全球支气管镜检查实践和培训方法的评估:一项WABIP调查。

IF 0.6 0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Silvia Quadrelli, Agustin Buero, Stefano Gasparini
{"title":"全球支气管镜检查实践和培训方法的评估:一项WABIP调查。","authors":"Silvia Quadrelli, Agustin Buero, Stefano Gasparini","doi":"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-3-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The practice of bronchoscopy is not standardized. Regional and global variations in bronchoscopy practice are exacerbated by the paucity of recommendations regarding technical aspects in major bronchoscopy guidelines. The aim of this survey was to examine the prevalent practices, adherence to guidelines, and training requirements of bronchoscopy in different countries. The Membership Committee and the Education Committee of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology designed an online survey that was sent to 1,300 consultant physicians in adult respiratory medicine from 64 countries across five continents. The questionnaire included questions regarding bronchoscopy practice. We obtained 879 responses (67.0%). In 81.2% of cases, the practice occurred in cities with over 200,000 inhabitants. The median number of years in practice was 14 (range 1-50). Only 11% of respondents perform routine bronchoscopy without anesthesia. Spirometry was always performed before bronchoscopy by only 106 physicians (12.4%), blood coagulation tests were always required by 533 (60.6%) and an electrocardiography was always required by 339 (38.5%). The main indications for performing a bronchoscopy were suspicion of cancer (78.6%), suspicion of non tuberculosis (TB) infection (10.6%), and suspicion of TB (6.7%). 39.3% of responders received formal training for at least 6 months with a formal certificate. Despite the wide availability of bronchoscopy guidelines, the way to do them in terms of preparation, anesthesia, technical aspects, etc., varies greatly in each country and physician.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Worldwide Bronchoscopy Practices and Training Methods: A WABIP Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Quadrelli, Agustin Buero, Stefano Gasparini\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-3-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The practice of bronchoscopy is not standardized. Regional and global variations in bronchoscopy practice are exacerbated by the paucity of recommendations regarding technical aspects in major bronchoscopy guidelines. The aim of this survey was to examine the prevalent practices, adherence to guidelines, and training requirements of bronchoscopy in different countries. The Membership Committee and the Education Committee of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology designed an online survey that was sent to 1,300 consultant physicians in adult respiratory medicine from 64 countries across five continents. The questionnaire included questions regarding bronchoscopy practice. We obtained 879 responses (67.0%). In 81.2% of cases, the practice occurred in cities with over 200,000 inhabitants. The median number of years in practice was 14 (range 1-50). Only 11% of respondents perform routine bronchoscopy without anesthesia. Spirometry was always performed before bronchoscopy by only 106 physicians (12.4%), blood coagulation tests were always required by 533 (60.6%) and an electrocardiography was always required by 339 (38.5%). The main indications for performing a bronchoscopy were suspicion of cancer (78.6%), suspicion of non tuberculosis (TB) infection (10.6%), and suspicion of TB (6.7%). 39.3% of responders received formal training for at least 6 months with a formal certificate. Despite the wide availability of bronchoscopy guidelines, the way to do them in terms of preparation, anesthesia, technical aspects, etc., varies greatly in each country and physician.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic research and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-3-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-3-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

支气管镜检查的实践尚未标准化。主要支气管镜检查指南中缺乏技术方面的建议,加剧了支气管镜检查实践的区域和全球差异。本调查的目的是检查不同国家支气管镜检查的流行做法、对指南的遵守情况和培训要求。世界支气管学和介入肺病学协会的成员委员会和教育委员会设计了一项在线调查,该调查向来自五大洲64个国家的1,300名成人呼吸医学顾问医生发送。问卷包括有关支气管镜检查的问题。我们获得879份回复(67.0%)。81.2%的案例发生在人口超过20万的城市。中位数执业年数为14年(范围1-50年)。只有11%的应答者在没有麻醉的情况下进行常规支气管镜检查。只有106名医生(12.4%)在支气管镜检查前总是做肺活量测定,533名医生(60.6%)总是做凝血试验,339名医生(38.5%)总是做心电图。支气管镜检查的主要指征为怀疑癌症(78.6%)、怀疑非结核(TB)感染(10.6%)和怀疑结核(6.7%)。39.3%的应答者接受过至少6个月的正规培训,并获得正规证书。尽管支气管镜检查指南广泛可用,但在准备、麻醉、技术等方面,每个国家和医生的方法差异很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Worldwide Bronchoscopy Practices and Training Methods: A WABIP Survey.

The practice of bronchoscopy is not standardized. Regional and global variations in bronchoscopy practice are exacerbated by the paucity of recommendations regarding technical aspects in major bronchoscopy guidelines. The aim of this survey was to examine the prevalent practices, adherence to guidelines, and training requirements of bronchoscopy in different countries. The Membership Committee and the Education Committee of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology designed an online survey that was sent to 1,300 consultant physicians in adult respiratory medicine from 64 countries across five continents. The questionnaire included questions regarding bronchoscopy practice. We obtained 879 responses (67.0%). In 81.2% of cases, the practice occurred in cities with over 200,000 inhabitants. The median number of years in practice was 14 (range 1-50). Only 11% of respondents perform routine bronchoscopy without anesthesia. Spirometry was always performed before bronchoscopy by only 106 physicians (12.4%), blood coagulation tests were always required by 533 (60.6%) and an electrocardiography was always required by 339 (38.5%). The main indications for performing a bronchoscopy were suspicion of cancer (78.6%), suspicion of non tuberculosis (TB) infection (10.6%), and suspicion of TB (6.7%). 39.3% of responders received formal training for at least 6 months with a formal certificate. Despite the wide availability of bronchoscopy guidelines, the way to do them in terms of preparation, anesthesia, technical aspects, etc., varies greatly in each country and physician.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信