头颈部微血管重建后的气道管理:何时需要气管切开术?

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-08-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S538063
Pao-Jen Kuo, Pi-Chieh Lin, Ching-Hua Hsieh
{"title":"头颈部微血管重建后的气道管理:何时需要气管切开术?","authors":"Pao-Jen Kuo, Pi-Chieh Lin, Ching-Hua Hsieh","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S538063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Head and neck free flap reconstruction presents complex airway challenges due to postoperative swelling, bleeding, and anatomical distortion that can jeopardize breathing. Many centers once performed routine prophylactic tracheostomy for major cases, yet modern evidence favors a selective strategy. Avoiding an unnecessary tracheostomy when feasible can reduce morbidity, shorten hospital stay, accelerate return to oral intake, and lower cost. Contemporary practice relies on careful intraoperative assessment. Low-risk patients can be extubated immediately or after brief observation, whereas high-risk features-extensive tongue or base of tongue resection, bilateral neck dissection, bulky flap, or marked edema-mandate a tracheostomy to avert obstruction. There is new update to TRACHY (an acronym that represents Tumor extent, Reconstruction type, Airway anatomy, Coexisting conditions, History of prior treatment, and bilateral neck dissection \"lateralitY\") scoring systems and risk stratification tools, which assign risk points to support decisions. Once a tracheostomy is placed, decannulation proceeds when airway patency is secure, the patient is alert with a strong cough, the surgical site is stable, swallowing is safe or alternative feeding is available, capping trials are successful, and the multidisciplinary team agrees. A tailored approach therefore balances airway safety with the benefits of tracheostomy avoidance, optimizing outcomes for patients undergoing complex head and neck reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2551-2563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Airway Management Following Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction: When is a Tracheostomy Necessary?\",\"authors\":\"Pao-Jen Kuo, Pi-Chieh Lin, Ching-Hua Hsieh\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S538063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Head and neck free flap reconstruction presents complex airway challenges due to postoperative swelling, bleeding, and anatomical distortion that can jeopardize breathing. Many centers once performed routine prophylactic tracheostomy for major cases, yet modern evidence favors a selective strategy. Avoiding an unnecessary tracheostomy when feasible can reduce morbidity, shorten hospital stay, accelerate return to oral intake, and lower cost. Contemporary practice relies on careful intraoperative assessment. Low-risk patients can be extubated immediately or after brief observation, whereas high-risk features-extensive tongue or base of tongue resection, bilateral neck dissection, bulky flap, or marked edema-mandate a tracheostomy to avert obstruction. There is new update to TRACHY (an acronym that represents Tumor extent, Reconstruction type, Airway anatomy, Coexisting conditions, History of prior treatment, and bilateral neck dissection \\\"lateralitY\\\") scoring systems and risk stratification tools, which assign risk points to support decisions. Once a tracheostomy is placed, decannulation proceeds when airway patency is secure, the patient is alert with a strong cough, the surgical site is stable, swallowing is safe or alternative feeding is available, capping trials are successful, and the multidisciplinary team agrees. A tailored approach therefore balances airway safety with the benefits of tracheostomy avoidance, optimizing outcomes for patients undergoing complex head and neck reconstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2551-2563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335268/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S538063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S538063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

头颈部游离皮瓣重建由于术后肿胀、出血和解剖扭曲而危及呼吸,给气道带来了复杂的挑战。许多中心曾经对重大病例进行常规的预防性气管切开术,但现代证据支持选择性策略。在可行的情况下避免不必要的气管切开术可以减少发病率,缩短住院时间,加速恢复口服,并降低成本。当代实践依赖于仔细的术中评估。低风险患者可立即拔管或在短暂观察后拔管,而高风险患者——大面积舌或舌底切除、双侧颈部剥离、大皮瓣或明显水肿——则需要气管切开术以避免梗阻。TRACHY(代表肿瘤范围、重建类型、气道解剖、共存条件、既往治疗史和双侧颈部解剖“侧边性”的首字母缩写)评分系统和风险分层工具有了新的更新,可以分配风险点以支持决策。一旦行气管造口术,当气道通畅牢靠、患者有强烈咳嗽、手术部位稳定、吞咽安全或有替代喂养、封顶试验成功,多学科小组也同意时,进行脱管。因此,量身定制的方法平衡了气道安全与避免气管造口术的好处,优化了接受复杂头颈部重建的患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Airway Management Following Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction: When is a Tracheostomy Necessary?

Head and neck free flap reconstruction presents complex airway challenges due to postoperative swelling, bleeding, and anatomical distortion that can jeopardize breathing. Many centers once performed routine prophylactic tracheostomy for major cases, yet modern evidence favors a selective strategy. Avoiding an unnecessary tracheostomy when feasible can reduce morbidity, shorten hospital stay, accelerate return to oral intake, and lower cost. Contemporary practice relies on careful intraoperative assessment. Low-risk patients can be extubated immediately or after brief observation, whereas high-risk features-extensive tongue or base of tongue resection, bilateral neck dissection, bulky flap, or marked edema-mandate a tracheostomy to avert obstruction. There is new update to TRACHY (an acronym that represents Tumor extent, Reconstruction type, Airway anatomy, Coexisting conditions, History of prior treatment, and bilateral neck dissection "lateralitY") scoring systems and risk stratification tools, which assign risk points to support decisions. Once a tracheostomy is placed, decannulation proceeds when airway patency is secure, the patient is alert with a strong cough, the surgical site is stable, swallowing is safe or alternative feeding is available, capping trials are successful, and the multidisciplinary team agrees. A tailored approach therefore balances airway safety with the benefits of tracheostomy avoidance, optimizing outcomes for patients undergoing complex head and neck reconstruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信