接触性运动中肩锁关节和胸锁关节损伤:保守和手术治疗的叙述回顾。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Annals of Joint Pub Date : 2025-07-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/aoj-25-19
Andrew J Moyal, Robert J Burkhart, Jeremy M Adelstein, James E Voos, John M Apostolakos, Jacob G Calcei
{"title":"接触性运动中肩锁关节和胸锁关节损伤:保守和手术治疗的叙述回顾。","authors":"Andrew J Moyal, Robert J Burkhart, Jeremy M Adelstein, James E Voos, John M Apostolakos, Jacob G Calcei","doi":"10.21037/aoj-25-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Acromioclavicular (AC) joint sprain and sternoclavicular (SC) joint injuries commonly occur in contact athletes due to the direct-blow mechanism of injury. Despite the high prevalence in this patient population, a small degree of literature on AC and SC joint injuries specifically pertain to contact athletes. The goal of this narrative review is to analyze the literature pertaining to AC and SC joint injuries in both contact athletes and the general population and to provide treatment recommendations specifically for the contact athlete.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of PubMed and MEDLINE was completed to identify articles reporting on the surgical and nonoperative treatment of AC and SC joint injuries in athletes. In this initial screen, the authors excluded general reviews, case reports, duplicate studies between databases and publications in languages other than English. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS). The authors then conducted a search for studies comparing non-operative to operative treatment of AC and SC joint injuries, in addition to studies comparing between operative technique.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Non-operative management of AC and SC joint injuries offer an acceptable return-to-play timeline. Despite persistent pathologic radiographic appearance in certain cases of non-operative management, clinical outcomes are generally equivalent between athletes treated non-operatively as compared to operatively. In cases of a failed course of nonoperative treatment, surgical management can achieve high return-to-sport rates, though is generally associated with longer recovery intervals. Despite mechanism of injury, rate of successful return to previous level does not appear to correlate with degree of contact in a sport, but instead with overhead demand of the sport.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contact athletes with AC and SC joint injuries should be trialed with a course of nonoperative management, even in higher grade injuries, with some exceptions. Athletes should be appropriately counseled, with particular attention paid to positions requiring increased overhead demand. When surgery is required, non-rigid anatomic fixation allows for a high rate of return to sport with less complications compared to rigid fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44459,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Joint","volume":"10 ","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joint injuries in contact sports: a narrative review of conservative and surgical treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J Moyal, Robert J Burkhart, Jeremy M Adelstein, James E Voos, John M Apostolakos, Jacob G Calcei\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/aoj-25-19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Acromioclavicular (AC) joint sprain and sternoclavicular (SC) joint injuries commonly occur in contact athletes due to the direct-blow mechanism of injury. Despite the high prevalence in this patient population, a small degree of literature on AC and SC joint injuries specifically pertain to contact athletes. The goal of this narrative review is to analyze the literature pertaining to AC and SC joint injuries in both contact athletes and the general population and to provide treatment recommendations specifically for the contact athlete.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of PubMed and MEDLINE was completed to identify articles reporting on the surgical and nonoperative treatment of AC and SC joint injuries in athletes. In this initial screen, the authors excluded general reviews, case reports, duplicate studies between databases and publications in languages other than English. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS). The authors then conducted a search for studies comparing non-operative to operative treatment of AC and SC joint injuries, in addition to studies comparing between operative technique.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Non-operative management of AC and SC joint injuries offer an acceptable return-to-play timeline. Despite persistent pathologic radiographic appearance in certain cases of non-operative management, clinical outcomes are generally equivalent between athletes treated non-operatively as compared to operatively. In cases of a failed course of nonoperative treatment, surgical management can achieve high return-to-sport rates, though is generally associated with longer recovery intervals. Despite mechanism of injury, rate of successful return to previous level does not appear to correlate with degree of contact in a sport, but instead with overhead demand of the sport.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contact athletes with AC and SC joint injuries should be trialed with a course of nonoperative management, even in higher grade injuries, with some exceptions. Athletes should be appropriately counseled, with particular attention paid to positions requiring increased overhead demand. When surgery is required, non-rigid anatomic fixation allows for a high rate of return to sport with less complications compared to rigid fixation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Joint\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Joint\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-25-19\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Joint","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-25-19","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:肩锁关节扭伤和胸锁关节损伤是接触性运动员中常见的直接打击损伤机制。尽管在这一患者群体中发病率很高,但关于AC和SC关节损伤的文献很少专门涉及接触性运动员。这篇叙述性综述的目的是分析与接触性运动员和一般人群中AC和SC关节损伤有关的文献,并为接触性运动员提供专门的治疗建议。方法:对PubMed和MEDLINE进行综述,以确定运动员AC和SC关节损伤的手术和非手术治疗的文章。在最初的筛选中,作者排除了一般综述、病例报告、数据库之间的重复研究和非英语出版物。纳入研究的质量采用非随机研究方法学指数(minor)进行评估。作者随后对AC和SC关节损伤非手术治疗与手术治疗的比较研究进行了检索,并对手术技术进行了比较研究。关键内容和发现:非手术治疗AC和SC关节损伤提供了一个可接受的恢复时间。尽管在某些情况下,非手术治疗的病理x线表现持续存在,但与手术治疗相比,非手术治疗的运动员的临床结果通常是相同的。在非手术治疗失败的情况下,手术治疗可以实现高的恢复率,尽管通常与较长的恢复间隔有关。尽管存在损伤机制,但成功恢复到先前水平的比率似乎与运动中的接触程度无关,而是与运动的头顶需求有关。结论:接触性AC和SC关节损伤的运动员应该接受一个疗程的非手术治疗,即使是更严重的损伤,也有一些例外。运动员应该得到适当的指导,特别注意需要增加头顶需求的姿势。当需要手术时,与刚性固定相比,非刚性解剖固定允许高的运动恢复率和较少的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joint injuries in contact sports: a narrative review of conservative and surgical treatments.

Background and objective: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint sprain and sternoclavicular (SC) joint injuries commonly occur in contact athletes due to the direct-blow mechanism of injury. Despite the high prevalence in this patient population, a small degree of literature on AC and SC joint injuries specifically pertain to contact athletes. The goal of this narrative review is to analyze the literature pertaining to AC and SC joint injuries in both contact athletes and the general population and to provide treatment recommendations specifically for the contact athlete.

Methods: A review of PubMed and MEDLINE was completed to identify articles reporting on the surgical and nonoperative treatment of AC and SC joint injuries in athletes. In this initial screen, the authors excluded general reviews, case reports, duplicate studies between databases and publications in languages other than English. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS). The authors then conducted a search for studies comparing non-operative to operative treatment of AC and SC joint injuries, in addition to studies comparing between operative technique.

Key content and findings: Non-operative management of AC and SC joint injuries offer an acceptable return-to-play timeline. Despite persistent pathologic radiographic appearance in certain cases of non-operative management, clinical outcomes are generally equivalent between athletes treated non-operatively as compared to operatively. In cases of a failed course of nonoperative treatment, surgical management can achieve high return-to-sport rates, though is generally associated with longer recovery intervals. Despite mechanism of injury, rate of successful return to previous level does not appear to correlate with degree of contact in a sport, but instead with overhead demand of the sport.

Conclusions: Contact athletes with AC and SC joint injuries should be trialed with a course of nonoperative management, even in higher grade injuries, with some exceptions. Athletes should be appropriately counseled, with particular attention paid to positions requiring increased overhead demand. When surgery is required, non-rigid anatomic fixation allows for a high rate of return to sport with less complications compared to rigid fixation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Joint
Annals of Joint ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
-25.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信