在肺癌筛查中引导共同决策:临床医生之间的障碍、培训和转诊倾向。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Patient Education and Counseling Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2025.109303
Lisa Carter-Bawa, Jennifer Elston Lafata, James E Slaven, Patrick O Monahan, Ana Guadalupe Vielma, Karen J Wernli, Susan Brandzel, Hongyuan Gao, Susan M Rawl
{"title":"在肺癌筛查中引导共同决策:临床医生之间的障碍、培训和转诊倾向。","authors":"Lisa Carter-Bawa, Jennifer Elston Lafata, James E Slaven, Patrick O Monahan, Ana Guadalupe Vielma, Karen J Wernli, Susan Brandzel, Hongyuan Gao, Susan M Rawl","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2025.109303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Shared decision-making (SDM) is critical in lung cancer screening (LCS), enabling clinicians to guide patients through complex benefit-risk discussions. Despite its endorsement by professional organizations and its Medicare reimbursement requirement, SDM implementation in clinical practice remains inconsistent. This cross-sectional study evaluated factors influencing clinician knowledge, attitudes, and referral behaviors regarding LCS within a decentralized screening program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 125 primary care clinicians (PCCs) in a large integrated health system, linking responses to electronic health record data to assess LCS referral propensity. Clinicians reported perceived barriers to SDM, attitudes toward SDM and LCS, and knowledge via clinical vignettes. Multivariable analyses identified key predictors of attitudes and behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed that perceived barriers to SDM, particularly time burden, significantly influenced attitudes toward LCS (β = -0.334, p < 0.001) and referral propensity (β = -0.305, p = 0.0005). Formal training in SDM for LCS was positively associated with favorable SDM attitudes (β = 0.035, p = 0.0248), emphasizing the potential of targeted interventions. Time burden emerged as a critical determinant of perceived barriers (β = 0.728, p < 0.001), highlighting the need for systemic and educational solutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results underscore the importance of reducing SDM-related time burdens and enhancing training to improve clinician engagement and screening outcomes. Innovative strategies, such as patient-tailored pre-visit education and team-based care models, could mitigate barriers and promote more effective SDM implementation. Future research should explore longitudinal and multi-system analyses to refine interventions and optimize LCS processes.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>By addressing systemic and individual barriers, health systems can enhance SDM efficacy, increasing LCS uptake and improving care for screening-eligible populations. This study offers actionable insights for advancing patient-centered approaches in LCS and broader preventive health initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"140 ","pages":"109303"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating shared decision-making in lung cancer screening: Insights into barriers, training, and referral propensity among clinicians.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Carter-Bawa, Jennifer Elston Lafata, James E Slaven, Patrick O Monahan, Ana Guadalupe Vielma, Karen J Wernli, Susan Brandzel, Hongyuan Gao, Susan M Rawl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pec.2025.109303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Shared decision-making (SDM) is critical in lung cancer screening (LCS), enabling clinicians to guide patients through complex benefit-risk discussions. Despite its endorsement by professional organizations and its Medicare reimbursement requirement, SDM implementation in clinical practice remains inconsistent. This cross-sectional study evaluated factors influencing clinician knowledge, attitudes, and referral behaviors regarding LCS within a decentralized screening program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 125 primary care clinicians (PCCs) in a large integrated health system, linking responses to electronic health record data to assess LCS referral propensity. Clinicians reported perceived barriers to SDM, attitudes toward SDM and LCS, and knowledge via clinical vignettes. Multivariable analyses identified key predictors of attitudes and behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed that perceived barriers to SDM, particularly time burden, significantly influenced attitudes toward LCS (β = -0.334, p < 0.001) and referral propensity (β = -0.305, p = 0.0005). Formal training in SDM for LCS was positively associated with favorable SDM attitudes (β = 0.035, p = 0.0248), emphasizing the potential of targeted interventions. Time burden emerged as a critical determinant of perceived barriers (β = 0.728, p < 0.001), highlighting the need for systemic and educational solutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results underscore the importance of reducing SDM-related time burdens and enhancing training to improve clinician engagement and screening outcomes. Innovative strategies, such as patient-tailored pre-visit education and team-based care models, could mitigate barriers and promote more effective SDM implementation. Future research should explore longitudinal and multi-system analyses to refine interventions and optimize LCS processes.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>By addressing systemic and individual barriers, health systems can enhance SDM efficacy, increasing LCS uptake and improving care for screening-eligible populations. This study offers actionable insights for advancing patient-centered approaches in LCS and broader preventive health initiatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"volume\":\"140 \",\"pages\":\"109303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2025.109303\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2025.109303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:共同决策(SDM)在肺癌筛查(LCS)中至关重要,使临床医生能够通过复杂的利益-风险讨论指导患者。尽管SDM得到了专业组织的认可和医疗保险报销要求,但临床实践中SDM的实施仍然不一致。本横断面研究评估了在分散筛查项目中影响临床医生对LCS的知识、态度和转诊行为的因素。方法:我们调查了一个大型综合卫生系统中的125名初级保健临床医生(PCCs),将他们的反应与电子健康记录数据联系起来,以评估LCS转诊倾向。临床医生报告了SDM的感知障碍,对SDM和LCS的态度,以及通过临床小插曲的知识。多变量分析确定了态度和行为的关键预测因素。结果:研究结果显示,对SDM的感知障碍,特别是时间负担,显著影响了对LCS的态度(β = -0.334, p )。结论:这些结果强调了减少SDM相关的时间负担和加强培训以提高临床医生参与度和筛查结果的重要性。创新策略,如为患者量身定制的就诊前教育和基于团队的护理模式,可以减轻障碍,促进更有效的SDM实施。未来的研究应探索纵向和多系统分析,以完善干预措施和优化LCS过程。实践意义:通过解决系统和个人障碍,卫生系统可以提高可持续发展机制的有效性,增加LCS的吸收,并改善对符合筛查条件人群的护理。本研究为推进LCS中以患者为中心的方法和更广泛的预防健康倡议提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating shared decision-making in lung cancer screening: Insights into barriers, training, and referral propensity among clinicians.

