含粉软土中火车站深基坑开挖变形规律分析。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Weijian Liu, Zhonghe Wang, Zhizeng Zhang, Zhengyu Zhang, Yongfu Jia, Zhun Li
{"title":"含粉软土中火车站深基坑开挖变形规律分析。","authors":"Weijian Liu, Zhonghe Wang, Zhizeng Zhang, Zhengyu Zhang, Yongfu Jia, Zhun Li","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-15139-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the behavior of retaining structures and the settlement of external surfaces in deep foundation pits located in areas characterized by muddy soft soil. The research evaluates the efficacy of two constitutive models-the traditional Mohr-Coulomb model and the modified Cambridge model-during the simulation of foundation pit excavation. By analyzing actual monitoring data collected from the site, the study identifies patterns in the settlement and deformation of both the retaining structure and the surface. Subsequently, the excavation process of the foundation pit is simulated using FLAC3D 6.0 software, employing both the Mohr-Coulomb and modified Cambridge models. A comparative analysis is conducted between the simulation results and the field monitoring data to assess the performance of the two models.The findings indicate that the horizontal displacement and surface settlement curves of the retaining structure in muddy soft soil exhibit cantilever behavior. The maximum horizontal displacement occurs near the excavation face, while the peak surface settlement is observed 15 m from the foundation pit, remaining within the established early warning thresholds. Although both models demonstrate a similar trend in the simulated displacement curves compared to the actual deformation curves, there are notable differences in accuracy. Specifically, the modified Cambridge model generally exhibits a lower error rate in simulating the horizontal displacement of the retaining structure compared to the traditional Mohr-Coulomb model. Furthermore, the modified Cambridge model provides a closer approximation to the measured values for surface settlement outside the foundation pit.In conclusion, for deep foundation pits associated with subway construction that utilize concrete support and underground continuous walls in muddy soft soil regions, the horizontal displacement and surface settlement curves of the retaining structure display cantilever characteristics. The modified Cambridge model demonstrates superior simulation performance, yielding results that are more closely aligned with actual monitoring data.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"29383"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of deformation rule of deep foundation pit excavation of railway station in soft soil with silt.\",\"authors\":\"Weijian Liu, Zhonghe Wang, Zhizeng Zhang, Zhengyu Zhang, Yongfu Jia, Zhun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-15139-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates the behavior of retaining structures and the settlement of external surfaces in deep foundation pits located in areas characterized by muddy soft soil. The research evaluates the efficacy of two constitutive models-the traditional Mohr-Coulomb model and the modified Cambridge model-during the simulation of foundation pit excavation. By analyzing actual monitoring data collected from the site, the study identifies patterns in the settlement and deformation of both the retaining structure and the surface. Subsequently, the excavation process of the foundation pit is simulated using FLAC3D 6.0 software, employing both the Mohr-Coulomb and modified Cambridge models. A comparative analysis is conducted between the simulation results and the field monitoring data to assess the performance of the two models.The findings indicate that the horizontal displacement and surface settlement curves of the retaining structure in muddy soft soil exhibit cantilever behavior. The maximum horizontal displacement occurs near the excavation face, while the peak surface settlement is observed 15 m from the foundation pit, remaining within the established early warning thresholds. Although both models demonstrate a similar trend in the simulated displacement curves compared to the actual deformation curves, there are notable differences in accuracy. Specifically, the modified Cambridge model generally exhibits a lower error rate in simulating the horizontal displacement of the retaining structure compared to the traditional Mohr-Coulomb model. Furthermore, the modified Cambridge model provides a closer approximation to the measured values for surface settlement outside the foundation pit.In conclusion, for deep foundation pits associated with subway construction that utilize concrete support and underground continuous walls in muddy soft soil regions, the horizontal displacement and surface settlement curves of the retaining structure display cantilever characteristics. The modified Cambridge model demonstrates superior simulation performance, yielding results that are more closely aligned with actual monitoring data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"29383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340129/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15139-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15139-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了位于泥质软土特征地区的深基坑支护结构及其外表面沉降。对传统的莫尔-库仑模型和修正的剑桥模型两种本构模型在基坑开挖模拟中的有效性进行了评价。通过对现场实际监测数据的分析,研究确定了支护结构和地表的沉降和变形规律。随后,利用FLAC3D 6.0软件,采用Mohr-Coulomb模型和修正的Cambridge模型对基坑开挖过程进行了模拟。将模拟结果与现场监测数据进行对比分析,评价两种模型的性能。研究结果表明:泥质软土中挡土结构的水平位移和地表沉降曲线表现为悬臂行为;最大水平位移发生在开挖工作面附近,地表沉降峰值出现在距基坑15 m处,处于既定预警阈值范围内。虽然两种模型的模拟位移曲线与实际变形曲线的趋势相似,但在精度上存在显著差异。具体而言,与传统的莫尔-库仑模型相比,修正的剑桥模型在模拟挡土墙结构水平位移时普遍具有较低的错误率。此外,修正的剑桥模型更接近于基坑外地表沉降的实测值。综上所述,在泥质软土地基地区,采用混凝土支护和地下连续墙的地铁深基坑支护结构水平位移和地表沉降曲线呈现悬臂悬臂特征。改进后的Cambridge模型具有较好的模拟性能,其结果与实际监测数据更加接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of deformation rule of deep foundation pit excavation of railway station in soft soil with silt.

This study investigates the behavior of retaining structures and the settlement of external surfaces in deep foundation pits located in areas characterized by muddy soft soil. The research evaluates the efficacy of two constitutive models-the traditional Mohr-Coulomb model and the modified Cambridge model-during the simulation of foundation pit excavation. By analyzing actual monitoring data collected from the site, the study identifies patterns in the settlement and deformation of both the retaining structure and the surface. Subsequently, the excavation process of the foundation pit is simulated using FLAC3D 6.0 software, employing both the Mohr-Coulomb and modified Cambridge models. A comparative analysis is conducted between the simulation results and the field monitoring data to assess the performance of the two models.The findings indicate that the horizontal displacement and surface settlement curves of the retaining structure in muddy soft soil exhibit cantilever behavior. The maximum horizontal displacement occurs near the excavation face, while the peak surface settlement is observed 15 m from the foundation pit, remaining within the established early warning thresholds. Although both models demonstrate a similar trend in the simulated displacement curves compared to the actual deformation curves, there are notable differences in accuracy. Specifically, the modified Cambridge model generally exhibits a lower error rate in simulating the horizontal displacement of the retaining structure compared to the traditional Mohr-Coulomb model. Furthermore, the modified Cambridge model provides a closer approximation to the measured values for surface settlement outside the foundation pit.In conclusion, for deep foundation pits associated with subway construction that utilize concrete support and underground continuous walls in muddy soft soil regions, the horizontal displacement and surface settlement curves of the retaining structure display cantilever characteristics. The modified Cambridge model demonstrates superior simulation performance, yielding results that are more closely aligned with actual monitoring data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信