卵巢刺激方案在新鲜周期和选择性冷冻周期。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANDROLOGY
Ioannis E Messinis, Christina I Messini, George Anifandis
{"title":"卵巢刺激方案在新鲜周期和选择性冷冻周期。","authors":"Ioannis E Messinis, Christina I Messini, George Anifandis","doi":"10.1080/19396368.2025.2540280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ovarian stimulation is applied to women undergoing IVF treatment with the aim of selecting more than one follicle. Until a few years ago, fresh embryo transfer was the norm, but not without the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). In recent years, vitrification has allowed the successful freezing of all oocytes or embryos, thus favoring multiple embryo transfer in subsequent thawing cycles and eliminating the risk of OHSS. Certainly, excess embryos from fresh embryo transfer cycles can be also frozen and thawed in future transfers. In terms of the number of oocytes needed, research in recent years has shown differences between fresh embryo transfer cycles and elective freezing of all embryos, termed elective freeze-all cycles, with the fresh cycle requiring an optimal number to avoid OHSS, while in elective freeze-all cycles there appear to be no specific upper limit. Consequently, the approach to ovarian stimulation may also differ between the two types of cycles. Although GnRH antagonists are used in both cycles, in elective freezing cycles progestins tend to replace antagonists in preventing the endogenous LH surge. However, it is unclear whether prevention of the LH surge is required in such cycles, since luteinization affecting the endometrium is not clinically relevant, as no embryo transfer occurs. This narrative review describes the current experience in ovarian stimulation for IVF, highlighting the differences between fresh and elective freeze-all cycles and the potentially different approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":22184,"journal":{"name":"Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine","volume":"71 1","pages":"307-329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ovarian stimulation protocols in fresh cycles and in elective freeze-all cycles.\",\"authors\":\"Ioannis E Messinis, Christina I Messini, George Anifandis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19396368.2025.2540280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ovarian stimulation is applied to women undergoing IVF treatment with the aim of selecting more than one follicle. Until a few years ago, fresh embryo transfer was the norm, but not without the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). In recent years, vitrification has allowed the successful freezing of all oocytes or embryos, thus favoring multiple embryo transfer in subsequent thawing cycles and eliminating the risk of OHSS. Certainly, excess embryos from fresh embryo transfer cycles can be also frozen and thawed in future transfers. In terms of the number of oocytes needed, research in recent years has shown differences between fresh embryo transfer cycles and elective freezing of all embryos, termed elective freeze-all cycles, with the fresh cycle requiring an optimal number to avoid OHSS, while in elective freeze-all cycles there appear to be no specific upper limit. Consequently, the approach to ovarian stimulation may also differ between the two types of cycles. Although GnRH antagonists are used in both cycles, in elective freezing cycles progestins tend to replace antagonists in preventing the endogenous LH surge. However, it is unclear whether prevention of the LH surge is required in such cycles, since luteinization affecting the endometrium is not clinically relevant, as no embryo transfer occurs. This narrative review describes the current experience in ovarian stimulation for IVF, highlighting the differences between fresh and elective freeze-all cycles and the potentially different approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"307-329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2025.2540280\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2025.2540280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卵巢刺激适用于接受体外受精治疗的妇女,目的是选择多个卵泡。直到几年前,新鲜胚胎移植是一种常态,但并非没有卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)的风险。近年来,玻璃化技术使所有卵母细胞或胚胎都能成功冷冻,从而有利于在随后的解冻周期中进行多胚胎移植,并消除OHSS的风险。当然,来自新鲜胚胎移植周期的多余胚胎也可以在未来的移植中冷冻和解冻。在所需卵母细胞数量方面,近年来的研究表明,新鲜胚胎移植周期和选择性冷冻全胚胎之间存在差异,称为选择性冷冻全周期,新鲜周期需要一个最佳数量以避免OHSS,而选择性冷冻全周期似乎没有特定的上限。因此,刺激卵巢的方法也可能在两种类型的周期之间有所不同。虽然GnRH拮抗剂在两个周期中都使用,但在选择性冷冻周期中,黄体酮倾向于取代拮抗剂来防止内源性LH激增。然而,目前尚不清楚在这样的周期中是否需要预防黄体生成素激增,因为黄体生成素影响子宫内膜与临床无关,因为没有发生胚胎移植。这篇叙述性综述描述了目前体外受精卵巢刺激的经验,强调了新鲜周期和选择性全冷冻周期之间的差异以及潜在的不同方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ovarian stimulation protocols in fresh cycles and in elective freeze-all cycles.

Ovarian stimulation is applied to women undergoing IVF treatment with the aim of selecting more than one follicle. Until a few years ago, fresh embryo transfer was the norm, but not without the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). In recent years, vitrification has allowed the successful freezing of all oocytes or embryos, thus favoring multiple embryo transfer in subsequent thawing cycles and eliminating the risk of OHSS. Certainly, excess embryos from fresh embryo transfer cycles can be also frozen and thawed in future transfers. In terms of the number of oocytes needed, research in recent years has shown differences between fresh embryo transfer cycles and elective freezing of all embryos, termed elective freeze-all cycles, with the fresh cycle requiring an optimal number to avoid OHSS, while in elective freeze-all cycles there appear to be no specific upper limit. Consequently, the approach to ovarian stimulation may also differ between the two types of cycles. Although GnRH antagonists are used in both cycles, in elective freezing cycles progestins tend to replace antagonists in preventing the endogenous LH surge. However, it is unclear whether prevention of the LH surge is required in such cycles, since luteinization affecting the endometrium is not clinically relevant, as no embryo transfer occurs. This narrative review describes the current experience in ovarian stimulation for IVF, highlighting the differences between fresh and elective freeze-all cycles and the potentially different approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, SBiRM, publishes Research Articles, Communications, Applications Notes that include protocols a Clinical Corner that includes case reports, Review Articles and Hypotheses and Letters to the Editor on human and animal reproduction. The journal will highlight the use of systems approaches including genomic, cellular, proteomic, metabolomic, bioinformatic, molecular, and biochemical, to address fundamental questions in reproductive biology, reproductive medicine, and translational research. The journal publishes research involving human and animal gametes, stem cells, developmental biology and toxicology, and clinical care in reproductive medicine. Specific areas of interest to the journal include: male factor infertility and germ cell biology, reproductive technologies (gamete micro-manipulation and cryopreservation, in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET) and contraception. Research that is directed towards developing new or enhanced technologies for clinical medicine or scientific research in reproduction is of significant interest to the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信