双吻合器或小挤压支架置入术治疗真冠状动脉分叉病变:多中心COLLECT-BIF登记。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Aybüke Şimşek, Hande Uysal, Ahmet Güner, Mehmet Baran Karataş, Elnur Alizade, Ali Nazmi Çalik, İrfan Şahin, İbrahim Faruk Aktürk, Serkan Kahraman, Ömer Taşbulak, Ezgi Gültekin Güner, Ebru Serin, Veysel Ozan Tanik, Abdullah Doğan, Kaan Gökçe, Enes Arslan, Hamdi Püşüroğlu, Muhammed Furkan Deniz, Cemalettin Akman, Murat Gökalp, İlyas Çetin, Berkay Serter, Koray Çiloğlu, Mehmet Kocaağa, Kudret Keskin, Saner Bahadir Gök, Fatih Furkan Bedir, Eyüp Karaer, Ahmet Arif Yalçin, Fatih Uzun
{"title":"双吻合器或小挤压支架置入术治疗真冠状动脉分叉病变:多中心COLLECT-BIF登记。","authors":"Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Aybüke Şimşek, Hande Uysal, Ahmet Güner, Mehmet Baran Karataş, Elnur Alizade, Ali Nazmi Çalik, İrfan Şahin, İbrahim Faruk Aktürk, Serkan Kahraman, Ömer Taşbulak, Ezgi Gültekin Güner, Ebru Serin, Veysel Ozan Tanik, Abdullah Doğan, Kaan Gökçe, Enes Arslan, Hamdi Püşüroğlu, Muhammed Furkan Deniz, Cemalettin Akman, Murat Gökalp, İlyas Çetin, Berkay Serter, Koray Çiloğlu, Mehmet Kocaağa, Kudret Keskin, Saner Bahadir Gök, Fatih Furkan Bedir, Eyüp Karaer, Ahmet Arif Yalçin, Fatih Uzun","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This multicenter observational study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes of the mini-crush technique (MCT) and double kissing culotte technique (DKCT) in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This large-scale, multicenter study (n = 8) included patients with CBLs who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with either MCT or DKCT. The primary endpoint was defined as major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which include cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 728 patients [male: 584 (80.2%), mean age: 60.93 ± 10.46 years] were included. The initial revascularization strategy was MCT in 476 (65.4%) cases and DKCT in 252 (34.6%) cases. The number of balloons used (6.30 ± 1.84 vs. 5.43 ± 1.99, P < 0.001) and procedure time (65.10 ± 20.34 vs. 61.30 ± 18.48 min, P = 0.020) were significantly higher in the DKCT group. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, risk-adjusted mid-term MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.645, (95% confidence interval: 0.395-1.053), P = 0.079] did not differ in the MCT group compared to the DKCT group. Additionally, chronic kidney disease (HR = 2.434, P < 0.001), high SYNTAX score (HR = 1.085, P < 0.001), final kissing balloon inflation (HR = 0.110, P < 0.001), presence of nonfatal intraprocedural complications (HR = 5.818, P < 0.001), and high total cholesterol level (HR = 1.007, P = 0.005) were found to be independent predictors of MACE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This multicenter registry demonstrates that in patients with CBLs, the risk-adjusted MACE rate was similar between both techniques, with a nonsignificant trend favoring MCT at mid-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double kissing culotte or mini-crush stenting for true coronary bifurcation lesions: the multicenter COLLECT-BIF registry.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Aybüke Şimşek, Hande Uysal, Ahmet Güner, Mehmet Baran Karataş, Elnur Alizade, Ali Nazmi Çalik, İrfan Şahin, İbrahim Faruk Aktürk, Serkan Kahraman, Ömer Taşbulak, Ezgi Gültekin Güner, Ebru Serin, Veysel Ozan Tanik, Abdullah Doğan, Kaan Gökçe, Enes Arslan, Hamdi Püşüroğlu, Muhammed Furkan Deniz, Cemalettin Akman, Murat Gökalp, İlyas Çetin, Berkay Serter, Koray Çiloğlu, Mehmet Kocaağa, Kudret Keskin, Saner Bahadir Gök, Fatih Furkan Bedir, Eyüp Karaer, Ahmet Arif Yalçin, Fatih Uzun\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This multicenter observational study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes of the mini-crush technique (MCT) and double kissing culotte technique (DKCT) in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This large-scale, multicenter study (n = 8) included patients with CBLs who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with either MCT or DKCT. The primary endpoint was defined as major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which include cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 728 patients [male: 584 (80.2%), mean age: 60.93 ± 10.46 years] were included. The initial revascularization strategy was MCT in 476 (65.4%) cases and DKCT in 252 (34.6%) cases. The number of balloons used (6.30 ± 1.84 vs. 5.43 ± 1.99, P < 0.001) and procedure time (65.10 ± 20.34 vs. 61.30 ± 18.48 min, P = 0.020) were significantly higher in the DKCT group. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, risk-adjusted mid-term MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.645, (95% confidence interval: 0.395-1.053), P = 0.079] did not differ in the MCT group compared to the DKCT group. Additionally, chronic kidney disease (HR = 2.434, P < 0.001), high SYNTAX score (HR = 1.085, P < 0.001), final kissing balloon inflation (HR = 0.110, P < 0.001), presence of nonfatal intraprocedural complications (HR = 5.818, P < 0.001), and high total cholesterol level (HR = 1.007, P = 0.005) were found to be independent predictors of MACE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This multicenter registry demonstrates that in patients with CBLs, the risk-adjusted MACE rate was similar between both techniques, with a nonsignificant trend favoring MCT at mid-term follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001560\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本多中心观察性研究旨在回顾性评价微型挤压技术(MCT)和双吻合器技术(DKCT)治疗冠状动脉分叉病变(CBLs)患者的中期临床结果。方法:这项大规模、多中心的研究(n = 8)纳入了接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(MCT或DKCT)的CBLs患者。主要终点定义为主要心脏不良事件(MACE),包括心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或临床驱动的靶病变血运重建术。结果:共纳入728例患者,其中男性584例(80.2%),平均年龄60.93±10.46岁。初始血运重建策略为MCT 476例(65.4%),DKCT 252例(34.6%)。结论:该多中心注册显示,在CBLs患者中,两种技术的风险调整后的MACE率相似,中期随访时MCT的趋势不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Double kissing culotte or mini-crush stenting for true coronary bifurcation lesions: the multicenter COLLECT-BIF registry.

