帕金森病12个月的生活质量比较侵入性器械辅助治疗与口服治疗

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora, Michael S. Okun, Pavnit Kukreja, Wei Hu
{"title":"帕金森病12个月的生活质量比较侵入性器械辅助治疗与口服治疗","authors":"Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora, Michael S. Okun, Pavnit Kukreja, Wei Hu","doi":"10.1038/s41531-025-01093-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Real-world impact of device-aided therapy on quality of life (QoL) in people with Parkinson’s remains unknown. This large, retrospective, observational study assessed QoL in people transitioning to device-aided therapy (deep brain stimulation or carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension) vs. those continuing oral medications. Cohorts were matched based on clinical/demographic characteristics and device-aided therapy eligibility. Primary and secondary outcomes included change from baseline (CFB) to month 12 in 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores, respectively. Of 608 people (oral therapy [<i>n</i> = 295]; device-aided therapy [<i>n</i> = 313]), most were male, White, and aged ≥ 60 years. Positive CFB to month 12 in PDQ-39 was significantly greater for device-aided therapy vs. oral therapy (–5.0 [95% CI, –5.9 to –4.2] vs. 0.9 [0.3–1.5]; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). UPDRS II-IV scores improved for the device-aided therapy group. People transitioning to device-aided therapy experienced clinically meaningful QoL improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":19706,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parkinson’s disease quality of life at 12 months comparing invasive device-aided therapy with oral treatment\",\"authors\":\"Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora, Michael S. Okun, Pavnit Kukreja, Wei Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41531-025-01093-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Real-world impact of device-aided therapy on quality of life (QoL) in people with Parkinson’s remains unknown. This large, retrospective, observational study assessed QoL in people transitioning to device-aided therapy (deep brain stimulation or carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension) vs. those continuing oral medications. Cohorts were matched based on clinical/demographic characteristics and device-aided therapy eligibility. Primary and secondary outcomes included change from baseline (CFB) to month 12 in 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores, respectively. Of 608 people (oral therapy [<i>n</i> = 295]; device-aided therapy [<i>n</i> = 313]), most were male, White, and aged ≥ 60 years. Positive CFB to month 12 in PDQ-39 was significantly greater for device-aided therapy vs. oral therapy (–5.0 [95% CI, –5.9 to –4.2] vs. 0.9 [0.3–1.5]; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). UPDRS II-IV scores improved for the device-aided therapy group. People transitioning to device-aided therapy experienced clinically meaningful QoL improvements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-01093-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-01093-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设备辅助治疗对帕金森病患者生活质量(QoL)的实际影响尚不清楚。这项大型、回顾性、观察性研究评估了过渡到器械辅助治疗(深部脑刺激或卡比多巴-左旋多巴肠内悬液)与继续口服药物治疗的患者的生活质量。根据临床/人口学特征和器械辅助治疗资格对队列进行匹配。主要和次要结局分别包括39项帕金森病问卷(PDQ-39)和统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)评分从基线(CFB)到12个月的变化。608例患者(口服治疗[n = 295];器械辅助治疗[n = 313]),大多数为男性,白人,年龄≥60岁。到第12个月,器械辅助治疗的PDQ-39 CFB阳性显著高于口服治疗(-5.0 [95% CI, -5.9至-4.2]vs. 0.9 [0.3-1.5];p < 0.001)。器械辅助治疗组UPDRS II-IV评分提高。过渡到器械辅助治疗的患者经历了临床上有意义的生活质量改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Parkinson’s disease quality of life at 12 months comparing invasive device-aided therapy with oral treatment

Parkinson’s disease quality of life at 12 months comparing invasive device-aided therapy with oral treatment

Real-world impact of device-aided therapy on quality of life (QoL) in people with Parkinson’s remains unknown. This large, retrospective, observational study assessed QoL in people transitioning to device-aided therapy (deep brain stimulation or carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension) vs. those continuing oral medications. Cohorts were matched based on clinical/demographic characteristics and device-aided therapy eligibility. Primary and secondary outcomes included change from baseline (CFB) to month 12 in 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores, respectively. Of 608 people (oral therapy [n = 295]; device-aided therapy [n = 313]), most were male, White, and aged ≥ 60 years. Positive CFB to month 12 in PDQ-39 was significantly greater for device-aided therapy vs. oral therapy (–5.0 [95% CI, –5.9 to –4.2] vs. 0.9 [0.3–1.5]; p < 0.001). UPDRS II-IV scores improved for the device-aided therapy group. People transitioning to device-aided therapy experienced clinically meaningful QoL improvements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Parkinson's Disease
NPJ Parkinson's Disease Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
156
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Parkinson's Disease is a comprehensive open access journal that covers a wide range of research areas related to Parkinson's disease. It publishes original studies in basic science, translational research, and clinical investigations. The journal is dedicated to advancing our understanding of Parkinson's disease by exploring various aspects such as anatomy, etiology, genetics, cellular and molecular physiology, neurophysiology, epidemiology, and therapeutic development. By providing free and immediate access to the scientific and Parkinson's disease community, npj Parkinson's Disease promotes collaboration and knowledge sharing among researchers and healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信