预测经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流置入后的发病率和死亡率:对现有模型和未来方向的回顾。

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Moaz M Choudhary, Aria Nazeri, Amro S Aldine, Ankit R Mehta, Girish Kumar, Manoj K Kathuria, Shannan R Tujios, Arjmand R Mufti, Sanjeeva P Kalva
{"title":"预测经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流置入后的发病率和死亡率:对现有模型和未来方向的回顾。","authors":"Moaz M Choudhary, Aria Nazeri, Amro S Aldine, Ankit R Mehta, Girish Kumar, Manoj K Kathuria, Shannan R Tujios, Arjmand R Mufti, Sanjeeva P Kalva","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2025.101062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a key therapeutic intervention in the management of portal hypertension and its complications, such as variceal bleeding, hepatic hydrothorax, and refractory ascites. TIPS has historically been used as a lifesaving measure or as a bridge to liver transplantation (LT). Despite its efficacy, creation of a TIPS can be associated with significant morbidity, particularly in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Complications include hepatic encephalopathy (HE), progressive liver dysfunction, and cardiovascular compromise. As such, accurate patient selection and risk stratification are essential to optimize clinical outcomes. This review synthesizes current evidence on predictive models for post-TIPS mortality. Traditional scoring systems such as the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) remain widely used, with newer iterations such as the MELD-Na and MELD 3.0 demonstrating improved prognostic accuracy. Notably, MELD 3.0 offers enhanced prediction of long-term mortality. In contrast, the Freiburg Index of Post-TIPS Survival (FIPS) has become a valuable tool for short-term mortality prediction. Additional models, including the Bilirubin-Platelet (Bili-PLT) score, offer further refinement. At the same time, the role of sarcopenia has gained attention as an independent and synergistic predictor of poor outcomes, especially when combined with MELD-based scores. Beyond mortality, this review explores the multifactorial pathophysiology of post-TIPS complications such as hepatic encephalopathy, liver failure, and right heart dysfunction that can cause significant morbidity. These outcomes are influenced by a spectrum of patient-related and procedural factors. Novel predictive approaches-encompassing clinical, radiological, and machine learning-based models-are being developed to better anticipate these risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"28 3","pages":"101062"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Morbidity and Mortality After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement: A Review of Existing Models and Future Directions.\",\"authors\":\"Moaz M Choudhary, Aria Nazeri, Amro S Aldine, Ankit R Mehta, Girish Kumar, Manoj K Kathuria, Shannan R Tujios, Arjmand R Mufti, Sanjeeva P Kalva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tvir.2025.101062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a key therapeutic intervention in the management of portal hypertension and its complications, such as variceal bleeding, hepatic hydrothorax, and refractory ascites. TIPS has historically been used as a lifesaving measure or as a bridge to liver transplantation (LT). Despite its efficacy, creation of a TIPS can be associated with significant morbidity, particularly in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Complications include hepatic encephalopathy (HE), progressive liver dysfunction, and cardiovascular compromise. As such, accurate patient selection and risk stratification are essential to optimize clinical outcomes. This review synthesizes current evidence on predictive models for post-TIPS mortality. Traditional scoring systems such as the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) remain widely used, with newer iterations such as the MELD-Na and MELD 3.0 demonstrating improved prognostic accuracy. Notably, MELD 3.0 offers enhanced prediction of long-term mortality. In contrast, the Freiburg Index of Post-TIPS Survival (FIPS) has become a valuable tool for short-term mortality prediction. Additional models, including the Bilirubin-Platelet (Bili-PLT) score, offer further refinement. At the same time, the role of sarcopenia has gained attention as an independent and synergistic predictor of poor outcomes, especially when combined with MELD-based scores. Beyond mortality, this review explores the multifactorial pathophysiology of post-TIPS complications such as hepatic encephalopathy, liver failure, and right heart dysfunction that can cause significant morbidity. These outcomes are influenced by a spectrum of patient-related and procedural factors. Novel predictive approaches-encompassing clinical, radiological, and machine learning-based models-are being developed to better anticipate these risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"101062\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvir.2025.101062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvir.2025.101062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术(TIPS)是治疗门静脉高压及其并发症(如静脉曲张出血、肝性胸水和难治性腹水)的关键治疗干预手段。TIPS历来被用作挽救生命的措施或作为肝移植(LT)的桥梁。尽管其疗效显著,但TIPS的产生可能与显著的发病率相关,尤其是失代偿性肝硬化患者。并发症包括肝性脑病(HE)、进行性肝功能障碍和心血管损害。因此,准确的患者选择和风险分层对于优化临床结果至关重要。本综述综合了tips后死亡率预测模型的现有证据。传统的评分系统,如child - turcote - pugh (CTP)评分和终末期肝病模型(MELD)仍然被广泛使用,更新的版本,如MELD- na和MELD 3.0,显示出更高的预后准确性。值得注意的是,MELD 3.0提供了增强的长期死亡率预测。相比之下,tips后生存的弗莱堡指数(FIPS)已成为短期死亡率预测的宝贵工具。其他模型,包括胆红素-血小板(Bili-PLT)评分,提供了进一步的改进。与此同时,肌肉减少症作为不良预后的独立和协同预测因子的作用已引起人们的关注,特别是与基于meld的评分相结合时。除了死亡率,本综述还探讨了tips术后并发症的多因素病理生理学,如肝性脑病、肝功能衰竭和右心功能障碍,这些并发症可导致显著的发病率。这些结果受到一系列患者相关因素和程序因素的影响。新的预测方法——包括临床、放射学和基于机器学习的模型——正在开发中,以更好地预测这些风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Morbidity and Mortality After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement: A Review of Existing Models and Future Directions.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a key therapeutic intervention in the management of portal hypertension and its complications, such as variceal bleeding, hepatic hydrothorax, and refractory ascites. TIPS has historically been used as a lifesaving measure or as a bridge to liver transplantation (LT). Despite its efficacy, creation of a TIPS can be associated with significant morbidity, particularly in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Complications include hepatic encephalopathy (HE), progressive liver dysfunction, and cardiovascular compromise. As such, accurate patient selection and risk stratification are essential to optimize clinical outcomes. This review synthesizes current evidence on predictive models for post-TIPS mortality. Traditional scoring systems such as the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) remain widely used, with newer iterations such as the MELD-Na and MELD 3.0 demonstrating improved prognostic accuracy. Notably, MELD 3.0 offers enhanced prediction of long-term mortality. In contrast, the Freiburg Index of Post-TIPS Survival (FIPS) has become a valuable tool for short-term mortality prediction. Additional models, including the Bilirubin-Platelet (Bili-PLT) score, offer further refinement. At the same time, the role of sarcopenia has gained attention as an independent and synergistic predictor of poor outcomes, especially when combined with MELD-based scores. Beyond mortality, this review explores the multifactorial pathophysiology of post-TIPS complications such as hepatic encephalopathy, liver failure, and right heart dysfunction that can cause significant morbidity. These outcomes are influenced by a spectrum of patient-related and procedural factors. Novel predictive approaches-encompassing clinical, radiological, and machine learning-based models-are being developed to better anticipate these risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Interventional radiology is an area of clinical diagnosis and management that is highly technique-oriented. Therefore, the format of this quarterly journal, which combines the visual impact of an atlas with the currency of a journal, lends itself perfectly to presenting the topics. Each issue is guest edited by a leader in the field and is focused on a single clinical technique or problem. The presentation is enhanced by superb illustrations and descriptive narrative outlining the steps of a particular procedure. Interventional radiologists, neuroradiologists, vascular surgeons and neurosurgeons will find this a useful addition to the clinical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信