哪种疫苗更有利于降低深静脉血栓形成的风险,CoronaVac、BNT162b2还是TURKOVAC?

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Science Progress Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-10 DOI:10.1177/00368504251366362
Süleyman Yazıcı, Osman Fehmi Beyazal, Hasan Tezcan
{"title":"哪种疫苗更有利于降低深静脉血栓形成的风险,CoronaVac、BNT162b2还是TURKOVAC?","authors":"Süleyman Yazıcı, Osman Fehmi Beyazal, Hasan Tezcan","doi":"10.1177/00368504251366362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to reveal the relationship between TURKOVAC, CoronaVac, and BNT162b2 and deep vein thrombosis.MethodsBetween 2022 and 2024, a case-control study was planned with 400 patients included (deep vein thrombosis group (<i>n</i> = 200) and control group (<i>n</i> = 200). Patients were divided into four groups according to their vaccine types. Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 54): those who received only CoronaVac, Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 233): those who received only BNT162b2, Group 3 (<i>n</i> = 49): those who received CoronaVac for the first dose, and then BNT162b2, Group 4 (<i>n</i> = 15): those who received BNT162b2 for the first dose and then TURKOVAC. First, the deep vein thrombosis and control groups were compared regarding basic characteristics. Then, patients in the four groups were compared in terms of deep vein thrombosis.ResultsNo difference was found in the frequency of COVID-19 disease in the deep vein thrombosis and control groups. The frequency of vaccination was lower in the deep vein thrombosis group (84%-91.5%). According to the multivariate regression test result, we found that COVID-19 vaccination was protective against deep vein thrombosis (<i>p</i> = 0.003, OR = 0.377 [95% CI, 0.197-0.722]). After being divided into four groups, the rates of deep vein thrombosis were 36 (66.7%), 96 (41.2%), 29 (59.2%), and 7 (46.7%), respectively. The frequency of deep vein thrombosis was significantly lower in Group 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Although no statistically significant difference was found among other groups, the lowest deep vein thrombosis frequency was found in Group 4, Group 3, and Group 1, respectively.ConclusionThe frequency of COVID-19 vaccination was lower in patients with deep vein thrombosis than in those without. Deep vein thrombosis was least common in patients who received only BNT162b2. Although the frequency of deep vein thrombosis was similar in the groups, we found that the lowest rate of deep vein thrombosis was in the group that received TURKOVAC after BNT162b2.</p>","PeriodicalId":56061,"journal":{"name":"Science Progress","volume":"108 3","pages":"368504251366362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which type of vaccine is more beneficial for reducing the risk of deep vein thrombosis, CoronaVac, BNT162b2, or TURKOVAC?\",\"authors\":\"Süleyman Yazıcı, Osman Fehmi Beyazal, Hasan Tezcan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00368504251366362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to reveal the relationship between TURKOVAC, CoronaVac, and BNT162b2 and deep vein thrombosis.MethodsBetween 2022 and 2024, a case-control study was planned with 400 patients included (deep vein thrombosis group (<i>n</i> = 200) and control group (<i>n</i> = 200). Patients were divided into four groups according to their vaccine types. Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 54): those who received only CoronaVac, Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 233): those who received only BNT162b2, Group 3 (<i>n</i> = 49): those who received CoronaVac for the first dose, and then BNT162b2, Group 4 (<i>n</i> = 15): those who received BNT162b2 for the first dose and then TURKOVAC. First, the deep vein thrombosis and control groups were compared regarding basic characteristics. Then, patients in the four groups were compared in terms of deep vein thrombosis.ResultsNo difference was found in the frequency of COVID-19 disease in the deep vein thrombosis and control groups. The frequency of vaccination was lower in the deep vein thrombosis group (84%-91.5%). According to the multivariate regression test result, we found that COVID-19 vaccination was protective against deep vein thrombosis (<i>p</i> = 0.003, OR = 0.377 [95% CI, 0.197-0.722]). After being divided into four groups, the rates of deep vein thrombosis were 36 (66.7%), 96 (41.2%), 29 (59.2%), and 7 (46.7%), respectively. The