家庭住院:第一年在公立医院的经验。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Medicina-buenos Aires Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Matías Mirofsky, Gisella Gregori, Marianela Garrido, Irina Casariego, Julia Fernandes Seixo, Viviana Martinez, Diego Brunet, Gabriela Harguindeguy
{"title":"家庭住院:第一年在公立医院的经验。","authors":"Matías Mirofsky, Gisella Gregori, Marianela Garrido, Irina Casariego, Julia Fernandes Seixo, Viviana Martinez, Diego Brunet, Gabriela Harguindeguy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Home Hospitalization (HH) is a modality of home care with benefits for the health system, patients, families, and with few experiences in our country. In this paper, we present the results of the first year in a public hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study. Patients older than 17 years with acute and clinically stable diseases were included. We analyzed their clinical characteristics, days of hospitalization, mortality, readmission, and patient and family satisfaction surveys. The cost analysis is general, per day/bed, and variable due to the progressive incorporation of human resources and increase of available beds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total 276 patients were hospitalized, 51% women, median age 65 years, median number of days of hospitalization 4 and mean Charlson Index 4. The percentage of readmissions was 17.2% and mortality 6.7% at 30 days. Satisfaction surveys were completed by 28.6% of patients and 13.1% of family members: 96-100% reported that they considered all the points evaluated as very good/good. 90-95% stated that they would choose this modality again, that they would recommend this modality, and that they preferred it to hospitalization. The HH cost per bed day was 70% higher than the medical clinic cost per bed day.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>HH is feasible to implement and accepted in our setting. Its initial costs were higher than those in the medical clinic, but should be re-evaluated in the long term, if bed capacity and human resources remain constant.</p>","PeriodicalId":18419,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-buenos Aires","volume":"85 4","pages":"682-690"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home hospitalization: first year of experience in a public hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Matías Mirofsky, Gisella Gregori, Marianela Garrido, Irina Casariego, Julia Fernandes Seixo, Viviana Martinez, Diego Brunet, Gabriela Harguindeguy\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Home Hospitalization (HH) is a modality of home care with benefits for the health system, patients, families, and with few experiences in our country. In this paper, we present the results of the first year in a public hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study. Patients older than 17 years with acute and clinically stable diseases were included. We analyzed their clinical characteristics, days of hospitalization, mortality, readmission, and patient and family satisfaction surveys. The cost analysis is general, per day/bed, and variable due to the progressive incorporation of human resources and increase of available beds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total 276 patients were hospitalized, 51% women, median age 65 years, median number of days of hospitalization 4 and mean Charlson Index 4. The percentage of readmissions was 17.2% and mortality 6.7% at 30 days. Satisfaction surveys were completed by 28.6% of patients and 13.1% of family members: 96-100% reported that they considered all the points evaluated as very good/good. 90-95% stated that they would choose this modality again, that they would recommend this modality, and that they preferred it to hospitalization. The HH cost per bed day was 70% higher than the medical clinic cost per bed day.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>HH is feasible to implement and accepted in our setting. Its initial costs were higher than those in the medical clinic, but should be re-evaluated in the long term, if bed capacity and human resources remain constant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina-buenos Aires\",\"volume\":\"85 4\",\"pages\":\"682-690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina-buenos Aires\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-buenos Aires","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家庭住院(HH)是一种家庭护理模式,对卫生系统、患者和家庭都有好处,但在我国很少有经验。在本文中,我们介绍了第一年在公立医院的结果。材料与方法:横断面研究。患者年龄大于17岁,伴有急性和临床稳定的疾病。我们分析了他们的临床特征、住院天数、死亡率、再入院率以及患者和家属满意度调查。成本分析是一般的,每天/张,由于人力资源的逐步合并和可用床位的增加,成本分析是可变的。结果:共有276例患者住院,女性占51%,中位年龄65岁,中位住院天数4,平均Charlson指数4。30天再入院率为17.2%,死亡率为6.7%。28.6%的患者和13.1%的家属完成了满意度调查:96-100%的人认为所有的评分都是非常好/好。90-95%的人表示,他们会再次选择这种方式,他们会推荐这种方式,而且他们更喜欢这种方式,而不是住院治疗。HH单位床位日费用比医疗门诊单位床位日费用高70%。讨论:HH在我们的环境中是可行和可接受的。其初始费用高于诊所的费用,但如果床位容量和人力资源保持不变,应长期重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home hospitalization: first year of experience in a public hospital.

Introduction: Home Hospitalization (HH) is a modality of home care with benefits for the health system, patients, families, and with few experiences in our country. In this paper, we present the results of the first year in a public hospital.

Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study. Patients older than 17 years with acute and clinically stable diseases were included. We analyzed their clinical characteristics, days of hospitalization, mortality, readmission, and patient and family satisfaction surveys. The cost analysis is general, per day/bed, and variable due to the progressive incorporation of human resources and increase of available beds.

Results: A total 276 patients were hospitalized, 51% women, median age 65 years, median number of days of hospitalization 4 and mean Charlson Index 4. The percentage of readmissions was 17.2% and mortality 6.7% at 30 days. Satisfaction surveys were completed by 28.6% of patients and 13.1% of family members: 96-100% reported that they considered all the points evaluated as very good/good. 90-95% stated that they would choose this modality again, that they would recommend this modality, and that they preferred it to hospitalization. The HH cost per bed day was 70% higher than the medical clinic cost per bed day.

Discussion: HH is feasible to implement and accepted in our setting. Its initial costs were higher than those in the medical clinic, but should be re-evaluated in the long term, if bed capacity and human resources remain constant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-buenos Aires
Medicina-buenos Aires 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信