超声治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.3
Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-10 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2025.2543056
Xuan Li, Jiao Yang, Shuhan Li, Liuxin Yang, Dianhuai Meng
{"title":"超声治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xuan Li, Jiao Yang, Shuhan Li, Liuxin Yang, Dianhuai Meng","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2025.2543056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound (US) has been widely used in the treatment of plantar fasciitis (PF); however, its therapeutic effect remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of ultrasound (US) on pain intensity and foot function in patients with PF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and other databases were systematically searched from inception to July 2024. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen trials were performed. There was no difference in pain relief between US alone and no treatment, as was US plus conventional physical exercises (CPE) compared with CPE alone. In the comparison between the US plus CPE group and the other interventions plus CPE group, there was a statistically significant difference in pain intensity (MD = 0.78, 95%CI= 0.12 to 1.44, <i>p</i> = 0.02), except in the case where extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) acted as an \"other intervention\" (MD = 0.75, 95%CI= -0.28 to 1.78, <i>p</i> = 0.15). The foot function measured in the Foot Function Index (FFI) showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (MD =9.20, 95%CI = 0.77 to 17.63, <i>p</i> = 0.03), while the American Orthopaedic Foot showed no statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whether applied alone or in combination with CPE, US cannot reduce pain intensity in patients with PF. However, US in combination with CPE may improve foot function.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2543056"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of ultrasound for plantar fasciitis, a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xuan Li, Jiao Yang, Shuhan Li, Liuxin Yang, Dianhuai Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07853890.2025.2543056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound (US) has been widely used in the treatment of plantar fasciitis (PF); however, its therapeutic effect remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of ultrasound (US) on pain intensity and foot function in patients with PF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and other databases were systematically searched from inception to July 2024. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen trials were performed. There was no difference in pain relief between US alone and no treatment, as was US plus conventional physical exercises (CPE) compared with CPE alone. In the comparison between the US plus CPE group and the other interventions plus CPE group, there was a statistically significant difference in pain intensity (MD = 0.78, 95%CI= 0.12 to 1.44, <i>p</i> = 0.02), except in the case where extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) acted as an \\\"other intervention\\\" (MD = 0.75, 95%CI= -0.28 to 1.78, <i>p</i> = 0.15). The foot function measured in the Foot Function Index (FFI) showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (MD =9.20, 95%CI = 0.77 to 17.63, <i>p</i> = 0.03), while the American Orthopaedic Foot showed no statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whether applied alone or in combination with CPE, US cannot reduce pain intensity in patients with PF. However, US in combination with CPE may improve foot function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"2543056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340940/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2543056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2543056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超声(US)已广泛应用于足底筋膜炎(PF)的治疗;然而,其治疗效果尚不清楚。目的:本荟萃分析旨在探讨超声(US)对脑瘫患者疼痛强度和足部功能的影响。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library等数据库,检索时间自成立至2024年7月。采用RevMan 5.3进行meta分析。结果:共进行了13次试验。在疼痛缓解方面,单独进行US和不进行治疗之间没有差异,同时进行常规体育锻炼(CPE)与单独进行CPE相比也没有差异。在US + CPE组与其他干预+ CPE组的比较中,除了体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)作为“其他干预”(MD = 0.75, 95%CI= -0.28 ~ 1.78, p = 0.15)外,疼痛强度差异有统计学意义(MD = 0.78, 95%CI= 0.12 ~ 1.44, p = 0.02)。足功能指数(FFI)测量的足功能两组间差异有统计学意义(MD =9.20, 95%CI = 0.77 ~ 17.63, p = 0.03),而American Orthopaedic foot两组间差异无统计学意义。结论:无论是单独应用还是与CPE联合应用,US都不能减轻PF患者的疼痛强度,但US与CPE联合应用可改善足部功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of ultrasound for plantar fasciitis, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Ultrasound (US) has been widely used in the treatment of plantar fasciitis (PF); however, its therapeutic effect remains unclear.

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of ultrasound (US) on pain intensity and foot function in patients with PF.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and other databases were systematically searched from inception to July 2024. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.

Results: Thirteen trials were performed. There was no difference in pain relief between US alone and no treatment, as was US plus conventional physical exercises (CPE) compared with CPE alone. In the comparison between the US plus CPE group and the other interventions plus CPE group, there was a statistically significant difference in pain intensity (MD = 0.78, 95%CI= 0.12 to 1.44, p = 0.02), except in the case where extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) acted as an "other intervention" (MD = 0.75, 95%CI= -0.28 to 1.78, p = 0.15). The foot function measured in the Foot Function Index (FFI) showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (MD =9.20, 95%CI = 0.77 to 17.63, p = 0.03), while the American Orthopaedic Foot showed no statistically significant difference.

Conclusion: Whether applied alone or in combination with CPE, US cannot reduce pain intensity in patients with PF. However, US in combination with CPE may improve foot function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信