全细胞和非细胞百日咳疫苗免疫反应的系统生物学评价。

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Mariana Leguia, Antón Vila-Sanjurjo, Diana Juarez, Alejandra Garcia-Glaessner, Ana I Gil, Mayita Alvarez, Rubelio Cornejo, Sami Cherikh, Casey E Gelber, Johannes B Goll, Leigh M Howard, Natalia Jimenez-Truque, Kathryn M Edwards, C Buddy Creech, Claudio F Lanata
{"title":"全细胞和非细胞百日咳疫苗免疫反应的系统生物学评价。","authors":"Mariana Leguia, Antón Vila-Sanjurjo, Diana Juarez, Alejandra Garcia-Glaessner, Ana I Gil, Mayita Alvarez, Rubelio Cornejo, Sami Cherikh, Casey E Gelber, Johannes B Goll, Leigh M Howard, Natalia Jimenez-Truque, Kathryn M Edwards, C Buddy Creech, Claudio F Lanata","doi":"10.1038/s41541-025-01121-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the local and systemic adverse reactions associated with whole-cell pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DTP), acellular pertussis vaccines combined with the same toxoids (DTaP) were developed in the 1990s. In comparison to DTP, DTaP vaccines demonstrated reduced reactogenicity and equivalent or improved immunogenicity and efficacy. However, there has been a resurgence of pertussis disease, particularly in DTaP-vaccinated children, suggesting that immunity wanes more quickly with DTaP vaccination. To elucidate the differences in immune responses to DTP and DTaP vaccines, we employed a systems biology-based strategy to compare global changes in gene expression following primary vaccination with either DTP or DTaP. We used RNA-Seq and ribosome profiling (RP) to identify transcriptional and translational signatures, respectively, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected from 50 infant recipients of DTP or DTaP at two time-points (baseline (pre-vaccination at Day 1) and either Day 2 or 8 post-vaccination). We also used standard serologic methods to assess immunogenicity, and correlated these results with transcriptional and translational signatures. Here, we provide a detailed description of the rationale, experimental design, methodology, and enrollment procedures used. Given the technical complexity of our approach, our objective is to fill knowledge gaps, describe key quality metrics, and support future publications. In brief, we recovered 4-12 million PBMCs (average 8.9 million) with 99% viability per 2.5 mL blood sample, enabling excellent nucleic acid recovery yields for the preparation of high-quality sequencing libraries. In turn, these generated RNA-Seq and RP datasets with sufficient genome coverage breadth and depth to enable differential gene expression analyses, demonstrating the validity of this approach to study pertussis vaccine immunology specifically, and its utility to characterize mechanisms of the human immune response to vaccination generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":19335,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Vaccines","volume":"10 1","pages":"188"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systems biology-based assessment of immune responses to whole cell and acellular pertussis vaccines.\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Leguia, Antón Vila-Sanjurjo, Diana Juarez, Alejandra Garcia-Glaessner, Ana I Gil, Mayita Alvarez, Rubelio Cornejo, Sami Cherikh, Casey E Gelber, Johannes B Goll, Leigh M Howard, Natalia Jimenez-Truque, Kathryn M Edwards, C Buddy Creech, Claudio F Lanata\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41541-025-01121-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Given the local and systemic adverse reactions associated with whole-cell pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DTP), acellular pertussis vaccines combined with the same toxoids (DTaP) were developed in the 1990s. In comparison to DTP, DTaP vaccines demonstrated reduced reactogenicity and equivalent or improved immunogenicity and efficacy. However, there has been a resurgence of pertussis disease, particularly in DTaP-vaccinated children, suggesting that immunity wanes more quickly with DTaP vaccination. To elucidate the differences in immune responses to DTP and DTaP vaccines, we employed a systems biology-based strategy to compare global changes in gene expression following primary vaccination with either DTP or DTaP. We used RNA-Seq and ribosome profiling (RP) to identify transcriptional and translational signatures, respectively, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected from 50 infant recipients of DTP or DTaP at two time-points (baseline (pre-vaccination at Day 1) and either Day 2 or 8 