Background: This multicenter observational study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes of the mini-crush technique (MCT) and double kissing culotte technique (DKCT) in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs).

Methods: This large-scale, multicenter study (n = 8) included patients with CBLs who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with either MCT or DKCT. The primary endpoint was defined as major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which include cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization.

Results: A total of 728 patients [male: 584 (80.2%), mean age: 60.93 ± 10.46 years] were included. The initial revascularization strategy was MCT in 476 (65.4%) cases and DKCT in 252 (34.6%) cases. The number of balloons used (6.30 ± 1.84 vs. 5.43 ± 1.99, P < 0.001) and procedure time (65.10 ± 20.34 vs. 61.30 ± 18.48 min, P = 0.020) were significantly higher in the DKCT group. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, risk-adjusted mid-term MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.645, (95% confidence interval: 0.395-1.053), P = 0.079] did not differ in the MCT group compared to the DKCT group. Additionally, chronic kidney disease (HR = 2.434, P < 0.001), high SYNTAX score (HR = 1.085, P < 0.001), final kissing balloon inflation (HR = 0.110, P < 0.001), presence of nonfatal intraprocedural complications (HR = 5.818, P < 0.001), and high total cholesterol level (HR = 1.007, P = 0.005) were found to be independent predictors of MACE.

Conclusion: This multicenter registry demonstrates that in patients with CBLs, the risk-adjusted MACE rate was similar between both techniques, with a nonsignificant trend favoring MCT at mid-term follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management. Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and​ peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信