{"title":"助记相似性任务中诱饵可辨析性的认知建模。","authors":"Tianye Ma, Weiwei Zhang","doi":"10.3758/s13428-025-02785-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lure discrimination in the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) has been widely used to measure pattern separation. However, the classic index of lure discrimination in the MST has arbitrary assumptions with limited supporting evidence. The present study has thus developed several models with different assumptions on the process underlying MST as well as the different model-derived indices of lure discrimination. Furthermore, we have assessed and compared these models in a measurement-based approach. We found that the model for the classic lure discrimination index fails to accurately predict the responses in an MST from > 150 participants. Instead, a new index based on the unidimensional signal detection model provides the best fits of the empirical dataset. This work highlights the value of model-based approaches in measuring lure discriminability in the MST.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 9","pages":"253"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive modeling of lure discriminability in the Mnemonic Similarity Task.\",\"authors\":\"Tianye Ma, Weiwei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13428-025-02785-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lure discrimination in the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) has been widely used to measure pattern separation. However, the classic index of lure discrimination in the MST has arbitrary assumptions with limited supporting evidence. The present study has thus developed several models with different assumptions on the process underlying MST as well as the different model-derived indices of lure discrimination. Furthermore, we have assessed and compared these models in a measurement-based approach. We found that the model for the classic lure discrimination index fails to accurately predict the responses in an MST from > 150 participants. Instead, a new index based on the unidimensional signal detection model provides the best fits of the empirical dataset. This work highlights the value of model-based approaches in measuring lure discriminability in the MST.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"volume\":\"57 9\",\"pages\":\"253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02785-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02785-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cognitive modeling of lure discriminability in the Mnemonic Similarity Task.
Lure discrimination in the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) has been widely used to measure pattern separation. However, the classic index of lure discrimination in the MST has arbitrary assumptions with limited supporting evidence. The present study has thus developed several models with different assumptions on the process underlying MST as well as the different model-derived indices of lure discrimination. Furthermore, we have assessed and compared these models in a measurement-based approach. We found that the model for the classic lure discrimination index fails to accurately predict the responses in an MST from > 150 participants. Instead, a new index based on the unidimensional signal detection model provides the best fits of the empirical dataset. This work highlights the value of model-based approaches in measuring lure discriminability in the MST.
期刊介绍:
Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.