将辩证行为疗法纳入青少年抑郁症的治疗:回顾性研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Caiqin Xi, Xiaomei Jiang, Yanyan He, Yinping Liu, Huahua An, Keyi Shang, Xiaojing Ma, Dong Ren
{"title":"将辩证行为疗法纳入青少年抑郁症的治疗:回顾性研究。","authors":"Caiqin Xi, Xiaomei Jiang, Yanyan He, Yinping Liu, Huahua An, Keyi Shang, Xiaojing Ma, Dong Ren","doi":"10.62641/aep.v53i4.1963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, the prevalence of depression among adolescents is on the rise, posing serious societal problems. Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as sertraline, are two commonly employed therapeutic approaches that have shown good clinical outcomes. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic effects of DBT with or without sertraline on adolescent depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis reviewed 88 cases of adolescent depression treated at our hospital and compared them with 60 healthy adolescents. The patients with depression were divided into three groups: sertraline alone, DBT alone, and combined DBT and sertraline (DBT+sertraline) treatment. In the Sertraline-only and DBT+sertraline groups, sertraline was administered orally for a continuous period of 24 weeks. In the DBT-only and the DBT+sertraline groups, DBT treatment lasted for 13 weeks, followed by an observation period of another 11 weeks. DBT treatment efficacy was evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) at baseline and after 5, 9, 13 and 24 weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that all three treatment modalities significantly reduced HAMD scores (p < 0.001, η = 0.749). The combined treatment group achieved the fastest reduction in HAMD score at the initial treatment stage. Whilst the Sertraline group showed a pronounced reduction by Week 13, it later exhibited a rebound in scores at 24 weeks, unlike the DBT-containing groups. In terms of emotional regulation strategies, CERQ scores indicated that DBT+sertraline significantly increased positive emotional regulation strategy scores, followed by DBT alone (DBT+sertraline vs DBT, p < 0.001), whilst the sertraline-alone group had the smallest increase (DBT+sertraline vs sertraline, p < 0.001) This pattern was particularly pronounced in the Positive Reappraisal subscale. Negative emotional regulation strategy scores were significantly reduced across all treatment groups, especially for the Self-blame item, with the largest reduction observed in the DBT+sertraline group, followed by the DBT alone (DBT+sertraline vs DBT, no significance) and sertraline-alone (DBT+sertraline vs sertraline, p < 0.001) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study's findings demonstrate that DBT and sertraline can improve emotional regulation abilities and effectively alleviate symptoms of depression in adolescents. In particular, superior outcomes were observed in the combined treatment group compared to the individual treatment groups. These findings aim to provide guidance and reference for clinicians, mental health professionals, policymakers and families of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7251,"journal":{"name":"Actas espanolas de psiquiatria","volume":"53 4","pages":"701-714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Into the Treatment of Adolescent Depression: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Caiqin Xi, Xiaomei Jiang, Yanyan He, Yinping Liu, Huahua An, Keyi Shang, Xiaojing Ma, Dong Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.62641/aep.v53i4.1963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, the prevalence of depression among adolescents is on the rise, posing serious societal problems. Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as sertraline, are two commonly employed therapeutic approaches that have shown good clinical outcomes. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic effects of DBT with or without sertraline on adolescent depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis reviewed 88 cases of adolescent depression treated at our hospital and compared them with 60 healthy adolescents. The patients with depression were divided into three groups: sertraline alone, DBT alone, and combined DBT and sertraline (DBT+sertraline) treatment. In the Sertraline-only and DBT+sertraline groups, sertraline was administered orally for a continuous period of 24 weeks. In the DBT-only and the DBT+sertraline groups, DBT treatment lasted for 13 weeks, followed by an observation period of another 11 weeks. DBT treatment efficacy was evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) at baseline and after 5, 9, 13 and 24 weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that all three treatment modalities significantly reduced HAMD scores (p < 0.001, η = 0.749). The combined treatment group achieved the fastest reduction in HAMD score at the initial treatment stage. Whilst the Sertraline group showed a pronounced reduction by Week 13, it later exhibited a rebound in scores at 24 weeks, unlike the DBT-containing groups. In terms of emotional regulation strategies, CERQ scores indicated that DBT+sertraline significantly increased positive emotional regulation strategy scores, followed by DBT alone (DBT+sertraline vs DBT, p < 0.001), whilst the sertraline-alone group had the smallest increase (DBT+sertraline vs sertraline, p < 0.001) This pattern was particularly pronounced in the Positive Reappraisal subscale. Negative emotional regulation strategy scores were significantly reduced across all treatment groups, especially for the Self-blame item, with the largest reduction observed in the DBT+sertraline group, followed by the DBT alone (DBT+sertraline vs DBT, no significance) and sertraline-alone (DBT+sertraline vs sertraline, p < 0.001) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study's findings demonstrate that DBT and sertraline can improve emotional regulation abilities and effectively alleviate symptoms of depression in adolescents. In particular, superior outcomes were observed in the combined treatment group compared to the individual treatment groups. These findings aim to provide guidance and reference for clinicians, mental health professionals, policymakers and families of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actas espanolas de psiquiatria\",\"volume\":\"53 4\",\"pages\":\"701-714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353241/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actas espanolas de psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62641/aep.v53i4.1963\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas espanolas de psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62641/aep.v53i4.1963","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在全球范围内,青少年抑郁症的患病率呈上升趋势,造成了严重的社会问题。辩证行为疗法(DBT)和选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs),如舍曲林,是两种常用的治疗方法,已显示出良好的临床效果。本研究旨在探讨舍曲林加用或不加用DBT治疗青少年抑郁症的效果。方法:回顾性分析我院收治的88例青少年抑郁症患者,并与60例健康青少年进行比较。将抑郁症患者分为单独使用舍曲林、单独使用DBT、DBT联合使用舍曲林(DBT+舍曲林)三组。单用舍曲林组和DBT+舍曲林组,连续口服舍曲林24周。单DBT组和DBT+舍曲林组,DBT治疗13周,观察期11周。采用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD)和认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ)在基线和治疗5、9、13和24周后评估DBT治疗效果。结果:三种治疗方式均显著降低了HAMD评分(p < 0.001, η = 0.749)。联合治疗组在治疗初期HAMD评分下降最快。虽然舍曲林组在第13周时表现出明显的下降,但与含有dbt的组不同,它后来在24周时表现出得分反弹。在情绪调节策略方面,CERQ评分显示DBT+舍曲林显著增加积极情绪调节策略得分,其次是DBT单独组(DBT+舍曲林vs DBT, p < 0.001),而舍曲林单独组的增加最小(DBT+舍曲林vs舍曲林,p < 0.001),这种模式在积极重评量表中尤为明显。负性情绪调节策略得分在所有治疗组中均显著降低,尤其是自责项,其中DBT+舍曲林组下降幅度最大,其次是DBT单独组(DBT+舍曲林vs DBT,无统计学意义)和舍曲林单独组(DBT+舍曲林vs舍曲林,p < 0.001)。结论:本研究结果表明,DBT和舍曲林可提高青少年情绪调节能力,有效缓解抑郁症状。特别是,与单独治疗组相比,联合治疗组观察到更好的结果。这些发现旨在为临床医生、心理卫生专业人员、政策制定者和患者家属提供指导和参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Into the Treatment of Adolescent Depression: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Globally, the prevalence of depression among adolescents is on the rise, posing serious societal problems. Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as sertraline, are two commonly employed therapeutic approaches that have shown good clinical outcomes. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic effects of DBT with or without sertraline on adolescent depression.

