肩部手术区域麻醉的最新进展:叙述性回顾。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Annals of Joint Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/aoj-24-64
Jonathan D Harley, Alicia K Harrison, Allison J Rao
{"title":"肩部手术区域麻醉的最新进展:叙述性回顾。","authors":"Jonathan D Harley, Alicia K Harrison, Allison J Rao","doi":"10.21037/aoj-24-64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Perioperative pain management is of considerable interest in shoulder surgery due to its association with severe postoperative pain. Over time, regional anesthesia has become widely utilized in postoperative pain control. Because poor pain management after orthopedic surgery remains an issue, optimal utilization of regional anesthesia should continue to be a focus for shoulder surgeons. This review seeks to summarize the most commonly used regional anesthesia techniques in shoulder surgery while highlighting key innovations in these areas. Furthermore, it will appraise the available high-quality evidence on these topics, providing a snapshot of the most current practices and conclusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed was queried for studies published within the previous 20 years on topics of regional anesthesia procedures for shoulder surgery. The most recent high-quality studies-systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials-were prioritized for selection. Additional references were identified from the reference lists of these articles.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB), the supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCB), and the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) are at the forefront of regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery. ISB remains the gold standard, offering the most complete anesthesia. SCB and SSNB have important roles as well, having a lower risk of complications but the additional requirement of general anesthesia (GA). Continuous catheter infusion (CCI), while effective in extending analgesia, has fallen out of favor due to its safety concerns, such as catheter migration. Adjuvant medications have become more popular in recent years and have been shown to prolong nerve blockade, with intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine gaining significant traction. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a newer advancement, increases nerve block duration but has shown mixed evidence in improving patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional anesthesia plays a major role in postoperative pain management and has changed the landscape of how patients can recover from shoulder surgery. ISB, SCB, and SSNB techniques all have their place, each offering unique advantages and disadvantages. CCI and adjuvant medications have shown benefit, while LB requires further investigation. Future research should aim to refine regional anesthesia techniques to further improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44459,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Joint","volume":"10 ","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An update on regional anesthesia in shoulder surgery: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan D Harley, Alicia K Harrison, Allison J Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/aoj-24-64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Perioperative pain management is of considerable interest in shoulder surgery due to its association with severe postoperative pain. Over time, regional anesthesia has become widely utilized in postoperative pain control. Because poor pain management after orthopedic surgery remains an issue, optimal utilization of regional anesthesia should continue to be a focus for shoulder surgeons. This review seeks to summarize the most commonly used regional anesthesia techniques in shoulder surgery while highlighting key innovations in these areas. Furthermore, it will appraise the available high-quality evidence on these topics, providing a snapshot of the most current practices and conclusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed was queried for studies published within the previous 20 years on topics of regional anesthesia procedures for shoulder surgery. The most recent high-quality studies-systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials-were prioritized for selection. Additional references were identified from the reference lists of these articles.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB), the supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCB), and the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) are at the forefront of regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery. ISB remains the gold standard, offering the most complete anesthesia. SCB and SSNB have important roles as well, having a lower risk of complications but the additional requirement of general anesthesia (GA). Continuous catheter infusion (CCI), while effective in extending analgesia, has fallen out of favor due to its safety concerns, such as catheter migration. Adjuvant medications have become more popular in recent years and have been shown to prolong nerve blockade, with intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine gaining significant traction. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a newer advancement, increases nerve block duration but has shown mixed evidence in improving patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional anesthesia plays a major role in postoperative pain management and has changed the landscape of how patients can recover from shoulder surgery. ISB, SCB, and SSNB techniques all have their place, each offering unique advantages and disadvantages. CCI and adjuvant medications have shown benefit, while LB requires further investigation. Future research should aim to refine regional anesthesia techniques to further improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Joint\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336894/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Joint\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-24-64\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Joint","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-24-64","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:围手术期疼痛管理在肩关节手术中引起了相当大的兴趣,因为它与严重的术后疼痛有关。随着时间的推移,区域麻醉已广泛应用于术后疼痛控制。由于骨科手术后疼痛管理不善仍然是一个问题,区域麻醉的最佳利用应继续成为肩关节外科医生的重点。这篇综述旨在总结肩部手术中最常用的区域麻醉技术,同时强调这些领域的关键创新。此外,它将评估关于这些主题的现有高质量证据,提供最新实践和结论的快照。方法:在PubMed上查询过去20年内发表的关于肩部手术区域麻醉的研究。最新的高质量研究——系统综述、荟萃分析和随机对照试验——被优先选择。从这些文章的参考文献列表中确定了其他参考文献。关键内容和发现:斜角肌间臂丛阻滞(ISB)、锁骨上臂丛阻滞(SCB)和肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)是肩关节手术区域麻醉的前沿。ISB仍然是黄金标准,提供最完整的麻醉。SCB和SSNB也有重要作用,并发症风险较低,但需要全身麻醉(GA)。持续导管输注(Continuous catheter infusion, CCI)虽然能有效延长镇痛,但由于其存在导管移位等安全性问题,已不再受青睐。近年来,辅助治疗变得越来越流行,并且已被证明可以延长神经阻滞,静脉注射地塞米松和右美托咪定获得了显著的牵引。布比卡因脂质体(LB)是一种较新的进展,可延长神经阻滞持续时间,但在改善患者预后方面证据不一。结论:区域麻醉在肩部手术后疼痛管理中起着重要作用,并改变了患者如何从肩部手术中恢复的景观。ISB、SCB和SSNB技术都有自己的位置,每种技术都有独特的优点和缺点。CCI和辅助药物显示出益处,而LB需要进一步研究。未来的研究应旨在完善区域麻醉技术,以进一步改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An update on regional anesthesia in shoulder surgery: a narrative review.

Background and objective: Perioperative pain management is of considerable interest in shoulder surgery due to its association with severe postoperative pain. Over time, regional anesthesia has become widely utilized in postoperative pain control. Because poor pain management after orthopedic surgery remains an issue, optimal utilization of regional anesthesia should continue to be a focus for shoulder surgeons. This review seeks to summarize the most commonly used regional anesthesia techniques in shoulder surgery while highlighting key innovations in these areas. Furthermore, it will appraise the available high-quality evidence on these topics, providing a snapshot of the most current practices and conclusions.

Methods: PubMed was queried for studies published within the previous 20 years on topics of regional anesthesia procedures for shoulder surgery. The most recent high-quality studies-systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials-were prioritized for selection. Additional references were identified from the reference lists of these articles.

Key content and findings: The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB), the supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCB), and the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) are at the forefront of regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery. ISB remains the gold standard, offering the most complete anesthesia. SCB and SSNB have important roles as well, having a lower risk of complications but the additional requirement of general anesthesia (GA). Continuous catheter infusion (CCI), while effective in extending analgesia, has fallen out of favor due to its safety concerns, such as catheter migration. Adjuvant medications have become more popular in recent years and have been shown to prolong nerve blockade, with intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine gaining significant traction. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a newer advancement, increases nerve block duration but has shown mixed evidence in improving patient outcomes.

Conclusions: Regional anesthesia plays a major role in postoperative pain management and has changed the landscape of how patients can recover from shoulder surgery. ISB, SCB, and SSNB techniques all have their place, each offering unique advantages and disadvantages. CCI and adjuvant medications have shown benefit, while LB requires further investigation. Future research should aim to refine regional anesthesia techniques to further improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Joint
Annals of Joint ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
-25.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信