{"title":"家庭结构对初出期成人心理体验的影响:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Anganabha Baruah, Yukti Jain, Stuti Richharia, Ibtisam Nawaz, Bhavya Dhamija","doi":"10.1177/00207640251357093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family structure plays a pivotal role in shaping individuals' psychological development, particularly during emerging adulthood.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In India, where joint and nuclear family systems coexist, understanding how these structures influence psychological variables such as conformity, loneliness, perceived self-efficacy, psychological distancing, and the need for affiliation is critical.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study employed a mixed-methods approach to examine these variables among 470 emerging adults (298 females, 172 males) aged 18 to 25 years, recruited from urban and semi-urban areas in India. Quantitative data were collected using standardized tools, while qualitative insights were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 20 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative results revealed that emerging adults from joint families reported significantly higher levels of self-efficacy compared to those from nuclear families (<i>U</i> = 18,945, <i>p</i> = .03), while no significant differences were found in loneliness (<i>U</i> = 25,140, <i>p</i> = .73) or conformity (<i>U</i> = 20,735, <i>p</i> = .57). A weak negative correlation was found between loneliness and self-efficacy (<i>r</i>s = -.20, <i>p</i> < .05), indicating that higher loneliness is associated with lower self-efficacy. Qualitative findings highlighted the role of family as a source of emotional security, with technology bridging emotional gaps across family types. Participants exhibited a present-focused planning mindset, emphasizing adaptability over rigid long-term goals. Both joint and nuclear family participants relied on familial and peer networks to fulfill affiliative needs, though the nature of these networks varied by family structure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that while joint families were associated with higher self-efficacy, both family types provided emotional security and fulfilled affiliative needs in distinct ways. These findings underscore the importance of considering both structural and relational aspects of family dynamics in understanding young adults' psychological well-being. Future research should explore these dynamics across different cultural contexts and age groups to identify universal and culture-specific patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640251357093"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of family structure in shaping psychological experiences of emerging adults: A mixed methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Anganabha Baruah, Yukti Jain, Stuti Richharia, Ibtisam Nawaz, Bhavya Dhamija\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207640251357093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family structure plays a pivotal role in shaping individuals' psychological development, particularly during emerging adulthood.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In India, where joint and nuclear family systems coexist, understanding how these structures influence psychological variables such as conformity, loneliness, perceived self-efficacy, psychological distancing, and the need for affiliation is critical.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study employed a mixed-methods approach to examine these variables among 470 emerging adults (298 females, 172 males) aged 18 to 25 years, recruited from urban and semi-urban areas in India. Quantitative data were collected using standardized tools, while qualitative insights were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 20 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative results revealed that emerging adults from joint families reported significantly higher levels of self-efficacy compared to those from nuclear families (<i>U</i> = 18,945, <i>p</i> = .03), while no significant differences were found in loneliness (<i>U</i> = 25,140, <i>p</i> = .73) or conformity (<i>U</i> = 20,735, <i>p</i> = .57). A weak negative correlation was found between loneliness and self-efficacy (<i>r</i>s = -.20, <i>p</i> < .05), indicating that higher loneliness is associated with lower self-efficacy. Qualitative findings highlighted the role of family as a source of emotional security, with technology bridging emotional gaps across family types. Participants exhibited a present-focused planning mindset, emphasizing adaptability over rigid long-term goals. Both joint and nuclear family participants relied on familial and peer networks to fulfill affiliative needs, though the nature of these networks varied by family structure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that while joint families were associated with higher self-efficacy, both family types provided emotional security and fulfilled affiliative needs in distinct ways. These findings underscore the importance of considering both structural and relational aspects of family dynamics in understanding young adults' psychological well-being. Future research should explore these dynamics across different cultural contexts and age groups to identify universal and culture-specific patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"207640251357093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251357093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251357093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:家庭结构在塑造个体的心理发展中起着关键作用,特别是在成年初期。目的:在联合家庭和核心家庭并存的印度,了解这些结构如何影响心理变量,如从从性、孤独感、自我效能感、心理距离和归属感需求,是至关重要的。方法:本研究采用混合方法对来自印度城市和半城市地区的470名18至25岁的新兴成年人(298名女性,172名男性)进行了这些变量的检验。定量数据是使用标准化工具收集的,而定性的见解是通过与20名参与者的半结构化访谈收集的。结果:定量结果显示,来自联合家庭的新生成人的自我效能水平显著高于来自核心家庭的新生成人(U = 18,945, p = .03),而在孤独感(U = 25,140, p = .73)和从从性(U = 20,735, p = .57)方面没有发现显著差异。孤独感与自我效能感呈弱负相关(rs = -)。结论:研究得出结论,虽然联合家庭与更高的自我效能相关,但两种家庭类型都以不同的方式提供情感安全感和满足附属需求。这些发现强调了在理解年轻人的心理健康时考虑家庭动态的结构和关系方面的重要性。未来的研究应探索这些动态跨越不同的文化背景和年龄组,以确定普遍和特定的文化模式。
The role of family structure in shaping psychological experiences of emerging adults: A mixed methods study.
Background: Family structure plays a pivotal role in shaping individuals' psychological development, particularly during emerging adulthood.
Aim: In India, where joint and nuclear family systems coexist, understanding how these structures influence psychological variables such as conformity, loneliness, perceived self-efficacy, psychological distancing, and the need for affiliation is critical.
Method: This study employed a mixed-methods approach to examine these variables among 470 emerging adults (298 females, 172 males) aged 18 to 25 years, recruited from urban and semi-urban areas in India. Quantitative data were collected using standardized tools, while qualitative insights were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 20 participants.
Results: Quantitative results revealed that emerging adults from joint families reported significantly higher levels of self-efficacy compared to those from nuclear families (U = 18,945, p = .03), while no significant differences were found in loneliness (U = 25,140, p = .73) or conformity (U = 20,735, p = .57). A weak negative correlation was found between loneliness and self-efficacy (rs = -.20, p < .05), indicating that higher loneliness is associated with lower self-efficacy. Qualitative findings highlighted the role of family as a source of emotional security, with technology bridging emotional gaps across family types. Participants exhibited a present-focused planning mindset, emphasizing adaptability over rigid long-term goals. Both joint and nuclear family participants relied on familial and peer networks to fulfill affiliative needs, though the nature of these networks varied by family structure.
Conclusion: The study concludes that while joint families were associated with higher self-efficacy, both family types provided emotional security and fulfilled affiliative needs in distinct ways. These findings underscore the importance of considering both structural and relational aspects of family dynamics in understanding young adults' psychological well-being. Future research should explore these dynamics across different cultural contexts and age groups to identify universal and culture-specific patterns.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities.
Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas.
The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.