856 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.812-0.900] for the training set and 0.867 (95% CI: 0.807-0.928) for the validation set. Calibration curves exhibited strong agreement between the actual disease probabilities and predicted probabilities using the model in both datasets. Decision curve analysis (DCA) further confirmed the clinical utility of the model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on routine data, the prediction model offers clinicians a simple and reliable tool for predicting the combination of RCT and shoulder stiffness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Joint\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336886/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Joint\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-25-16\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Joint","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-25-16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肩袖撕裂(rct)与肩僵硬有很高的关联率;然而,其机制和可能的危险因素尚不清楚。本研究旨在收集可能影响RCT与肩关节僵硬的因素,通过统计分析筛选出相关危险因素,建立预测RCT联合肩关节僵硬风险的简单模型。方法:回顾性分析2019年12月至2023年6月大连医科大学第一附属医院关节与运动医学科通过关节镜手术诊断为RCT的406例患者。该分析包括两组:213例有RCT和肩关节僵硬的患者,以及193例无肩关节僵硬的患者。共考虑与RCT和肩僵硬相关的21个潜在危险因素,并在训练集(N=284)中采用单焦点逻辑回归分析和多焦点逻辑回归分析建立预测模型,以模态图表示。验证集(N=122)用于评估模型的鉴别性、校正性和临床实用性。RCT合并肩关节僵硬的患者在训练集和验证集中所占比例均为52.5%。结果:研究确定了8个相关的危险因素:性别、优势侧、吸烟、甲状腺功能减退、抑郁、高脂血症、III型肩峰和部分撕裂。基于这些因素,建立了临床预测模型。该模型表现出优异的预测性能,训练集的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.856[95%置信区间(CI): 0.812-0.900],验证集为0.867 (95% CI: 0.807-0.928)。在两个数据集中,使用该模型的校准曲线在实际疾病概率和预测概率之间显示出很强的一致性。决策曲线分析(DCA)进一步证实了该模型的临床实用性。结论:基于常规数据,该预测模型为临床医生提供了一种简单可靠的工具来预测RCT和肩僵硬的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishment and validation of a screening and risk predication model for rotator cuff tear and shoulder stiffness.

Background: Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) with shoulder stiffness have a high association rate; however, the mechanism and possible risk factors are unclear. This study aims to collect the factors that may affect RCT and shoulder stiffness, screen out the relevant risk factors through statistical analysis, and establish a simple model to predict the risk of RCT combined with shoulder stiffness.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 406 patients diagnosed with RCT through arthroscopic surgery at the Department of Joint and Sports Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, from December 2019 to June 2023. The analysis comprised two groups: 213 patients with both RCT and shoulder stiffness, and 193 patients without shoulder stiffness. A total of 21 potential risk factors associated with RCT and shoulder stiffness were considered, and a prediction model was developed using single-focus logistic regression analysis and multifocal logistic regression analysis in the training set (N=284), which was presented as nomograms. The validation set (N=122) was used to assess the model's discrimination, calibration and clinical practicability. The proportion of patients with RCT combined with shoulder stiffness in both the training set and the validation set was 52.5%.

Results: The study identified eight pertinent risk factors: gender, dominant side, smoking, hypothyroidism, depression, hyperlipidemia, type III acromion, and partial tear. Based on these factors, a clinical prediction model was developed. The model demonstrated excellent predictive performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.856 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.812-0.900] for the training set and 0.867 (95% CI: 0.807-0.928) for the validation set. Calibration curves exhibited strong agreement between the actual disease probabilities and predicted probabilities using the model in both datasets. Decision curve analysis (DCA) further confirmed the clinical utility of the model.

Conclusions: Based on routine data, the prediction model offers clinicians a simple and reliable tool for predicting the combination of RCT and shoulder stiffness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Joint
Annals of Joint ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
-25.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信