健康个体视网膜血管闪烁反应的可重复性。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Angelos Kalitzeos, Robert J Summers, Rebekka Heitmar
{"title":"健康个体视网膜血管闪烁反应的可重复性。","authors":"Angelos Kalitzeos, Robert J Summers, Rebekka Heitmar","doi":"10.1111/aos.17578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the repeatability of retinal blood vessel parameters (from proprietary software and the raw vessel data) measured in vivo in healthy individuals at rest, during and post flicker light (FL) provocation using a standardised protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recorded the diameters of one retinal artery and one vein in each of 33 healthy adult volunteers at rest, during and post FL provocation on two occasions using the Retinal Vessel Analyser (RVA). Repeat visits were scheduled at three different timepoints: (1) within 30 mins on the same day, (2) within a fortnight and (3) within a month (n = 11, each). All participants underwent intraocular and systemic blood pressure assessment to ensure these were comparable between visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Retinal vessel parameters at rest, during and post FL provocation were comparable between all pairs of visits for all three groups. Repeatability between visits was assessed using Bland-Altman Analyses and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs). Maximum dilation for arteries and veins and maximum constriction for arteries due to FL provocation computed from raw dilation data showed better repeatability than that generated by the RVA software. Time to reach maximum dilation in arteries and veins and maximum constriction in arteries was on average comparable but least repeatable between visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Retinal vessel parameters computed from the raw RVA data may be superior in quality to the output from the proprietary software because the latter uses fixed narrow time-windows to determine the parameters. Variance within healthy controls, pathology groups and repeatability parameters alongside systemic haemodynamic parameters should be considered when utilising dynamic retinal vascular parameters as study endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeatability of retinal vessel flicker responses in healthy individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Angelos Kalitzeos, Robert J Summers, Rebekka Heitmar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aos.17578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the repeatability of retinal blood vessel parameters (from proprietary software and the raw vessel data) measured in vivo in healthy individuals at rest, during and post flicker light (FL) provocation using a standardised protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recorded the diameters of one retinal artery and one vein in each of 33 healthy adult volunteers at rest, during and post FL provocation on two occasions using the Retinal Vessel Analyser (RVA). Repeat visits were scheduled at three different timepoints: (1) within 30 mins on the same day, (2) within a fortnight and (3) within a month (n = 11, each). All participants underwent intraocular and systemic blood pressure assessment to ensure these were comparable between visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Retinal vessel parameters at rest, during and post FL provocation were comparable between all pairs of visits for all three groups. Repeatability between visits was assessed using Bland-Altman Analyses and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs). Maximum dilation for arteries and veins and maximum constriction for arteries due to FL provocation computed from raw dilation data showed better repeatability than that generated by the RVA software. Time to reach maximum dilation in arteries and veins and maximum constriction in arteries was on average comparable but least repeatable between visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Retinal vessel parameters computed from the raw RVA data may be superior in quality to the output from the proprietary software because the latter uses fixed narrow time-windows to determine the parameters. Variance within healthy controls, pathology groups and repeatability parameters alongside systemic haemodynamic parameters should be considered when utilising dynamic retinal vascular parameters as study endpoints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.17578\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.17578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用标准化方案,确定健康个体在休息、闪烁光(FL)激发期间和之后体内测量的视网膜血管参数(来自专有软件和原始血管数据)的可重复性。方法:我们使用视网膜血管分析仪(RVA)记录了33名健康成年志愿者在休息时、FL刺激期间和刺激后的视网膜动脉和静脉直径。在三个不同的时间点安排重复访问:(1)在同一天30分钟内,(2)在两周内,(3)在一个月内(每个n = 11)。所有参与者都进行了眼内和全身血压评估,以确保两次就诊之间具有可比性。结果:在休息时,在FL激发期间和之后,视网膜血管参数在所有三组的所有对访问之间具有可比性。使用Bland-Altman分析和类内相关系数(ICCs)评估两次访问之间的可重复性。根据原始扩张数据计算的动脉和静脉的最大扩张和动脉因FL激发而产生的最大收缩比RVA软件产生的结果具有更好的重复性。达到动脉和静脉最大扩张和动脉最大收缩的时间平均相当,但两次就诊之间重复性最低。结论:从原始RVA数据计算的视网膜血管参数可能比专有软件输出的质量更好,因为后者使用固定的窄时间窗来确定参数。当使用动态视网膜血管参数作为研究终点时,应考虑健康对照组、病理组和可重复性参数与全身血流动力学参数之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repeatability of retinal vessel flicker responses in healthy individuals.

Purpose: To determine the repeatability of retinal blood vessel parameters (from proprietary software and the raw vessel data) measured in vivo in healthy individuals at rest, during and post flicker light (FL) provocation using a standardised protocol.

Methods: We recorded the diameters of one retinal artery and one vein in each of 33 healthy adult volunteers at rest, during and post FL provocation on two occasions using the Retinal Vessel Analyser (RVA). Repeat visits were scheduled at three different timepoints: (1) within 30 mins on the same day, (2) within a fortnight and (3) within a month (n = 11, each). All participants underwent intraocular and systemic blood pressure assessment to ensure these were comparable between visits.

Results: Retinal vessel parameters at rest, during and post FL provocation were comparable between all pairs of visits for all three groups. Repeatability between visits was assessed using Bland-Altman Analyses and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs). Maximum dilation for arteries and veins and maximum constriction for arteries due to FL provocation computed from raw dilation data showed better repeatability than that generated by the RVA software. Time to reach maximum dilation in arteries and veins and maximum constriction in arteries was on average comparable but least repeatable between visits.

Conclusions: Retinal vessel parameters computed from the raw RVA data may be superior in quality to the output from the proprietary software because the latter uses fixed narrow time-windows to determine the parameters. Variance within healthy controls, pathology groups and repeatability parameters alongside systemic haemodynamic parameters should be considered when utilising dynamic retinal vascular parameters as study endpoints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信