肱二头肌肌腱长头半脱位导致肩胛下肌部分撕裂进展的手臂位置增加:尸体生物力学研究。

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.4055/cios24233
Su Cheol Kim, Seung Gyoon Kang, Michelle H McGarry, Thay Q Lee, Jae Chul Yoo
{"title":"肱二头肌肌腱长头半脱位导致肩胛下肌部分撕裂进展的手臂位置增加:尸体生物力学研究。","authors":"Su Cheol Kim, Seung Gyoon Kang, Michelle H McGarry, Thay Q Lee, Jae Chul Yoo","doi":"10.4055/cios24233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgroud: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the differences in long head of biceps (LHB) motion between the normal and subscapularis intrasubstance partial tear conditions and identify the arm positions that exhibit the most significant LHB motion differences using a cadaveric biomechanical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The LHB tendons of 6 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (2 men and 4 women; mean age, 68.4 ± 2.3 years; range, 65-71 years) were marked with metal beads and mounted in a custom-made shoulder testing system. Data for arm positions at 20° or 60° of forward flexion or abduction, with neutral rotation and maximum internal and external rotation with a torque of 1.5 N·m, were collected. Considering the scapulohumeral rhythm, 20° or 60° forward flexion or abduction in a cadaveric shoulder corresponds to 30° or 90° shoulder elevation <i>in vivo</i> . Mediolateral (subluxation) and inferosuperior (excursion) LHB motions were measured using a 3-dimensional digitizer, and the differences between normal and subscapularis partial tear conditions were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the LHB mediolateral motion difference was the highest during 60° forward flexion with neutral rotation (1.2 ± 0.4, <i>p</i> = 0.042), 20° forward flexion with neutral rotation (0.9 ± 0.3, <i>p</i> = 0.024) and 60° abduction with maximum external rotation (0.9 ± 0.3, <i>p</i> = 0.036) also demonstrated high mediolateral LHB motion difference between the normal and subscapularis partial tear conditions. In contrast, the LHB inferosuperior motion difference was the highest during 20° forward flexion with neutral rotation (0.7 ± 0.3, <i>p</i> = 0.045) between the normal and subscapularis partial tear conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Upon comparing normal and subscapularis partial tear conditions in this cadaveric study, high pathological movements of the LHB were observed during arm forward flexion with neutral rotation and abduction with external rotation. Repetitive activity in these arm positions could aggravate the condition in a partial subscapularis tear.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 4","pages":"649-656"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arm Position with Increased Risk of Partial Subscapularis Tear Progression Owing to Subluxation of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon: Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Su Cheol Kim, Seung Gyoon Kang, Michelle H McGarry, Thay Q Lee, Jae Chul Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.4055/cios24233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgroud: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the differences in long head of biceps (LHB) motion between the normal and subscapularis intrasubstance partial tear conditions and identify the arm positions that exhibit the most significant LHB motion differences using a cadaveric biomechanical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The LHB tendons of 6 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (2 men and 4 women; mean age, 68.4 ± 2.3 years; range, 65-71 years) were marked with metal beads and mounted in a custom-made shoulder testing system. Data for arm positions at 20° or 60° of forward flexion or abduction, with neutral rotation and maximum internal and external rotation with a torque of 1.5 N·m, were collected. Considering the scapulohumeral rhythm, 20° or 60° forward flexion or abduction in a cadaveric shoulder corresponds to 30° or 90° shoulder elevation <i>in vivo</i> . Mediolateral (subluxation) and inferosuperior (excursion) LHB motions were measured using a 3-dimensional digitizer, and the differences between normal and subscapularis partial tear conditions were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the LHB mediolateral motion difference was the highest during 60° forward flexion with neutral rotation (1.2 ± 0.4, <i>p</i> = 0.042), 20° forward flexion with neutral rotation (0.9 ± 0.3, <i>p</i> = 0.024) and 60° abduction with maximum external rotation (0.9 ± 0.3, <i>p</i> = 0.036) also demonstrated high mediolateral LHB motion difference between the normal and subscapularis partial tear conditions. In contrast, the LHB inferosuperior motion difference was the highest during 20° forward flexion with neutral rotation (0.7 ± 0.3, <i>p</i> = 0.045) between the normal and subscapularis partial tear conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Upon comparing normal and subscapularis partial tear conditions in this cadaveric study, high pathological movements of the LHB were observed during arm forward flexion with neutral rotation and abduction with external rotation. Repetitive activity in these arm positions could aggravate the condition in a partial subscapularis tear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"649-656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328111/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24233\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估正常和肩胛下肌部分撕裂情况下二头肌长头运动的差异,并通过尸体生物力学研究确定表现出最显著的二头肌长头运动差异的手臂位置。方法:6例新鲜冷冻尸体肩部LHB肌腱(男2例,女4例;平均年龄68.4±2.3岁;范围,65-71年)用金属珠标记,并安装在定制的肩部测试系统中。收集前屈或外展20°或60°、中性旋转和最大内外旋转扭矩为1.5 N·m的手臂位置数据。考虑到肩胛骨节律,尸体肩部20°或60°前屈或外展相当于体内肩部抬高30°或90°。使用三维数字化仪测量中外侧(半脱位)和上下(偏移)LHB运动,并分析正常和肩胛下肌部分撕裂情况的差异。结果:60°前屈伴中性旋转时LHB中外侧运动差异最大(1.2±0.4,p = 0.042), 20°前屈伴中性旋转时LHB中外侧运动差异最大(0.9±0.3,p = 0.024), 60°外展伴最大外旋时LHB中外侧运动差异最大(0.9±0.3,p = 0.036),正常与肩胛下肌部分撕裂时LHB中外侧运动差异较大。相比之下,肩胛下肌部分撕裂和正常肩胛下肌部分撕裂时,前屈20°和中性旋转时LHB上下运动差异最大(0.7±0.3,p = 0.045)。结论:在本尸体研究中,通过比较正常和肩胛下肌部分撕裂的情况,在手臂前屈中性旋转和外展外旋时观察到LHB的高病理运动。在这些手臂位置重复活动可加重部分肩胛下肌撕裂的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Arm Position with Increased Risk of Partial Subscapularis Tear Progression Owing to Subluxation of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon: Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

