伤害回避和不完整性作为强迫症的动机维度:与临床和人口学特征的关联。

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s10608-024-10561-2
Heather S Martin, Martha J Falkenstein, Jacob A Nota, Jennie M Kuckertz
{"title":"伤害回避和不完整性作为强迫症的动机维度:与临床和人口学特征的关联。","authors":"Heather S Martin, Martha J Falkenstein, Jacob A Nota, Jennie M Kuckertz","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10561-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Content-based models, which focus on observable symptom content, have dominated much of the literature on heterogeneity in OCD. However, alternate models emphasize the motivations underlying different symptom presentations, including harm avoidance (HA) and incompleteness (INC). To promote understanding of these motivations, we examined their associations with various content-based symptom dimensions, obsessive belief patterns, and other clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined a large set of demographic and clinical characteristics and their associations with HA and/or INC among individuals (<i>N</i> = 218) receiving treatment for OCD and related disorders in a partial hospital/residential program. We also examined the extent to which HA and INC mapped onto dimensions in prevailing symptom content and obsessive belief models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that women reported more HA than men, and INC was associated with an earlier age of onset. HA and INC were not differentially associated with sexual orientation, self-view, quality of life, depression, or suicidality. HA and INC mapped onto symptom content and obsessive belief models in some, but not all the ways we expected. Notably, contamination/washing in our sample was associated with INC, but not HA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding motivations underlying OCD symptoms may lead to personalized care and improvement in treatment outcomes. We suggest that future research should continue to examine the motivational model, as well as ways in which presentations of each motivation may differ.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":"49 4","pages":"795-806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harm Avoidance and Incompleteness as Motivational Dimensions of OCD: Associations with Clinical and Demographic Traits.\",\"authors\":\"Heather S Martin, Martha J Falkenstein, Jacob A Nota, Jennie M Kuckertz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10608-024-10561-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Content-based models, which focus on observable symptom content, have dominated much of the literature on heterogeneity in OCD. However, alternate models emphasize the motivations underlying different symptom presentations, including harm avoidance (HA) and incompleteness (INC). To promote understanding of these motivations, we examined their associations with various content-based symptom dimensions, obsessive belief patterns, and other clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined a large set of demographic and clinical characteristics and their associations with HA and/or INC among individuals (<i>N</i> = 218) receiving treatment for OCD and related disorders in a partial hospital/residential program. We also examined the extent to which HA and INC mapped onto dimensions in prevailing symptom content and obsessive belief models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that women reported more HA than men, and INC was associated with an earlier age of onset. HA and INC were not differentially associated with sexual orientation, self-view, quality of life, depression, or suicidality. HA and INC mapped onto symptom content and obsessive belief models in some, but not all the ways we expected. Notably, contamination/washing in our sample was associated with INC, but not HA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding motivations underlying OCD symptoms may lead to personalized care and improvement in treatment outcomes. We suggest that future research should continue to examine the motivational model, as well as ways in which presentations of each motivation may differ.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Therapy and Research\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"795-806\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333658/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Therapy and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10561-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10561-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基于内容的模型关注可观察到的症状内容,在强迫症异质性的研究中占据主导地位。然而,其他模型强调不同症状表现背后的动机,包括伤害避免(HA)和不完整性(INC)。为了促进对这些动机的理解,我们研究了它们与各种基于内容的症状维度、强迫信念模式和其他临床特征的关联。方法:我们检查了大量的人口统计学和临床特征,以及它们与HA和/或INC之间的关系,这些个体(N = 218)在部分医院/住院项目中接受强迫症和相关疾病治疗。我们还研究了HA和INC在流行症状内容和强迫信念模型中映射到维度的程度。结果:结果显示,女性报告的HA多于男性,INC与发病年龄较早有关。HA和INC与性取向、自我观、生活质量、抑郁或自杀倾向没有差异。HA和INC以某种方式映射到症状内容和强迫信念模型上,但不是我们所期望的全部方式。值得注意的是,我们样品中的污染/洗涤与INC有关,而与HA无关。结论:了解强迫症症状背后的动机可能会导致个性化护理和治疗效果的改善。我们建议未来的研究应该继续检查动机模型,以及每种动机的表现可能不同的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harm Avoidance and Incompleteness as Motivational Dimensions of OCD: Associations with Clinical and Demographic Traits.

Purpose: Content-based models, which focus on observable symptom content, have dominated much of the literature on heterogeneity in OCD. However, alternate models emphasize the motivations underlying different symptom presentations, including harm avoidance (HA) and incompleteness (INC). To promote understanding of these motivations, we examined their associations with various content-based symptom dimensions, obsessive belief patterns, and other clinical characteristics.

Methods: We examined a large set of demographic and clinical characteristics and their associations with HA and/or INC among individuals (N = 218) receiving treatment for OCD and related disorders in a partial hospital/residential program. We also examined the extent to which HA and INC mapped onto dimensions in prevailing symptom content and obsessive belief models.

Results: Results showed that women reported more HA than men, and INC was associated with an earlier age of onset. HA and INC were not differentially associated with sexual orientation, self-view, quality of life, depression, or suicidality. HA and INC mapped onto symptom content and obsessive belief models in some, but not all the ways we expected. Notably, contamination/washing in our sample was associated with INC, but not HA.

Conclusions: Understanding motivations underlying OCD symptoms may lead to personalized care and improvement in treatment outcomes. We suggest that future research should continue to examine the motivational model, as well as ways in which presentations of each motivation may differ.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Cognitive Therapy and Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Cognitive Therapy and Research (COTR) focuses on the investigation of cognitive processes in human adaptation and adjustment and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). It is an interdisciplinary journal welcoming submissions from diverse areas of psychology, including cognitive, clinical, developmental, experimental, personality, social, learning, affective neuroscience, emotion research, therapy mechanism, and pharmacotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信