{"title":"吡非尼酮与尼达尼布治疗肺纤维化的疗效观察系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yiting Qiu, Wei Ye","doi":"10.4103/atm.atm_132_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This updated systematic review and meta-analysis pooled the results of previous clinical trials assessing the effects of pirfenidone and nintedanib on patients with pulmonary fibrosis. Scopus, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched from the inception to April 12, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials measuring the effect of pirfenidone and nintedanib on pulmonary fibrosis. Because of high methodological heterogeneity, we utilized a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird) to perform this meta-analysis. Finally, 18 articles with 20 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. We found that compared to placebo, treatment with the two antifibrotic drugs increased forced vital capacity (FVC) predicted (weighted mean difference [WMD] 3.12%, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.41, 4.82], <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 53.30%), FVC volume (WMD 87.44 ml, 95% CI [59.32, 115.57], <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 99.4%), and the distance walked in the 6-minute walk test (WMD 24.63 m, 95% CI [16.05, 33.22], <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.00%). However, compared to placebo, treatment with the two antifibrotic drugs did not significantly change the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (WMD 1.38 ml/min/mmHg, 95% CI [-9.42, 12.18], <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.00%). Therapeutic benefits were observed for both pirfenidone and nintedanib and for both idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF. Pirfenidone and nintedanib can improve lung function and functional capacity in patients with different types of pulmonary fibrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":"20 3","pages":"145-152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic efficacy of pirfenidone and nintedanib in pulmonary fibrosis; a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yiting Qiu, Wei Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/atm.atm_132_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This updated systematic review and meta-analysis pooled the results of previous clinical trials assessing the effects of pirfenidone and nintedanib on patients with pulmonary fibrosis. Scopus, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched from the inception to April 12, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials measuring the effect of pirfenidone and nintedanib on pulmonary fibrosis. Because of high methodological heterogeneity, we utilized a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird) to perform this meta-analysis. Finally, 18 articles with 20 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. We found that compared to placebo, treatment with the two antifibrotic drugs increased forced vital capacity (FVC) predicted (weighted mean difference [WMD] 3.12%, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.41, 4.82], <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 53.30%), FVC volume (WMD 87.44 ml, 95% CI [59.32, 115.57], <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 99.4%), and the distance walked in the 6-minute walk test (WMD 24.63 m, 95% CI [16.05, 33.22], <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.00%). However, compared to placebo, treatment with the two antifibrotic drugs did not significantly change the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (WMD 1.38 ml/min/mmHg, 95% CI [-9.42, 12.18], <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.00%). Therapeutic benefits were observed for both pirfenidone and nintedanib and for both idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF. Pirfenidone and nintedanib can improve lung function and functional capacity in patients with different types of pulmonary fibrosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"145-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333965/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_132_25\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_132_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项更新的系统综述和荟萃分析汇集了先前评估吡非尼酮和尼达尼布对肺纤维化患者影响的临床试验的结果。检索Scopus、Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和Web of Science,从开始到2025年4月12日,以确定测量吡非尼酮和尼达尼布对肺纤维化影响的随机对照试验。由于方法异质性高,我们采用随机效应模型(dersimonan - laird)进行meta分析。最后,本meta分析纳入了18篇文章和20项随机对照试验。我们发现,与安慰剂相比,两种抗纤维化药物治疗可增加强迫肺活量(FVC)(加权平均差[WMD] 3.12%, 95%可信区间[CI] [1.41, 4.82], i2 = 53.30%), FVC体积(WMD 87.44 ml, 95% CI [59.32, 115.57], i2 = 99.4%), 6分钟步行测试中步行距离(WMD 24.63 m, 95% CI [16.05, 33.22], i2 = 0.00%)。然而,与安慰剂相比,两种抗纤维化药物治疗并没有显著改变肺对一氧化碳的弥散能力(WMD 1.38 ml/min/mmHg, 95% CI [-9.42, 12.18], I 2 = 0.00%)。观察到吡非尼酮和尼达尼布以及特发性肺纤维化(IPF)和非IPF的治疗效果。吡非尼酮和尼达尼布可改善不同类型肺纤维化患者的肺功能和功能容量。
Therapeutic efficacy of pirfenidone and nintedanib in pulmonary fibrosis; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
This updated systematic review and meta-analysis pooled the results of previous clinical trials assessing the effects of pirfenidone and nintedanib on patients with pulmonary fibrosis. Scopus, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched from the inception to April 12, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials measuring the effect of pirfenidone and nintedanib on pulmonary fibrosis. Because of high methodological heterogeneity, we utilized a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird) to perform this meta-analysis. Finally, 18 articles with 20 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. We found that compared to placebo, treatment with the two antifibrotic drugs increased forced vital capacity (FVC) predicted (weighted mean difference [WMD] 3.12%, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.41, 4.82], I2 = 53.30%), FVC volume (WMD 87.44 ml, 95% CI [59.32, 115.57], I2 = 99.4%), and the distance walked in the 6-minute walk test (WMD 24.63 m, 95% CI [16.05, 33.22], I2 = 0.00%). However, compared to placebo, treatment with the two antifibrotic drugs did not significantly change the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (WMD 1.38 ml/min/mmHg, 95% CI [-9.42, 12.18], I2 = 0.00%). Therapeutic benefits were observed for both pirfenidone and nintedanib and for both idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF. Pirfenidone and nintedanib can improve lung function and functional capacity in patients with different types of pulmonary fibrosis.
期刊介绍:
The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.