Arm Position with Increased Risk of Partial Subscapularis Tear Progression Owing to Subluxation of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon: Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

Arm Position with Increased Risk of Partial Subscapularis Tear Progression Owing to Subluxation of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon: Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

Arm Position with Increased Risk of Partial Subscapularis Tear Progression Owing to Subluxation of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon: Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

Backgroud: This study aimed to evaluate the differences in long head of biceps (LHB) motion between the normal and subscapularis intrasubstance partial tear conditions and identify the arm positions that exhibit the most significant LHB motion differences using a cadaveric biomechanical study.

Methods: The LHB tendons of 6 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (2 men and 4 women; mean age, 68.4 ± 2.3 years; range, 65-71 years) were marked with metal beads and mounted in a custom-made shoulder testing system. Data for arm positions at 20° or 60° of forward flexion or abduction, with neutral rotation and maximum internal and external rotation with a torque of 1.5 N·m, were collected. Considering the scapulohumeral rhythm, 20° or 60° forward flexion or abduction in a cadaveric shoulder corresponds to 30° or 90° shoulder elevation in vivo . Mediolateral (subluxation) and inferosuperior (excursion) LHB motions were measured using a 3-dimensional digitizer, and the differences between normal and subscapularis partial tear conditions were analyzed.

Results: While the LHB mediolateral motion difference was the highest during 60° forward flexion with neutral rotation (1.2 ± 0.4, p = 0.042), 20° forward flexion with neutral rotation (0.9 ± 0.3, p = 0.024) and 60° abduction with maximum external rotation (0.9 ± 0.3, p = 0.036) also demonstrated high mediolateral LHB motion difference between the normal and subscapularis partial tear conditions. In contrast, the LHB inferosuperior motion difference was the highest during 20° forward flexion with neutral rotation (0.7 ± 0.3, p = 0.045) between the normal and subscapularis partial tear conditions.

Conclusions: Upon comparing normal and subscapularis partial tear conditions in this cadaveric study, high pathological movements of the LHB were observed during arm forward flexion with neutral rotation and abduction with external rotation. Repetitive activity in these arm positions could aggravate the condition in a partial subscapularis tear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信