{"title":"改良盒块试验和针对性盒块试验在脑卒中患者中的效度和信度。","authors":"Lütfiye Akkurt, Cihan Caner Aksoy, Fatıma Yaman","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2545543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Box and Block Test (BBT) is commonly used to evaluate unilateral manual dexterity in patients with stroke. While the BBT is quick and simple to use, it causes large measurement variability because the administration is not standardized. In this study, we evaluated the validity and reliability of the modified BBT (mBBT) and a targeted BBT (tBBT) in patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Our participants were 50 patients with stroke. We evaluated the criterion validity of the mBBT and tBBT through its correlations with scores on the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity test (FMA-UE) and BBT. We analyzed the reliability with test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mBBT was strongly and positively correlated with the 9 HPT (<i>r</i> = 0.823), and strongly negatively correlated the BBT (<i>r</i> = -0.870) for the more-affected hand (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The tBBT was also strongly positively correlated with the 9 HPT (<i>r</i> = 0.913), and the BBT (<i>r</i> = -0.889) for the more-affected hand (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The mBBT was moderately positively correlated with the FMA-UE (<i>r</i> = -0.574), and the tBBT was moderately correlated with (<i>r</i> = -0.604) for the more-affected hand (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The ICCs for the mBBT and the tBBT ranged from 0.86 to 0.97 for the more-affected hand.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this sample, the mBBT and tBBT appeared to be valid and reliable for patients with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of modified box and block test and targeted box and block test in patients with stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Lütfiye Akkurt, Cihan Caner Aksoy, Fatıma Yaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2025.2545543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Box and Block Test (BBT) is commonly used to evaluate unilateral manual dexterity in patients with stroke. While the BBT is quick and simple to use, it causes large measurement variability because the administration is not standardized. In this study, we evaluated the validity and reliability of the modified BBT (mBBT) and a targeted BBT (tBBT) in patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Our participants were 50 patients with stroke. We evaluated the criterion validity of the mBBT and tBBT through its correlations with scores on the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity test (FMA-UE) and BBT. We analyzed the reliability with test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mBBT was strongly and positively correlated with the 9 HPT (<i>r</i> = 0.823), and strongly negatively correlated the BBT (<i>r</i> = -0.870) for the more-affected hand (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The tBBT was also strongly positively correlated with the 9 HPT (<i>r</i> = 0.913), and the BBT (<i>r</i> = -0.889) for the more-affected hand (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The mBBT was moderately positively correlated with the FMA-UE (<i>r</i> = -0.574), and the tBBT was moderately correlated with (<i>r</i> = -0.604) for the more-affected hand (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The ICCs for the mBBT and the tBBT ranged from 0.86 to 0.97 for the more-affected hand.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this sample, the mBBT and tBBT appeared to be valid and reliable for patients with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2545543\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2545543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validity and reliability of modified box and block test and targeted box and block test in patients with stroke.
Introduction: The Box and Block Test (BBT) is commonly used to evaluate unilateral manual dexterity in patients with stroke. While the BBT is quick and simple to use, it causes large measurement variability because the administration is not standardized. In this study, we evaluated the validity and reliability of the modified BBT (mBBT) and a targeted BBT (tBBT) in patients with stroke.
Method: Our participants were 50 patients with stroke. We evaluated the criterion validity of the mBBT and tBBT through its correlations with scores on the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity test (FMA-UE) and BBT. We analyzed the reliability with test-retest reliability.
Results: The mBBT was strongly and positively correlated with the 9 HPT (r = 0.823), and strongly negatively correlated the BBT (r = -0.870) for the more-affected hand (p < 0.001). The tBBT was also strongly positively correlated with the 9 HPT (r = 0.913), and the BBT (r = -0.889) for the more-affected hand (p < 0.001). The mBBT was moderately positively correlated with the FMA-UE (r = -0.574), and the tBBT was moderately correlated with (r = -0.604) for the more-affected hand (p < 0.001). The ICCs for the mBBT and the tBBT ranged from 0.86 to 0.97 for the more-affected hand.
Conclusion: In this sample, the mBBT and tBBT appeared to be valid and reliable for patients with stroke.
期刊介绍：
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
