探索在阿拉木图,哈萨克斯坦参保和未参保妇女对妇产科护理满意度的差异:一项比较横断面研究。

IF 2.4 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2025.1580888
Sholpan Aliyeva, Vyacheslav Lokshin, Maksut Kamaliev, Sholpan Sarmuldayeva, Gani Kaldybayev, Oxana Tsigengagel
{"title":"探索在阿拉木图,哈萨克斯坦参保和未参保妇女对妇产科护理满意度的差异:一项比较横断面研究。","authors":"Sholpan Aliyeva, Vyacheslav Lokshin, Maksut Kamaliev, Sholpan Sarmuldayeva, Gani Kaldybayev, Oxana Tsigengagel","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1580888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality. Although crucial, limited research has explored factors contributing to satisfaction disparities in outpatient obstetric-gynecological care, particularly in Kazakhstan. The objective of the study is to explore disparities in satisfaction with obstetric-gynecological care between insured and uninsured women in Almaty, Kazakhstan, and to identify the key determinants of patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 107 insured and uninsured patients over three months in early 2024 at a hospital in the Almaty region, Kazakhstan. Using a five-point Likert scale, a structured questionnaire assessed socio-demographics, patient-reported experiences with the care process, and overall satisfaction across 16 dimensions. The survey instrument was pilot-tested and demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83). Chi-square tests examined associations, and multivariable logistic regression identified key predictors of patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A multivariable analysis revealed a \"satisfaction paradox\": insured patients had lower odds of being satisfied compared to uninsured patients (AOR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.81). Specifically, a lack of insurance was associated with higher reported satisfaction in doctor-patient communication (OR = 1.8) and nursing care (OR = 2.1). Other significant predictors of satisfaction included having kidney disease and a shorter hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that expanding insurance coverage is necessary for access but insufficient for ensuring patient satisfaction. The observed \"satisfaction paradox\" highlights that policy must adopt a dual focus: promoting enrolment while simultaneously improving the quality of patient-provider interactions to meet the higher expectations of insured patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1580888"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring disparities in satisfaction with obstetric-gynecological care among insured and uninsured women in Almaty, Kazakhstan: a comparative cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Sholpan Aliyeva, Vyacheslav Lokshin, Maksut Kamaliev, Sholpan Sarmuldayeva, Gani Kaldybayev, Oxana Tsigengagel\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1580888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality. Although crucial, limited research has explored factors contributing to satisfaction disparities in outpatient obstetric-gynecological care, particularly in Kazakhstan. The objective of the study is to explore disparities in satisfaction with obstetric-gynecological care between insured and uninsured women in Almaty, Kazakhstan, and to identify the key determinants of patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 107 insured and uninsured patients over three months in early 2024 at a hospital in the Almaty region, Kazakhstan. Using a five-point Likert scale, a structured questionnaire assessed socio-demographics, patient-reported experiences with the care process, and overall satisfaction across 16 dimensions. The survey instrument was pilot-tested and demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83). Chi-square tests examined associations, and multivariable logistic regression identified key predictors of patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A multivariable analysis revealed a \\\"satisfaction paradox\\\": insured patients had lower odds of being satisfied compared to uninsured patients (AOR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.81). Specifically, a lack of insurance was associated with higher reported satisfaction in doctor-patient communication (OR = 1.8) and nursing care (OR = 2.1). Other significant predictors of satisfaction included having kidney disease and a shorter hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that expanding insurance coverage is necessary for access but insufficient for ensuring patient satisfaction. The observed \\\"satisfaction paradox\\\" highlights that policy must adopt a dual focus: promoting enrolment while simultaneously improving the quality of patient-provider interactions to meet the higher expectations of insured patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1580888\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1580888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1580888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者满意度是医疗保健质量的关键指标。尽管至关重要,有限的研究探索了导致门诊妇产科护理满意度差异的因素,特别是在哈萨克斯坦。本研究的目的是探讨在阿拉木图,哈萨克斯坦参保和未参保妇女之间的妇产科护理满意度的差异,并确定患者满意度的关键决定因素。方法:对2024年初在哈萨克斯坦阿拉木图地区某医院就诊的107例参保和未参保患者进行为期3个月的横断面调查。使用五点李克特量表,一份结构化的问卷评估了社会人口统计学,患者报告的护理过程经验,以及16个维度的总体满意度。该调查工具进行了试点测试,显示出较强的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.83)。卡方检验检验了相关性,多变量逻辑回归确定了患者满意度的关键预测因素。结果:多变量分析揭示了一个“满意度悖论”:参保患者的满意度比未参保患者低(AOR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.81)。具体而言,缺乏保险与医患沟通(OR = 1.8)和护理(OR = 2.1)较高的满意度相关。其他重要的满意度预测因素包括是否患有肾脏疾病和住院时间较短。结论:我们的研究结果表明,扩大保险覆盖范围是必要的,但不足以确保患者满意度。观察到的“满意度悖论”强调了政策必须采取双重重点:促进注册,同时提高患者与提供者互动的质量,以满足参保患者的更高期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring disparities in satisfaction with obstetric-gynecological care among insured and uninsured women in Almaty, Kazakhstan: a comparative cross-sectional study.

Background: Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality. Although crucial, limited research has explored factors contributing to satisfaction disparities in outpatient obstetric-gynecological care, particularly in Kazakhstan. The objective of the study is to explore disparities in satisfaction with obstetric-gynecological care between insured and uninsured women in Almaty, Kazakhstan, and to identify the key determinants of patient satisfaction.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 107 insured and uninsured patients over three months in early 2024 at a hospital in the Almaty region, Kazakhstan. Using a five-point Likert scale, a structured questionnaire assessed socio-demographics, patient-reported experiences with the care process, and overall satisfaction across 16 dimensions. The survey instrument was pilot-tested and demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83). Chi-square tests examined associations, and multivariable logistic regression identified key predictors of patient satisfaction.

Results: A multivariable analysis revealed a "satisfaction paradox": insured patients had lower odds of being satisfied compared to uninsured patients (AOR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.81). Specifically, a lack of insurance was associated with higher reported satisfaction in doctor-patient communication (OR = 1.8) and nursing care (OR = 2.1). Other significant predictors of satisfaction included having kidney disease and a shorter hospital stay.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that expanding insurance coverage is necessary for access but insufficient for ensuring patient satisfaction. The observed "satisfaction paradox" highlights that policy must adopt a dual focus: promoting enrolment while simultaneously improving the quality of patient-provider interactions to meet the higher expectations of insured patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信