传递钥匙:用行为经济学来探索吸食大麻后的驾驶。

Brandon P Miller, Elizabeth R Aston, Tory R Spindle, Michael Amlung
{"title":"传递钥匙:用行为经济学来探索吸食大麻后的驾驶。","authors":"Brandon P Miller, Elizabeth R Aston, Tory R Spindle, Michael Amlung","doi":"10.1177/29767342251360851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Controlled studies show cannabis impairs driving performance and may increase crash risk. Recent approaches in behavioral economics have used marijuana purchase tasks (MPTs) to understand driving after cannabis use (DACU). One factor that may influence DACU is the latency between smoking and having to drive.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A crowdsourced sample of adults who smoke cannabis at least monthly (n = 167; 77% White; 45% women; mean age = 38.55) completed 4 MPTs in the context of different instructional vignettes with different smoked cannabis use and driving latencies (non-driving; 20 minutes, 1 hour, and 6 hours). Participants reported frequency and perceived dangerousness of DACU. Demand indices included intensity (consumption when free), breakpoint (last price with any consumption), <i>O</i><sub>max</sub> (maximum expenditure), and <i>P</i><sub>max</sub> (price at <i>O</i><sub>max</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed main effects of latency on all demand indices (ps <0.001), attributed to lower demand in each of the DACU conditions relative to the non-driving condition (ps <0.015; ds = 0.09-1.52). Demand increased in a linear fashion as latency increased. Participants with a history of DACU showed a blunted reduction in demand (except breakpoint) at each latency compared to participants with no DACU history (ps <0.043; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.008-0.043). Perceived dangerousness was inversely correlated with demand (except breakpoint; <i>r</i>s -0.29 to -0.62, ps <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cannabis demand is sensitive to specific parameters surrounding driving contingencies, and risk perceptions may contribute to these associations. Future research is needed to extend these findings and identify other factors impacting DACU, such as different routes of administration or road conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342251360851"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pass the Keys: Using Behavioral Economics to Explore Driving After Cannabis Use.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon P Miller, Elizabeth R Aston, Tory R Spindle, Michael Amlung\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/29767342251360851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Controlled studies show cannabis impairs driving performance and may increase crash risk. Recent approaches in behavioral economics have used marijuana purchase tasks (MPTs) to understand driving after cannabis use (DACU). One factor that may influence DACU is the latency between smoking and having to drive.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A crowdsourced sample of adults who smoke cannabis at least monthly (n = 167; 77% White; 45% women; mean age = 38.55) completed 4 MPTs in the context of different instructional vignettes with different smoked cannabis use and driving latencies (non-driving; 20 minutes, 1 hour, and 6 hours). Participants reported frequency and perceived dangerousness of DACU. Demand indices included intensity (consumption when free), breakpoint (last price with any consumption), <i>O</i><sub>max</sub> (maximum expenditure), and <i>P</i><sub>max</sub> (price at <i>O</i><sub>max</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed main effects of latency on all demand indices (ps <0.001), attributed to lower demand in each of the DACU conditions relative to the non-driving condition (ps <0.015; ds = 0.09-1.52). Demand increased in a linear fashion as latency increased. Participants with a history of DACU showed a blunted reduction in demand (except breakpoint) at each latency compared to participants with no DACU history (ps <0.043; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.008-0.043). Perceived dangerousness was inversely correlated with demand (except breakpoint; <i>r</i>s -0.29 to -0.62, ps <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cannabis demand is sensitive to specific parameters surrounding driving contingencies, and risk perceptions may contribute to these associations. Future research is needed to extend these findings and identify other factors impacting DACU, such as different routes of administration or road conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance use & addiction journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"29767342251360851\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance use & addiction journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251360851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251360851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对照研究表明,大麻会损害驾驶性能,并可能增加撞车风险。最近的行为经济学方法使用大麻购买任务(mpt)来理解大麻使用后驾驶(DACU)。可能影响DACU的一个因素是吸烟和不得不开车之间的潜伏期。方法:对每月至少吸食大麻的成年人进行众包抽样(n = 167;77%的白人;45%的女性;平均年龄= 38.55岁)在不同的教学场景下完成了4个mpt,不同的吸食大麻使用和驾驶潜伏期(非驾驶;20分钟,1小时,6小时)。参与者报告了DACU的频率和感知到的危险性。需求指数包括强度(空闲时的消费)、断点(任何消费的最后价格)、Omax(最大支出)和Pmax(在Omax时的价格)。结果:重复测量方差分析显示潜伏期对所有需求指标的主要影响(ps p2 = 0.008-0.043)。感知危险程度与需求呈负相关(断点除外;结论:大麻需求对驾驶突发事件周围的特定参数敏感,风险感知可能有助于这些关联。未来的研究需要扩展这些发现,并确定影响DACU的其他因素,如不同的管理路线或道路条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pass the Keys: Using Behavioral Economics to Explore Driving After Cannabis Use.

Background: Controlled studies show cannabis impairs driving performance and may increase crash risk. Recent approaches in behavioral economics have used marijuana purchase tasks (MPTs) to understand driving after cannabis use (DACU). One factor that may influence DACU is the latency between smoking and having to drive.

Method: A crowdsourced sample of adults who smoke cannabis at least monthly (n = 167; 77% White; 45% women; mean age = 38.55) completed 4 MPTs in the context of different instructional vignettes with different smoked cannabis use and driving latencies (non-driving; 20 minutes, 1 hour, and 6 hours). Participants reported frequency and perceived dangerousness of DACU. Demand indices included intensity (consumption when free), breakpoint (last price with any consumption), Omax (maximum expenditure), and Pmax (price at Omax).

Results: Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed main effects of latency on all demand indices (ps <0.001), attributed to lower demand in each of the DACU conditions relative to the non-driving condition (ps <0.015; ds = 0.09-1.52). Demand increased in a linear fashion as latency increased. Participants with a history of DACU showed a blunted reduction in demand (except breakpoint) at each latency compared to participants with no DACU history (ps <0.043; ηp2 = 0.008-0.043). Perceived dangerousness was inversely correlated with demand (except breakpoint; rs -0.29 to -0.62, ps <0.05).

Conclusions: Cannabis demand is sensitive to specific parameters surrounding driving contingencies, and risk perceptions may contribute to these associations. Future research is needed to extend these findings and identify other factors impacting DACU, such as different routes of administration or road conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信