Sarah L Berger, Rinyaporn Phengchat, Stanley W Botchway, Mohammed Yusuf
{"title":"优化染色体产量:收获、制备和废物回收方法的比较分析。","authors":"Sarah L Berger, Rinyaporn Phengchat, Stanley W Botchway, Mohammed Yusuf","doi":"10.1080/07366205.2025.2536438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In mitotic chromosome preparation, it is crucial to maximize chromosome yield for downstream cytogenetic analysis. Using HeLa cells as a model adherent cell, we assessed and compared the recovery of chromosomes from the entire process as well as the fraction of chromosomes that would generally become discarded in the standardly used trypsinization and mitotic-shake-off chromosome preparation methods. A higher chromosome yield for polyamine (PA) and methanol acetic acid (MAA) chromosomes was achieved using the mitotic-shake-off method compared to trypsinization. Moreover, mitotic arrest using colcemid or nocodazole gave similar PA and MAA chromosome yields in the commonly collected fractions. Interestingly, when comparing the fractions that would usually be discarded in the mitotic-shake-off, for colcemid-treated cells compared to nocodazole-treated cells, a greater number of PA chromosomes was recovered from the former. Our results show that chromosomes can be retrieved from the waste media. These recovered chromosomes display a suitable morphology in all chromosome preparations, suggesting that in conditions where high chromosome yields are required, utilizing the mitotic-shake-off method and recovering the generally discarded chromosome fraction together with the commonly used fraction would aid in maximizing chromosome yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":8945,"journal":{"name":"BioTechniques","volume":" ","pages":"245-256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing chromosome yield: a comparative analysis of harvesting, preparation and waste recovery methods.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah L Berger, Rinyaporn Phengchat, Stanley W Botchway, Mohammed Yusuf\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07366205.2025.2536438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In mitotic chromosome preparation, it is crucial to maximize chromosome yield for downstream cytogenetic analysis. Using HeLa cells as a model adherent cell, we assessed and compared the recovery of chromosomes from the entire process as well as the fraction of chromosomes that would generally become discarded in the standardly used trypsinization and mitotic-shake-off chromosome preparation methods. A higher chromosome yield for polyamine (PA) and methanol acetic acid (MAA) chromosomes was achieved using the mitotic-shake-off method compared to trypsinization. Moreover, mitotic arrest using colcemid or nocodazole gave similar PA and MAA chromosome yields in the commonly collected fractions. Interestingly, when comparing the fractions that would usually be discarded in the mitotic-shake-off, for colcemid-treated cells compared to nocodazole-treated cells, a greater number of PA chromosomes was recovered from the former. Our results show that chromosomes can be retrieved from the waste media. These recovered chromosomes display a suitable morphology in all chromosome preparations, suggesting that in conditions where high chromosome yields are required, utilizing the mitotic-shake-off method and recovering the generally discarded chromosome fraction together with the commonly used fraction would aid in maximizing chromosome yield.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioTechniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"245-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioTechniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07366205.2025.2536438\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioTechniques","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07366205.2025.2536438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing chromosome yield: a comparative analysis of harvesting, preparation and waste recovery methods.
In mitotic chromosome preparation, it is crucial to maximize chromosome yield for downstream cytogenetic analysis. Using HeLa cells as a model adherent cell, we assessed and compared the recovery of chromosomes from the entire process as well as the fraction of chromosomes that would generally become discarded in the standardly used trypsinization and mitotic-shake-off chromosome preparation methods. A higher chromosome yield for polyamine (PA) and methanol acetic acid (MAA) chromosomes was achieved using the mitotic-shake-off method compared to trypsinization. Moreover, mitotic arrest using colcemid or nocodazole gave similar PA and MAA chromosome yields in the commonly collected fractions. Interestingly, when comparing the fractions that would usually be discarded in the mitotic-shake-off, for colcemid-treated cells compared to nocodazole-treated cells, a greater number of PA chromosomes was recovered from the former. Our results show that chromosomes can be retrieved from the waste media. These recovered chromosomes display a suitable morphology in all chromosome preparations, suggesting that in conditions where high chromosome yields are required, utilizing the mitotic-shake-off method and recovering the generally discarded chromosome fraction together with the commonly used fraction would aid in maximizing chromosome yield.
期刊介绍:
BioTechniques is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original laboratory methods, related technical and software tools, and methods-oriented review articles that are of broad interest to professional life scientists, as well as to scientists from other disciplines (e.g., chemistry, physics, computer science, plant and agricultural science and climate science) interested in life science applications for their technologies.
Since 1983, BioTechniques has been a leading peer-reviewed journal for methods-related research. The journal considers:
Reports describing innovative new methods, platforms and software, substantive modifications to existing methods, or innovative applications of existing methods, techniques & tools to new models or scientific questions
Descriptions of technical tools that facilitate the design or performance of experiments or data analysis, such as software and simple laboratory devices
Surveys of technical approaches related to broad fields of research
Reviews discussing advancements in techniques and methods related to broad fields of research
Letters to the Editor and Expert Opinions highlighting interesting observations or cautionary tales concerning experimental design, methodology or analysis.