生育辩论,规避追求:土耳其的生殖管理和配子捐赠。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-30 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118464
Burcu Mutlu
{"title":"生育辩论,规避追求:土耳其的生殖管理和配子捐赠。","authors":"Burcu Mutlu","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the transformations of reproductive politics in Turkey under the AKP governments since 2002, shaped by the intersection of neoconservatism, nationalism, familialism, and pronatalism. Focusing on public and media discourses surrounding assisted reproduction, it analyzes the controversy sparked by single celebrities' use of foreign sperm banks and the subsequent 2010 ban on transnational gamete donation. By linking the concept of reproductive governance with debates over a perceived crisis of masculinity, the article argues that this ban marks an early manifestation of a broader national masculinist restoration. It illustrates how gender, reproduction, and kinship have been reconfigured within increasingly religious, ethnonationalist and patriarchal frameworks. Through an analysis of media narratives, the article demonstrates how certain reproductive practices, particularly single women's pursuit of motherhood, are hypervisibilized and stigmatized, while other forms of assisted reproduction are obscured. These discursive strategies serve not only to discipline reproductive behaviors, but also to reinforce gendered hierarchies and normative family structures under the guise of moral, social, and national imperatives. Ultimately, the article reveals how reproductive politics in Turkey, and in similar contexts globally, are increasingly governed by authoritarian strategies of moralization, control, and criminalization. These strategies are mobilized in response to perceived threats to the national, moral, and social order, whether posed by shifting gender and familial norms, demographic anxieties, or assertions of reproductive autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"383 ","pages":"118464"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fertile debates, circumventive pursuits: Reproductive governance and gamete donation in Turkey.\",\"authors\":\"Burcu Mutlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article examines the transformations of reproductive politics in Turkey under the AKP governments since 2002, shaped by the intersection of neoconservatism, nationalism, familialism, and pronatalism. Focusing on public and media discourses surrounding assisted reproduction, it analyzes the controversy sparked by single celebrities' use of foreign sperm banks and the subsequent 2010 ban on transnational gamete donation. By linking the concept of reproductive governance with debates over a perceived crisis of masculinity, the article argues that this ban marks an early manifestation of a broader national masculinist restoration. It illustrates how gender, reproduction, and kinship have been reconfigured within increasingly religious, ethnonationalist and patriarchal frameworks. Through an analysis of media narratives, the article demonstrates how certain reproductive practices, particularly single women's pursuit of motherhood, are hypervisibilized and stigmatized, while other forms of assisted reproduction are obscured. These discursive strategies serve not only to discipline reproductive behaviors, but also to reinforce gendered hierarchies and normative family structures under the guise of moral, social, and national imperatives. Ultimately, the article reveals how reproductive politics in Turkey, and in similar contexts globally, are increasingly governed by authoritarian strategies of moralization, control, and criminalization. These strategies are mobilized in response to perceived threats to the national, moral, and social order, whether posed by shifting gender and familial norms, demographic anxieties, or assertions of reproductive autonomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"383 \",\"pages\":\"118464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118464\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了自2002年以来,在新保守主义、民族主义、熟悉主义和生育主义的交叉影响下,土耳其在正义与发展党政府领导下的生育政治的转变。本书聚焦于公众和媒体对辅助生殖的讨论,分析了单身名人使用外国精子库以及随后2010年禁止跨国配子捐赠引发的争议。通过将生殖管理的概念与对男性气质危机的争论联系起来,文章认为,这一禁令标志着更广泛的国家男性主义恢复的早期表现。它说明了性别、生殖和亲属关系是如何在日益宗教化、民族主义和父权制的框架中被重新配置的。通过对媒体叙事的分析,本文展示了某些生殖实践,特别是单身女性对母性的追求,是如何被过度关注和污名化的,而其他形式的辅助生殖则是模糊的。这些话语策略不仅可以约束生殖行为,还可以在道德、社会和国家要求的幌子下强化性别等级和规范的家庭结构。最后,这篇文章揭示了土耳其的生殖政治,以及在全球类似的背景下,如何越来越多地受到道德、控制和刑事化的威权策略的支配。这些策略是为了应对对国家、道德和社会秩序的威胁而动员起来的,这些威胁可能是由性别和家庭规范的转变、人口焦虑或生殖自主的主张造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fertile debates, circumventive pursuits: Reproductive governance and gamete donation in Turkey.

This article examines the transformations of reproductive politics in Turkey under the AKP governments since 2002, shaped by the intersection of neoconservatism, nationalism, familialism, and pronatalism. Focusing on public and media discourses surrounding assisted reproduction, it analyzes the controversy sparked by single celebrities' use of foreign sperm banks and the subsequent 2010 ban on transnational gamete donation. By linking the concept of reproductive governance with debates over a perceived crisis of masculinity, the article argues that this ban marks an early manifestation of a broader national masculinist restoration. It illustrates how gender, reproduction, and kinship have been reconfigured within increasingly religious, ethnonationalist and patriarchal frameworks. Through an analysis of media narratives, the article demonstrates how certain reproductive practices, particularly single women's pursuit of motherhood, are hypervisibilized and stigmatized, while other forms of assisted reproduction are obscured. These discursive strategies serve not only to discipline reproductive behaviors, but also to reinforce gendered hierarchies and normative family structures under the guise of moral, social, and national imperatives. Ultimately, the article reveals how reproductive politics in Turkey, and in similar contexts globally, are increasingly governed by authoritarian strategies of moralization, control, and criminalization. These strategies are mobilized in response to perceived threats to the national, moral, and social order, whether posed by shifting gender and familial norms, demographic anxieties, or assertions of reproductive autonomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信