Xinzhu Zheng, Ling Zhang, Yuxin Bai, Jianhui Cong, Tianyi Zhang, Yue Ren, Jie Li, Yang Su, Junyuan Xu, Can Wang
{"title":"清洁供暖转型中的异质家庭响应和室内温度不平等","authors":"Xinzhu Zheng, Ling Zhang, Yuxin Bai, Jianhui Cong, Tianyi Zhang, Yue Ren, Jie Li, Yang Su, Junyuan Xu, Can Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eng.2025.07.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The residential clean heating transition has proven effective in reducing air pollution and improving public health. However, most research to date has focused on its economic and environmental implications, with limited attention being paid to household behavioral responses and heating experiences. To address this gap, we conducted household surveys in Linfen, a city in northern China, and analyzed residents’ self-reported indoor temperatures, heating costs, and heated areas before and after the transition. The results reveal substantial disparities across clean heating pathways. Compared with households that are continuing to use coal or biomass, those switching to gas experienced a 1.7 °C drop in indoor temperature and an annual cost increase of 1318 CNY, suggesting energy-limiting behaviors in response to higher expenses. In contrast, households adopting electric heating reported a 1.2 °C temperature increase without a significant rise in costs. Further analysis using the Gini coefficient and Oshima index shows that indoor temperature inequality increased among coal-to-gas households, while no such trend was observed among coal-to-electricity households. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating behavioral responses and thermal equity into the design of clean heating strategies.","PeriodicalId":11783,"journal":{"name":"Engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneous Household Responses and Indoor Temperature Inequality in the Clean Heating Transition\",\"authors\":\"Xinzhu Zheng, Ling Zhang, Yuxin Bai, Jianhui Cong, Tianyi Zhang, Yue Ren, Jie Li, Yang Su, Junyuan Xu, Can Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eng.2025.07.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The residential clean heating transition has proven effective in reducing air pollution and improving public health. However, most research to date has focused on its economic and environmental implications, with limited attention being paid to household behavioral responses and heating experiences. To address this gap, we conducted household surveys in Linfen, a city in northern China, and analyzed residents’ self-reported indoor temperatures, heating costs, and heated areas before and after the transition. The results reveal substantial disparities across clean heating pathways. Compared with households that are continuing to use coal or biomass, those switching to gas experienced a 1.7 °C drop in indoor temperature and an annual cost increase of 1318 CNY, suggesting energy-limiting behaviors in response to higher expenses. In contrast, households adopting electric heating reported a 1.2 °C temperature increase without a significant rise in costs. Further analysis using the Gini coefficient and Oshima index shows that indoor temperature inequality increased among coal-to-gas households, while no such trend was observed among coal-to-electricity households. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating behavioral responses and thermal equity into the design of clean heating strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.07.034\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.07.034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Heterogeneous Household Responses and Indoor Temperature Inequality in the Clean Heating Transition
The residential clean heating transition has proven effective in reducing air pollution and improving public health. However, most research to date has focused on its economic and environmental implications, with limited attention being paid to household behavioral responses and heating experiences. To address this gap, we conducted household surveys in Linfen, a city in northern China, and analyzed residents’ self-reported indoor temperatures, heating costs, and heated areas before and after the transition. The results reveal substantial disparities across clean heating pathways. Compared with households that are continuing to use coal or biomass, those switching to gas experienced a 1.7 °C drop in indoor temperature and an annual cost increase of 1318 CNY, suggesting energy-limiting behaviors in response to higher expenses. In contrast, households adopting electric heating reported a 1.2 °C temperature increase without a significant rise in costs. Further analysis using the Gini coefficient and Oshima index shows that indoor temperature inequality increased among coal-to-gas households, while no such trend was observed among coal-to-electricity households. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating behavioral responses and thermal equity into the design of clean heating strategies.
期刊介绍:
Engineering, an international open-access journal initiated by the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE) in 2015, serves as a distinguished platform for disseminating cutting-edge advancements in engineering R&D, sharing major research outputs, and highlighting key achievements worldwide. The journal's objectives encompass reporting progress in engineering science, fostering discussions on hot topics, addressing areas of interest, challenges, and prospects in engineering development, while considering human and environmental well-being and ethics in engineering. It aims to inspire breakthroughs and innovations with profound economic and social significance, propelling them to advanced international standards and transforming them into a new productive force. Ultimately, this endeavor seeks to bring about positive changes globally, benefit humanity, and shape a new future.