Methods: This retrospective analysis reviewed 88 cases of adolescent depression treated at our hospital and compared them with 60 healthy adolescents. The patients with depression were divided into three groups: sertraline alone, DBT alone, and combined DBT and sertraline (DBT+sertraline) treatment. In the Sertraline-only and DBT+sertraline groups, sertraline was administered orally for a continuous period of 24 weeks. In the DBT-only and the DBT+sertraline groups, DBT treatment lasted for 13 weeks, followed by an observation period of another 11 weeks. DBT treatment efficacy was evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) at baseline and after 5, 9, 13 and 24 weeks of treatment.

Results: Results showed that all three treatment modalities significantly reduced HAMD scores (p < 0.001, η = 0.749). The combined treatment group achieved the fastest reduction in HAMD score at the initial treatment stage. Whilst the Sertraline group showed a pronounced reduction by Week 13, it later exhibited a rebound in scores at 24 weeks, unlike the DBT-containing groups. In terms of emotional regulation strategies, CERQ scores indicated that DBT+sertraline significantly increased positive emotional regulation strategy scores, followed by DBT alone (DBT+sertraline vs DBT, p < 0.001), whilst the sertraline-alone group had the smallest increase (DBT+sertraline vs sertraline, p < 0.001) This pattern was particularly pronounced in the Positive Reappraisal subscale. Negative emotional regulation strategy scores were significantly reduced across all treatment groups, especially for the Self-blame item, with the largest reduction observed in the DBT+sertraline group, followed by the DBT alone (DBT+sertraline vs DBT, no significance) and sertraline-alone (DBT+sertraline vs sertraline, p < 0.001) groups.

Conclusions: This study's findings demonstrate that DBT and sertraline can improve emotional regulation abilities and effectively alleviate symptoms of depression in adolescents. In particular, superior outcomes were observed in the combined treatment group compared to the individual treatment groups. These findings aim to provide guidance and reference for clinicians, mental health professionals, policymakers and families of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Actas espanolas de psiquiatria
Actas espanolas de psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría publicará de manera preferente trabajos relacionados con investigación clínica en el área de la Psiquiatría, la Psicología Clínica y la Salud Mental.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信