竖脊肌平面阻滞和腰方肌阻滞对腹腔镜肾手术术后阿片类药物消耗的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2025-08-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/8869716
Skladzien Tomasz, Maciejewski Pawel, Cicio Michal, Wojciech Szpunar, Szpor Jan, Lonc Tomasz, Kwinta Anna, Bugielska Renata, Szkudlarek Olga, Drygalski Tomasz, Terlecki Michal
{"title":"竖脊肌平面阻滞和腰方肌阻滞对腹腔镜肾手术术后阿片类药物消耗的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Skladzien Tomasz, Maciejewski Pawel, Cicio Michal, Wojciech Szpunar, Szpor Jan, Lonc Tomasz, Kwinta Anna, Bugielska Renata, Szkudlarek Olga, Drygalski Tomasz, Terlecki Michal","doi":"10.1155/prm/8869716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and erector spinae plane (ESP) block are relatively new regional analgesic techniques that provide analgesia to the abdominal wall and reduce postoperative opioid consumption. We compared the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided bilateral ESP block versus bilateral QLB in patients undergoing laparoscopic kidney surgery. <b>Methods:</b> Adult patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) within the study period were included. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group I received an ultrasound-guided ESP block with 30 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine on each side and group II received an ultrasound-guided QLB 1 with 30 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine on each side. <b>Results:</b> A total of 84 patients were included, with 45 patients in the ESP block group and 39 in the QLB group. The mean dosage of oxycodone in the ESP block group was 22.66 mg and in the QLB group was 22.66 mg. There was no difference in oxycodone consumption within the first 24 h after surgery between the groups (<i>p</i>=0.77). <b>Conclusion:</b> The effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral QLB and ESP blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic kidney surgery was found to be similar in terms of postoperative pain and opioid consumption. There were no significant differences between the blocks in opioid consumption or pain scores. Both techniques appear to be effective and safe components of multimodal analgesia strategy for laparoscopic nephrectomy. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05446727.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8869716"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Laparoscopic Kidney Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Skladzien Tomasz, Maciejewski Pawel, Cicio Michal, Wojciech Szpunar, Szpor Jan, Lonc Tomasz, Kwinta Anna, Bugielska Renata, Szkudlarek Olga, Drygalski Tomasz, Terlecki Michal\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/prm/8869716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and erector spinae plane (ESP) block are relatively new regional analgesic techniques that provide analgesia to the abdominal wall and reduce postoperative opioid consumption. We compared the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided bilateral ESP block versus bilateral QLB in patients undergoing laparoscopic kidney surgery. <b>Methods:</b> Adult patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) within the study period were included. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group I received an ultrasound-guided ESP block with 30 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine on each side and group II received an ultrasound-guided QLB 1 with 30 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine on each side. <b>Results:</b> A total of 84 patients were included, with 45 patients in the ESP block group and 39 in the QLB group. The mean dosage of oxycodone in the ESP block group was 22.66 mg and in the QLB group was 22.66 mg. There was no difference in oxycodone consumption within the first 24 h after surgery between the groups (<i>p</i>=0.77). <b>Conclusion:</b> The effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral QLB and ESP blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic kidney surgery was found to be similar in terms of postoperative pain and opioid consumption. There were no significant differences between the blocks in opioid consumption or pain scores. Both techniques appear to be effective and safe components of multimodal analgesia strategy for laparoscopic nephrectomy. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05446727.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"8869716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/8869716\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/8869716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰方肌阻滞(QLB)和脊直肌平面阻滞(ESP)是一种相对较新的局部镇痛技术,可提供腹壁镇痛并减少术后阿片类药物的消耗。我们比较了超声引导下双侧ESP阻滞与双侧QLB在腹腔镜肾手术患者中的有效性。方法:纳入研究期间接受腹腔镜肾切除术或保留肾元手术(NSS)的成年患者。患者被随机分为两组:第一组接受超声引导的ESP阻滞,每侧30 mL 0.35%罗哌卡因;第二组接受超声引导的QLB 1阻滞,每侧30 mL 0.35%罗哌卡因。结果:共纳入84例患者,其中ESP阻滞组45例,QLB组39例。ESP阻滞组羟考酮平均剂量为22.66 mg, QLB组平均剂量为22.66 mg。两组术后24 h内羟考酮用量差异无统计学意义(p=0.77)。结论:超声引导下双侧QLB阻滞和ESP阻滞对腹腔镜肾手术患者术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗的影响相似。两组在阿片类药物消耗和疼痛评分方面没有显著差异。这两种技术似乎是腹腔镜肾切除术多模式镇痛策略的有效和安全的组成部分。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05446727。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Laparoscopic Kidney Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background: The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and erector spinae plane (ESP) block are relatively new regional analgesic techniques that provide analgesia to the abdominal wall and reduce postoperative opioid consumption. We compared the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided bilateral ESP block versus bilateral QLB in patients undergoing laparoscopic kidney surgery. Methods: Adult patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) within the study period were included. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group I received an ultrasound-guided ESP block with 30 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine on each side and group II received an ultrasound-guided QLB 1 with 30 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine on each side. Results: A total of 84 patients were included, with 45 patients in the ESP block group and 39 in the QLB group. The mean dosage of oxycodone in the ESP block group was 22.66 mg and in the QLB group was 22.66 mg. There was no difference in oxycodone consumption within the first 24 h after surgery between the groups (p=0.77). Conclusion: The effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral QLB and ESP blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic kidney surgery was found to be similar in terms of postoperative pain and opioid consumption. There were no significant differences between the blocks in opioid consumption or pain scores. Both techniques appear to be effective and safe components of multimodal analgesia strategy for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05446727.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信