飞行员多感觉整合的改变:对裂变和融合声音诱导的闪光幻觉的易感性的检验。

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
I-Perception Pub Date : 2025-08-06 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1177/20416695251364202
Xing Peng, Yaowei Liang, Xiuyi Li, Jiaying Sun, Xiaoyu Tang, Aijun Wang, Chengyi Zeng
{"title":"飞行员多感觉整合的改变:对裂变和融合声音诱导的闪光幻觉的易感性的检验。","authors":"Xing Peng, Yaowei Liang, Xiuyi Li, Jiaying Sun, Xiaoyu Tang, Aijun Wang, Chengyi Zeng","doi":"10.1177/20416695251364202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pilots show superior visual processing capabilities in many visual domain tasks. However, the extent to which this perceptual advantage extends to multisensory processing requires validation. In this study, we examined multisensory integration of auditory and visual information in both pilot and control groups, utilizing two sound-induced flash illusions (SIFI) tasks: the fission illusion, where one flash coupled with two beeps is perceived as two flashes; and the fusion illusion, where two flashes with a single beep are perceived as one flash. Sixty-six participants were instructed to discern whether they observed one or two flashes while discounting irrelevant auditory beeps, across six conditions: one flash (1F), two flashes (2F), one flash/one beep (1F1B), one flash/two beeps (1F2B), two flashes/one beep (2F1B), and two flashes/two beeps (2F2B). We varied six stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) between auditory and visual events (25-150 ms) to assess the participants' temporal binding window (TBW). Signal detection theory was employed to analyze the group differences in illusion reports. The findings suggest that, while pilots are less susceptible to SIFI in either fission or fusion conditions, they only exhibit narrower TBW in the fusion condition, where pilots demonstrated a more gradual change in their susceptibility as SOA increases. In the fission condition, the group difference was primarily driven by visual sensitivity, whereas in the fusion condition it also likely reflected pilots' distinct multisensory integration mechanisms. Two alternative possibilities are discussed to explain the group differences and the different multisensory integration patterns in fission and fusion conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47194,"journal":{"name":"I-Perception","volume":"16 4","pages":"20416695251364202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12332369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions.\",\"authors\":\"Xing Peng, Yaowei Liang, Xiuyi Li, Jiaying Sun, Xiaoyu Tang, Aijun Wang, Chengyi Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20416695251364202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pilots show superior visual processing capabilities in many visual domain tasks. However, the extent to which this perceptual advantage extends to multisensory processing requires validation. In this study, we examined multisensory integration of auditory and visual information in both pilot and control groups, utilizing two sound-induced flash illusions (SIFI) tasks: the fission illusion, where one flash coupled with two beeps is perceived as two flashes; and the fusion illusion, where two flashes with a single beep are perceived as one flash. Sixty-six participants were instructed to discern whether they observed one or two flashes while discounting irrelevant auditory beeps, across six conditions: one flash (1F), two flashes (2F), one flash/one beep (1F1B), one flash/two beeps (1F2B), two flashes/one beep (2F1B), and two flashes/two beeps (2F2B). We varied six stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) between auditory and visual events (25-150 ms) to assess the participants' temporal binding window (TBW). Signal detection theory was employed to analyze the group differences in illusion reports. The findings suggest that, while pilots are less susceptible to SIFI in either fission or fusion conditions, they only exhibit narrower TBW in the fusion condition, where pilots demonstrated a more gradual change in their susceptibility as SOA increases. In the fission condition, the group difference was primarily driven by visual sensitivity, whereas in the fusion condition it also likely reflected pilots' distinct multisensory integration mechanisms. Two alternative possibilities are discussed to explain the group differences and the different multisensory integration patterns in fission and fusion conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"I-Perception\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"20416695251364202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12332369/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"I-Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251364202\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I-Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251364202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

飞行员在许多视域任务中表现出优越的视觉处理能力。然而,这种感知优势扩展到多感官处理的程度需要验证。在这项研究中,我们利用两种声音诱发的闪光错觉(SIFI)任务,检查了试验组和对照组的听觉和视觉信息的多感官整合:裂变错觉,其中一个闪光加上两个哔哔声被认为是两个闪光;还有融合幻觉,即两次闪光和一次哔哔声被认为是一次闪光。66名参与者被要求在六种情况下分辨他们是观察到一次闪光还是两次闪光,同时忽略无关的听觉哔哔声,包括一次闪光(1F)、两次闪光(2F)、一次闪光/一次哔哔声(1F1B)、一次闪光/两次哔哔声(1F2B)、两次闪光/一次哔哔声(2F1B)和两次闪光/两次哔哔声(2F2B)。我们在听觉和视觉事件(25-150 ms)之间改变了6个刺激启动异步(soa),以评估参与者的时间绑定窗口(TBW)。采用信号检测理论分析错觉报告的组间差异。研究结果表明,虽然飞行员在裂变或聚变条件下不太容易受到SIFI的影响,但他们只在聚变条件下表现出更窄的TBW,随着SOA的增加,飞行员表现出更渐进的敏感性变化。在裂变条件下,群体差异主要是由视觉敏感性驱动的,而在融合条件下,这也可能反映了飞行员不同的多感觉整合机制。讨论了两种可能性来解释群体差异和裂变和聚变条件下不同的多感觉整合模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions.

Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions.

Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions.

Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions.

Pilots show superior visual processing capabilities in many visual domain tasks. However, the extent to which this perceptual advantage extends to multisensory processing requires validation. In this study, we examined multisensory integration of auditory and visual information in both pilot and control groups, utilizing two sound-induced flash illusions (SIFI) tasks: the fission illusion, where one flash coupled with two beeps is perceived as two flashes; and the fusion illusion, where two flashes with a single beep are perceived as one flash. Sixty-six participants were instructed to discern whether they observed one or two flashes while discounting irrelevant auditory beeps, across six conditions: one flash (1F), two flashes (2F), one flash/one beep (1F1B), one flash/two beeps (1F2B), two flashes/one beep (2F1B), and two flashes/two beeps (2F2B). We varied six stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) between auditory and visual events (25-150 ms) to assess the participants' temporal binding window (TBW). Signal detection theory was employed to analyze the group differences in illusion reports. The findings suggest that, while pilots are less susceptible to SIFI in either fission or fusion conditions, they only exhibit narrower TBW in the fusion condition, where pilots demonstrated a more gradual change in their susceptibility as SOA increases. In the fission condition, the group difference was primarily driven by visual sensitivity, whereas in the fusion condition it also likely reflected pilots' distinct multisensory integration mechanisms. Two alternative possibilities are discussed to explain the group differences and the different multisensory integration patterns in fission and fusion conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
I-Perception
I-Perception PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信