post-vaccination). We also used standard serologic methods to assess immunogenicity, and correlated these results with transcriptional and translational signatures. Here, we provide a detailed description of the rationale, experimental design, methodology, and enrollment procedures used. Given the technical complexity of our approach, our objective is to fill knowledge gaps, describe key quality metrics, and support future publications. In brief, we recovered 4-12 million PBMCs (average 8.9 million) with 99% viability per 2.5 mL blood sample, enabling excellent nucleic acid recovery yields for the preparation of high-quality sequencing libraries. In turn, these generated RNA-Seq and RP datasets with sufficient genome coverage breadth and depth to enable differential gene expression analyses, demonstrating the validity of this approach to study pertussis vaccine immunology specifically, and its utility to characterize mechanisms of the human immune response to vaccination generally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Vaccines\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340147/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Vaccines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-025-01121-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-025-01121-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到与白喉和破伤风类毒素(DTP)联合使用的全细胞百日咳疫苗存在局部和全身不良反应,20世纪90年代开发了与相同类毒素(DTaP)联合使用的无细胞百日咳疫苗。与百白破相比,DTaP疫苗的反应原性降低,免疫原性和效力相同或提高。然而,百日咳卷土重来,特别是在接种过百日咳疫苗的儿童中,这表明接种过百日咳疫苗的儿童免疫力下降得更快。为了阐明DTP和DTaP疫苗免疫应答的差异,我们采用了基于系统生物学的策略来比较首次接种DTP或DTaP疫苗后基因表达的全球变化。我们使用RNA-Seq和核糖体分析(RP)分别鉴定了在两个时间点(基线(接种前第1天)和接种后第2天或第8天)收集的50名DTP或DTaP婴儿外周血单个核细胞(PBMCs)的转录和翻译特征。我们还使用标准血清学方法来评估免疫原性,并将这些结果与转录和翻译特征相关联。在这里,我们提供了一个详细的描述的基本原理,实验设计,方法和登记程序使用。考虑到我们方法的技术复杂性,我们的目标是填补知识空白,描述关键的质量指标,并支持未来的出版物。简而言之,我们每2.5 mL血液样本回收了400 - 1200万个pbmc(平均890万个),存活率为99%,为制备高质量的测序文库提供了良好的核酸回收率。反过来,这些生成的RNA-Seq和RP数据集具有足够的基因组覆盖广度和深度,可以进行差异基因表达分析,证明了这种方法在研究百日咳疫苗免疫学方面的有效性,以及它在描述人类免疫应答机制方面的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systems biology-based assessment of immune responses to whole cell and acellular pertussis vaccines.

Given the local and systemic adverse reactions associated with whole-cell pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DTP), acellular pertussis vaccines combined with the same toxoids (DTaP) were developed in the 1990s. In comparison to DTP, DTaP vaccines demonstrated reduced reactogenicity and equivalent or improved immunogenicity and efficacy. However, there has been a resurgence of pertussis disease, particularly in DTaP-vaccinated children, suggesting that immunity wanes more quickly with DTaP vaccination. To elucidate the differences in immune responses to DTP and DTaP vaccines, we employed a systems biology-based strategy to compare global changes in gene expression following primary vaccination with either DTP or DTaP. We used RNA-Seq and ribosome profiling (RP) to identify transcriptional and translational signatures, respectively, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected from 50 infant recipients of DTP or DTaP at two time-points (baseline (pre-vaccination at Day 1) and either Day 2 or 8 post-vaccination). We also used standard serologic methods to assess immunogenicity, and correlated these results with transcriptional and translational signatures. Here, we provide a detailed description of the rationale, experimental design, methodology, and enrollment procedures used. Given the technical complexity of our approach, our objective is to fill knowledge gaps, describe key quality metrics, and support future publications. In brief, we recovered 4-12 million PBMCs (average 8.9 million) with 99% viability per 2.5 mL blood sample, enabling excellent nucleic acid recovery yields for the preparation of high-quality sequencing libraries. In turn, these generated RNA-Seq and RP datasets with sufficient genome coverage breadth and depth to enable differential gene expression analyses, demonstrating the validity of this approach to study pertussis vaccine immunology specifically, and its utility to characterize mechanisms of the human immune response to vaccination generally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Vaccines
NPJ Vaccines Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
146
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Online-only and open access, npj Vaccines is dedicated to highlighting the most important scientific advances in vaccine research and development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信