一氧化氮和手术体位对气管内管袖口压力、术后声音嘶哑和喉咙痛的影响;一项双盲临床试验。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Annals of Thoracic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-23 DOI:10.4103/atm.atm_204_24
Gholamhassann Chaichi-Nosrati, Esmail Moshiri, Hesameddin Modir, Alireza Mohammadi
{"title":"一氧化氮和手术体位对气管内管袖口压力、术后声音嘶哑和喉咙痛的影响;一项双盲临床试验。","authors":"Gholamhassann Chaichi-Nosrati, Esmail Moshiri, Hesameddin Modir, Alireza Mohammadi","doi":"10.4103/atm.atm_204_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and surgical position on endotracheal tube cuff (ETC) pressure, hoarseness, and sore throat (ST) after surgery under general anesthesia (GA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 212 candidates for surgery under GA. They were randomly allocated to four groups, namely a supine position group (Group S), a prone position group (Group P), a supine position and N<sub>2</sub>O group (Group SN), and a prone position and N<sub>2</sub>O group (Group PN). ST and hoarseness were assessed at recovery and 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery using a visual analog scale and a mild-to-severe scoring system, respectively. ETC pressure was also measured at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after surgery onset using an Ambu cuff pressure gauge. Moreover, the mean intraoperative propofol concentration was documented. The data were analyzed at a significance level of <0.05 and using the SPSS software (version 20.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference among groups regarding surgery duration (<i>P</i> = 0.998), whereas ST and ETC pressure in Groups S and P were significantly less than Groups SN and PN (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Moreover, ST and ETC pressure in Group S were significantly less than the other groups (<i>P</i> = 0.001). None of the participants in Groups S and P had hoarseness, and there was a significant difference among the four groups regarding the frequency of hoarseness (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Moreover, none of the participants in Group SN needed postoperative analgesic, and there was no significant difference between Groups S and <i>P</i> regarding postoperative analgesic use (<i>P</i> = 0.998). Intraoperative propofol use in Group SN was significantly less than the other groups (<i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ETC pressure should periodically be monitored and adjusted during lengthy surgeries in prone position and N<sub>2</sub>O anesthesia to prevent postoperative ST and hoarseness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":"20 3","pages":"153-159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of nitrous oxide and surgical position on endotracheal tube cuff pressure, post operative hoarseness, and sore throat; a double-blind clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Gholamhassann Chaichi-Nosrati, Esmail Moshiri, Hesameddin Modir, Alireza Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/atm.atm_204_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and surgical position on endotracheal tube cuff (ETC) pressure, hoarseness, and sore throat (ST) after surgery under general anesthesia (GA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 212 candidates for surgery under GA. They were randomly allocated to four groups, namely a supine position group (Group S), a prone position group (Group P), a supine position and N<sub>2</sub>O group (Group SN), and a prone position and N<sub>2</sub>O group (Group PN). ST and hoarseness were assessed at recovery and 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery using a visual analog scale and a mild-to-severe scoring system, respectively. ETC pressure was also measured at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after surgery onset using an Ambu cuff pressure gauge. Moreover, the mean intraoperative propofol concentration was documented. The data were analyzed at a significance level of <0.05 and using the SPSS software (version 20.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference among groups regarding surgery duration (<i>P</i> = 0.998), whereas ST and ETC pressure in Groups S and P were significantly less than Groups SN and PN (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Moreover, ST and ETC pressure in Group S were significantly less than the other groups (<i>P</i> = 0.001). None of the participants in Groups S and P had hoarseness, and there was a significant difference among the four groups regarding the frequency of hoarseness (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Moreover, none of the participants in Group SN needed postoperative analgesic, and there was no significant difference between Groups S and <i>P</i> regarding postoperative analgesic use (<i>P</i> = 0.998). Intraoperative propofol use in Group SN was significantly less than the other groups (<i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ETC pressure should periodically be monitored and adjusted during lengthy surgeries in prone position and N<sub>2</sub>O anesthesia to prevent postoperative ST and hoarseness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"153-159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333963/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_204_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_204_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是评估一氧化二氮(N2O)和手术体位对全麻(GA)手术后气管内套管(ETC)压力、声音嘶哑和喉咙痛(ST)的影响。方法:本双盲临床试验对212例GA手术候选者进行研究。随机分为4组:仰卧位组(S组)、俯卧位组(P组)、仰卧位加N2O组(SN组)、俯卧位加N2O组(PN组)。分别在术后恢复和术后2、4、8、12和24小时使用视觉模拟量表和轻度至重度评分系统评估ST和沙哑。在手术开始后15、30、60、90和120分钟使用Ambu袖带压力表测量ETC血压。此外,记录了术中异丙酚的平均浓度。结果:组间手术时间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.998), S、P组ST、ETC压力显著小于SN、PN组(P = 0.001)。S组ST、ETC压明显低于其他组(P = 0.001)。S组和P组的参与者均无声音嘶哑,四组之间声音嘶哑的频率有显著差异(P = 0.001)。SN组患者术后均无需使用镇痛药,S组与P组术后镇痛药使用差异无统计学意义(P = 0.998)。SN组术中异丙酚使用明显少于其他组(P = 0.001)。结论:在长时间俯卧位和N2O麻醉下,应定期监测和调整ETC压力,以防止术后ST和沙哑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of nitrous oxide and surgical position on endotracheal tube cuff pressure, post operative hoarseness, and sore throat; a double-blind clinical trial.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of nitrous oxide (N2O) and surgical position on endotracheal tube cuff (ETC) pressure, hoarseness, and sore throat (ST) after surgery under general anesthesia (GA).

Methods: This double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 212 candidates for surgery under GA. They were randomly allocated to four groups, namely a supine position group (Group S), a prone position group (Group P), a supine position and N2O group (Group SN), and a prone position and N2O group (Group PN). ST and hoarseness were assessed at recovery and 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery using a visual analog scale and a mild-to-severe scoring system, respectively. ETC pressure was also measured at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after surgery onset using an Ambu cuff pressure gauge. Moreover, the mean intraoperative propofol concentration was documented. The data were analyzed at a significance level of <0.05 and using the SPSS software (version 20.0).

Results: There was no significant difference among groups regarding surgery duration (P = 0.998), whereas ST and ETC pressure in Groups S and P were significantly less than Groups SN and PN (P = 0.001). Moreover, ST and ETC pressure in Group S were significantly less than the other groups (P = 0.001). None of the participants in Groups S and P had hoarseness, and there was a significant difference among the four groups regarding the frequency of hoarseness (P = 0.001). Moreover, none of the participants in Group SN needed postoperative analgesic, and there was no significant difference between Groups S and P regarding postoperative analgesic use (P = 0.998). Intraoperative propofol use in Group SN was significantly less than the other groups (P = 0.001).

Conclusion: ETC pressure should periodically be monitored and adjusted during lengthy surgeries in prone position and N2O anesthesia to prevent postoperative ST and hoarseness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Annals of Thoracic Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信