腹腔镜髂耻道修补术与经腹腹膜前疝成形术治疗对侧腹股沟隐疝的比较。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2025-08-12 DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03426-4
Sung Ryul Lee, Geon Young Byun
{"title":"腹腔镜髂耻道修补术与经腹腹膜前疝成形术治疗对侧腹股沟隐疝的比较。","authors":"Sung Ryul Lee, Geon Young Byun","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03426-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH) following unilateral inguinal hernia repair is a common cause of reoperation. Contralateral occult inguinal hernia (OIH) may cause MCIH. Transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP) might be overtreatment for OIH repair; laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair (IPTR) may be an effective alternative but has not been robustly studied. We compared laparoscopic IPTR and TAPP in treating OIH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study included 701 patients aged ≥ 18 years who received treatment for inguinal hernia between September 2012 and December 2023; 90 patients were excluded owing to loss during follow-up. Patients were divided into TAPP (54 patients; mesh implantation) and laparoscopic IPTR (647 patients; suture of the iliopubic tract and transversalis fascia arch without mesh implantation) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MCIH from repaired OIH occurred in one patient in the TAPP group and six patients in the IPTR group [1.9% (1/54) vs. 0.9% (6/647), respectively]; this difference was not significant. The postoperative complication rate was higher in the TAPP group than in the IPTR group [5.6% (3/54) vs. 0.8% (5/647), p < 0.001]. Inguinodynia occurred in one patient in each group. Postoperative pain scores, duration of hospitalization, and time to return to normal daily life did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic IPTR is safe and effective for treating OIH and presents a viable alternative to TAPP.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair and transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty for contralateral occult inguinal hernia.\",\"authors\":\"Sung Ryul Lee, Geon Young Byun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10029-025-03426-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH) following unilateral inguinal hernia repair is a common cause of reoperation. Contralateral occult inguinal hernia (OIH) may cause MCIH. Transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP) might be overtreatment for OIH repair; laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair (IPTR) may be an effective alternative but has not been robustly studied. We compared laparoscopic IPTR and TAPP in treating OIH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study included 701 patients aged ≥ 18 years who received treatment for inguinal hernia between September 2012 and December 2023; 90 patients were excluded owing to loss during follow-up. Patients were divided into TAPP (54 patients; mesh implantation) and laparoscopic IPTR (647 patients; suture of the iliopubic tract and transversalis fascia arch without mesh implantation) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MCIH from repaired OIH occurred in one patient in the TAPP group and six patients in the IPTR group [1.9% (1/54) vs. 0.9% (6/647), respectively]; this difference was not significant. The postoperative complication rate was higher in the TAPP group than in the IPTR group [5.6% (3/54) vs. 0.8% (5/647), p < 0.001]. Inguinodynia occurred in one patient in each group. Postoperative pain scores, duration of hospitalization, and time to return to normal daily life did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic IPTR is safe and effective for treating OIH and presents a viable alternative to TAPP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hernia\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hernia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03426-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03426-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:异时性对侧腹股沟疝(MCIH)是单侧腹股沟疝修补术后再手术的常见原因。对侧隐性腹股沟疝(OIH)可引起MCIH。经腹腹膜前疝成形术(TAPP)可能是OIH修复的过度治疗;腹腔镜髂耻道修复(IPTR)可能是一种有效的替代方法,但尚未得到充分的研究。比较腹腔镜下IPTR和TAPP治疗OIH的效果。方法:本回顾性观察队列研究纳入2012年9月至2023年12月期间接受腹股沟疝治疗的701例年龄≥18岁的患者;90例患者因随访丢失而被排除。患者分为TAPP组(54例);补片植入)和腹腔镜IPTR(647例;髂耻骨束和横筋膜弓不植入补片组的缝合。结果:TAPP组和IPTR组分别有1例和6例患者因修复后的OIH发生MCIH[分别为1.9%(1/54)和0.9% (6/647)];这一差异并不显著。TAPP组术后并发症发生率高于IPTR组[5.6%(3/54)比0.8% (5/647)],p结论:腹腔镜IPTR治疗OIH安全有效,是TAPP的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair and transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty for contralateral occult inguinal hernia.

Purpose: Metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH) following unilateral inguinal hernia repair is a common cause of reoperation. Contralateral occult inguinal hernia (OIH) may cause MCIH. Transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP) might be overtreatment for OIH repair; laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair (IPTR) may be an effective alternative but has not been robustly studied. We compared laparoscopic IPTR and TAPP in treating OIH.

Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included 701 patients aged ≥ 18 years who received treatment for inguinal hernia between September 2012 and December 2023; 90 patients were excluded owing to loss during follow-up. Patients were divided into TAPP (54 patients; mesh implantation) and laparoscopic IPTR (647 patients; suture of the iliopubic tract and transversalis fascia arch without mesh implantation) groups.

Results: MCIH from repaired OIH occurred in one patient in the TAPP group and six patients in the IPTR group [1.9% (1/54) vs. 0.9% (6/647), respectively]; this difference was not significant. The postoperative complication rate was higher in the TAPP group than in the IPTR group [5.6% (3/54) vs. 0.8% (5/647), p < 0.001]. Inguinodynia occurred in one patient in each group. Postoperative pain scores, duration of hospitalization, and time to return to normal daily life did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic IPTR is safe and effective for treating OIH and presents a viable alternative to TAPP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信