平衡公共卫生与个人自主权:中国疫苗接种政策研究。

IF 3.4 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Jichao Wang, Xiaomei Zhai
{"title":"平衡公共卫生与个人自主权:中国疫苗接种政策研究。","authors":"Jichao Wang, Xiaomei Zhai","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-110762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article examines China's vaccination policy, focusing particularly on childhood immunisation and pandemic vaccines. Although China's laws require individuals to engage in the vaccination decision-making process, the policy does not enforce mandatory vaccination through penalties. Instead, it emphasises informed decision-making, allowing and supporting individuals to choose whether to vaccinate or adopt other preventive measures based on their best health interests. The legal framework includes obligations for guardians to make vaccination decisions for their children, with mechanisms to encourage compliance through checking vaccination status and guiding guardians to vaccination services, rather than punishing vaccine refusal. This approach aligns with the Siracusa Principles, advocating the least restrictive measures necessary to protect public health. The article concludes that China's vaccination policy is best understood as 'mandatory decision-making', a system that balances public health objectives with individual autonomy by making the decision-making process mandatory while keeping the actual vaccination decision voluntary.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing public health and individual autonomy: a study of China's vaccination policy.\",\"authors\":\"Jichao Wang, Xiaomei Zhai\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jme-2025-110762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The article examines China's vaccination policy, focusing particularly on childhood immunisation and pandemic vaccines. Although China's laws require individuals to engage in the vaccination decision-making process, the policy does not enforce mandatory vaccination through penalties. Instead, it emphasises informed decision-making, allowing and supporting individuals to choose whether to vaccinate or adopt other preventive measures based on their best health interests. The legal framework includes obligations for guardians to make vaccination decisions for their children, with mechanisms to encourage compliance through checking vaccination status and guiding guardians to vaccination services, rather than punishing vaccine refusal. This approach aligns with the Siracusa Principles, advocating the least restrictive measures necessary to protect public health. The article concludes that China's vaccination policy is best understood as 'mandatory decision-making', a system that balances public health objectives with individual autonomy by making the decision-making process mandatory while keeping the actual vaccination decision voluntary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2025-110762\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2025-110762","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了中国的疫苗接种政策,特别关注儿童免疫接种和大流行性流感疫苗。尽管中国法律要求个人参与疫苗接种决策过程,但该政策并未通过处罚来强制实施疫苗接种。相反,它强调知情决策,允许和支持个人根据自己的最佳健康利益选择是否接种疫苗或采取其他预防措施。法律框架包括监护人为其子女作出疫苗接种决定的义务,并设有机制,通过检查疫苗接种状况和指导监护人接种疫苗服务来鼓励遵守,而不是惩罚拒绝接种疫苗。这一做法符合锡拉库萨原则,主张采取保护公众健康所需的限制最少的措施。这篇文章的结论是,中国的疫苗接种政策最好被理解为“强制性决策”,这是一种平衡公共卫生目标和个人自主权的制度,使决策过程具有强制性,同时使实际的疫苗接种决策保持自愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing public health and individual autonomy: a study of China's vaccination policy.

The article examines China's vaccination policy, focusing particularly on childhood immunisation and pandemic vaccines. Although China's laws require individuals to engage in the vaccination decision-making process, the policy does not enforce mandatory vaccination through penalties. Instead, it emphasises informed decision-making, allowing and supporting individuals to choose whether to vaccinate or adopt other preventive measures based on their best health interests. The legal framework includes obligations for guardians to make vaccination decisions for their children, with mechanisms to encourage compliance through checking vaccination status and guiding guardians to vaccination services, rather than punishing vaccine refusal. This approach aligns with the Siracusa Principles, advocating the least restrictive measures necessary to protect public health. The article concludes that China's vaccination policy is best understood as 'mandatory decision-making', a system that balances public health objectives with individual autonomy by making the decision-making process mandatory while keeping the actual vaccination decision voluntary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Ethics is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. The journal seeks to promote ethical reflection and conduct in scientific research and medical practice. It features articles on various ethical aspects of health care relevant to health care professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics professionals, researchers and bioscientists, policy makers and patients. Subscribers to the Journal of Medical Ethics also receive Medical Humanities journal at no extra cost. JME is the official journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信