frequency of deep vein thrombosis was significantly lower in Group 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Although no statistically significant difference was found among other groups, the lowest deep vein thrombosis frequency was found in Group 4, Group 3, and Group 1, respectively.ConclusionThe frequency of COVID-19 vaccination was lower in patients with deep vein thrombosis than in those without. Deep vein thrombosis was least common in patients who received only BNT162b2. Although the frequency of deep vein thrombosis was similar in the groups, we found that the lowest rate of deep vein thrombosis was in the group that received TURKOVAC after BNT162b2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Progress\",\"volume\":\"108 3\",\"pages\":\"368504251366362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340335/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251366362\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Progress","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251366362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨TURKOVAC、CoronaVac、BNT162b2与深静脉血栓形成的关系。方法在2022 - 2024年间,选取深静脉血栓组(n = 200)和对照组(n = 200) 400例患者进行病例对照研究。根据疫苗类型将患者分为四组。第1组(n = 54):仅接受CoronaVac治疗的患者;第2组(n = 233):仅接受BNT162b2治疗的患者;第3组(n = 49):首次接受CoronaVac治疗后再接受BNT162b2治疗的患者;第4组(n = 15):首次接受BNT162b2治疗后再接受TURKOVAC治疗的患者。首先比较深静脉血栓形成组与对照组的基本特征。然后比较四组患者深静脉血栓形成情况。结果深静脉血栓组与对照组新冠肺炎发病频次差异无统计学意义。深静脉血栓组疫苗接种率较低(84% ~ 91.5%)。根据多因素回归检验结果,我们发现COVID-19疫苗接种对深静脉血栓形成具有保护作用(p = 0.003, OR = 0.377 [95% CI, 0.197-0.722])。分为4组后,深静脉血栓发生率分别为36例(66.7%)、96例(41.2%)、29例(59.2%)、7例(46.7%)。2组深静脉血栓发生率明显降低(p = 0.003)。各组间无统计学差异,但组4、组3、组1深静脉血栓发生率最低。结论深静脉血栓患者的COVID-19疫苗接种频率低于无深静脉血栓患者。深静脉血栓在仅接受BNT162b2治疗的患者中最不常见。虽然两组深静脉血栓发生率相似,但我们发现BNT162b2后TURKOVAC组深静脉血栓发生率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which type of vaccine is more beneficial for reducing the risk of deep vein thrombosis, CoronaVac, BNT162b2, or TURKOVAC?

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to reveal the relationship between TURKOVAC, CoronaVac, and BNT162b2 and deep vein thrombosis.MethodsBetween 2022 and 2024, a case-control study was planned with 400 patients included (deep vein thrombosis group (n = 200) and control group (n = 200). Patients were divided into four groups according to their vaccine types. Group 1 (n = 54): those who received only CoronaVac, Group 2 (n = 233): those who received only BNT162b2, Group 3 (n = 49): those who received CoronaVac for the first dose, and then BNT162b2, Group 4 (n = 15): those who received BNT162b2 for the first dose and then TURKOVAC. First, the deep vein thrombosis and control groups were compared regarding basic characteristics. Then, patients in the four groups were compared in terms of deep vein thrombosis.ResultsNo difference was found in the frequency of COVID-19 disease in the deep vein thrombosis and control groups. The frequency of vaccination was lower in the deep vein thrombosis group (84%-91.5%). According to the multivariate regression test result, we found that COVID-19 vaccination was protective against deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.003, OR = 0.377 [95% CI, 0.197-0.722]). After being divided into four groups, the rates of deep vein thrombosis were 36 (66.7%), 96 (41.2%), 29 (59.2%), and 7 (46.7%), respectively. The frequency of deep vein thrombosis was significantly lower in Group 2 (p = 0.003). Although no statistically significant difference was found among other groups, the lowest deep vein thrombosis frequency was found in Group 4, Group 3, and Group 1, respectively.ConclusionThe frequency of COVID-19 vaccination was lower in patients with deep vein thrombosis than in those without. Deep vein thrombosis was least common in patients who received only BNT162b2. Although the frequency of deep vein thrombosis was similar in the groups, we found that the lowest rate of deep vein thrombosis was in the group that received TURKOVAC after BNT162b2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science Progress
Science Progress Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: Science Progress has for over 100 years been a highly regarded review publication in science, technology and medicine. Its objective is to excite the readers'' interest in areas with which they may not be fully familiar but which could facilitate their interest, or even activity, in a cognate field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信