Objectives: Shared decision-making (SDM) is critical in lung cancer screening (LCS), enabling clinicians to guide patients through complex benefit-risk discussions. Despite its endorsement by professional organizations and its Medicare reimbursement requirement, SDM implementation in clinical practice remains inconsistent. This cross-sectional study evaluated factors influencing clinician knowledge, attitudes, and referral behaviors regarding LCS within a decentralized screening program.

Methods: We surveyed 125 primary care clinicians (PCCs) in a large integrated health system, linking responses to electronic health record data to assess LCS referral propensity. Clinicians reported perceived barriers to SDM, attitudes toward SDM and LCS, and knowledge via clinical vignettes. Multivariable analyses identified key predictors of attitudes and behaviors.

Results: Findings revealed that perceived barriers to SDM, particularly time burden, significantly influenced attitudes toward LCS (β = -0.334, p < 0.001) and referral propensity (β = -0.305, p = 0.0005). Formal training in SDM for LCS was positively associated with favorable SDM attitudes (β = 0.035, p = 0.0248), emphasizing the potential of targeted interventions. Time burden emerged as a critical determinant of perceived barriers (β = 0.728, p < 0.001), highlighting the need for systemic and educational solutions.

Conclusions: These results underscore the importance of reducing SDM-related time burdens and enhancing training to improve clinician engagement and screening outcomes. Innovative strategies, such as patient-tailored pre-visit education and team-based care models, could mitigate barriers and promote more effective SDM implementation. Future research should explore longitudinal and multi-system analyses to refine interventions and optimize LCS processes.

Practice implications: By addressing systemic and individual barriers, health systems can enhance SDM efficacy, increasing LCS uptake and improving care for screening-eligible populations. This study offers actionable insights for advancing patient-centered approaches in LCS and broader preventive health initiatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信