生物膜靶向治疗在管理和预防龋齿方面的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析的方案。

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Venkata Suresh Venkataiah, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari
{"title":"生物膜靶向治疗在管理和预防龋齿方面的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析的方案。","authors":"Venkata Suresh Venkataiah, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02921-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental caries is a biofilm-dependent disease that continues to challenge conventional preventive strategies, such as fluoride application and mechanical plaque removal. Biofilm-targeted therapies (BTT), including probiotics, photodynamic therapy, enzymatic treatments, and natural compounds, represent promising alternatives to disrupt pathogenic biofilms effectively. However, the available evidence remains fragmented, with inconsistent methodologies and limited clinical data hindering comprehensive conclusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis will synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of BTT in preventing and managing dental caries. A comprehensive search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library will identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating BTT interventions. To ensure methodological robustness, quantitative synthesis of intervention effectiveness will be restricted to RCTs, while observational studies will contribute to a structured narrative synthesis. Two independent reviewers will conduct study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the RoB 2 tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I for observational studies. Where feasible, pairwise meta-analyses will be performed using random-effects models. If sufficient data are available, a network meta-analysis (NMA) will be considered. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will explore the impact of age, caries risk level, and intervention type on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review anticipates providing evidence on the efficacy of BTT in reducing bacterial load, altering biofilm composition, and preventing caries progression. Variability in study design and outcome measures is expected, underscoring the need for standardized methodologies and more robust clinical trials. The findings aim to deliver evidence-based insights into the clinical applicability of BTT, addressing current knowledge gaps and guiding future research toward more effective caries prevention and management strategies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024615568.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of biofilm-targeted therapy in managing and preventing dental caries: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Venkata Suresh Venkataiah, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02921-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental caries is a biofilm-dependent disease that continues to challenge conventional preventive strategies, such as fluoride application and mechanical plaque removal. Biofilm-targeted therapies (BTT), including probiotics, photodynamic therapy, enzymatic treatments, and natural compounds, represent promising alternatives to disrupt pathogenic biofilms effectively. However, the available evidence remains fragmented, with inconsistent methodologies and limited clinical data hindering comprehensive conclusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis will synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of BTT in preventing and managing dental caries. A comprehensive search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library will identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating BTT interventions. To ensure methodological robustness, quantitative synthesis of intervention effectiveness will be restricted to RCTs, while observational studies will contribute to a structured narrative synthesis. Two independent reviewers will conduct study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the RoB 2 tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I for observational studies. Where feasible, pairwise meta-analyses will be performed using random-effects models. If sufficient data are available, a network meta-analysis (NMA) will be considered. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will explore the impact of age, caries risk level, and intervention type on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review anticipates providing evidence on the efficacy of BTT in reducing bacterial load, altering biofilm composition, and preventing caries progression. Variability in study design and outcome measures is expected, underscoring the need for standardized methodologies and more robust clinical trials. The findings aim to deliver evidence-based insights into the clinical applicability of BTT, addressing current knowledge gaps and guiding future research toward more effective caries prevention and management strategies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024615568.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337361/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02921-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02921-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:龋齿是一种依赖生物膜的疾病,不断挑战传统的预防策略,如氟化物应用和机械牙菌斑清除。生物膜靶向治疗(BTT),包括益生菌、光动力治疗、酶治疗和天然化合物,是有效破坏致病性生物膜的有希望的替代方法。然而,现有的证据仍然是碎片化的,方法不一致和有限的临床数据阻碍了全面的结论。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析将综合BTT在预防和治疗龋病中的有效性的证据。对PubMed (MEDLINE)、Embase和Cochrane图书馆的全面检索将确定评估BTT干预的随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究。为了确保方法的稳健性,干预有效性的定量综合将仅限于随机对照试验,而观察性研究将有助于结构化叙事综合。两名独立审稿人将进行研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估,随机对照试验使用RoB 2工具,观察性研究使用ROBINS-I工具。在可行的情况下,将使用随机效应模型进行两两荟萃分析。如果有足够的数据,将考虑网络元分析(NMA)。亚组分析和敏感性分析将探讨年龄、龋齿风险水平和干预类型对治疗结果的影响。讨论:本综述旨在为BTT在减少细菌负荷、改变生物膜组成和预防龋齿进展方面的功效提供证据。研究设计和结果测量的可变性是预期的,强调需要标准化的方法和更强大的临床试验。研究结果旨在为BTT的临床适用性提供基于证据的见解,解决当前的知识空白,并指导未来研究更有效的龋齿预防和管理策略。试验注册:系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42024615568。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of biofilm-targeted therapy in managing and preventing dental caries: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Dental caries is a biofilm-dependent disease that continues to challenge conventional preventive strategies, such as fluoride application and mechanical plaque removal. Biofilm-targeted therapies (BTT), including probiotics, photodynamic therapy, enzymatic treatments, and natural compounds, represent promising alternatives to disrupt pathogenic biofilms effectively. However, the available evidence remains fragmented, with inconsistent methodologies and limited clinical data hindering comprehensive conclusions.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis will synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of BTT in preventing and managing dental caries. A comprehensive search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library will identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating BTT interventions. To ensure methodological robustness, quantitative synthesis of intervention effectiveness will be restricted to RCTs, while observational studies will contribute to a structured narrative synthesis. Two independent reviewers will conduct study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the RoB 2 tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I for observational studies. Where feasible, pairwise meta-analyses will be performed using random-effects models. If sufficient data are available, a network meta-analysis (NMA) will be considered. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will explore the impact of age, caries risk level, and intervention type on treatment outcomes.

Discussion: This review anticipates providing evidence on the efficacy of BTT in reducing bacterial load, altering biofilm composition, and preventing caries progression. Variability in study design and outcome measures is expected, underscoring the need for standardized methodologies and more robust clinical trials. The findings aim to deliver evidence-based insights into the clinical applicability of BTT, addressing current knowledge gaps and guiding future research toward more effective caries prevention and management strategies.

Trial registration: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024615568.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信