认知负荷在临床护士任务复杂性与指南依从性关系中的中介作用:一项针对中国护士的横断面调查。

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
Shan Zhang, Lu Liu, Shu Ding, Tingting Peng, Jun Wang, Ying Wu
{"title":"认知负荷在临床护士任务复杂性与指南依从性关系中的中介作用:一项针对中国护士的横断面调查。","authors":"Shan Zhang, Lu Liu, Shu Ding, Tingting Peng, Jun Wang, Ying Wu","doi":"10.1177/17449871251329197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suboptimal adherence to guidelines is a common phenomenon in clinical settings. Studies regarding the complexity of tasks, cognitive load, and adherence to guidelines among clinical nurses are noteworthy, but limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether cognitive load mediates the association between task complexity and guideline adherence in clinical nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 580 clinical nurses from 8 tertiary hospitals were included in the cross-sectional survey. A self-reported survey included guideline adherence, task complexity, and cognitive load. We conducted correlation and multiple linear regression analysis and performed a mediation effect analysis using PROCESS with 5000 resamples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The linear regression showed that task complexity significantly predicted intrinsic cognitive load (<i>a<sub>1</sub></i>  = 0.322, <i>p</i> < 0.001), intrinsic cognitive load significantly predicted guideline adherence (<i>b<sub>1</sub></i>  = -0.113, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and task complexity had a direct impact on guideline adherence (<i>c</i>' = 0.126, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Both intrinsic cognitive load (effect size = -0.037, 95%CI: -0.061, -0.019) and germane cognitive load (effect size = 0.180, 95%CI: -0.269, -0.171) played a partial mediating effect between task complexity and guideline adherence among nurses, contributing to 53.16% of the overall effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>Nursing administrators should prioritise the cognitive load for clinical nurses when allocating intricate assignments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871251329197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mediator effects of cognitive load on the relationship between task complexity and guideline adherence among clinical nurses: a cross-sectional survey of nurses in China.\",\"authors\":\"Shan Zhang, Lu Liu, Shu Ding, Tingting Peng, Jun Wang, Ying Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17449871251329197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suboptimal adherence to guidelines is a common phenomenon in clinical settings. Studies regarding the complexity of tasks, cognitive load, and adherence to guidelines among clinical nurses are noteworthy, but limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether cognitive load mediates the association between task complexity and guideline adherence in clinical nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 580 clinical nurses from 8 tertiary hospitals were included in the cross-sectional survey. A self-reported survey included guideline adherence, task complexity, and cognitive load. We conducted correlation and multiple linear regression analysis and performed a mediation effect analysis using PROCESS with 5000 resamples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The linear regression showed that task complexity significantly predicted intrinsic cognitive load (<i>a<sub>1</sub></i>  = 0.322, <i>p</i> < 0.001), intrinsic cognitive load significantly predicted guideline adherence (<i>b<sub>1</sub></i>  = -0.113, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and task complexity had a direct impact on guideline adherence (<i>c</i>' = 0.126, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Both intrinsic cognitive load (effect size = -0.037, 95%CI: -0.061, -0.019) and germane cognitive load (effect size = 0.180, 95%CI: -0.269, -0.171) played a partial mediating effect between task complexity and guideline adherence among nurses, contributing to 53.16% of the overall effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>Nursing administrators should prioritise the cognitive load for clinical nurses when allocating intricate assignments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17449871251329197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331640/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871251329197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871251329197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对指南的次优遵守是临床环境中的常见现象。关于任务复杂性、认知负荷和临床护士对指导方针的依从性的研究值得注意,但有限。目的:探讨认知负荷是否在临床护士任务复杂性与指南依从性之间起中介作用。方法:对8所三级医院580名临床护士进行横断面调查。一项自我报告的调查包括指南依从性、任务复杂性和认知负荷。我们进行了相关和多元线性回归分析,并使用PROCESS对5000个样本进行了中介效应分析。结果:线性回归结果显示,任务复杂性显著预测内在认知负荷(a1 = 0.322, p b1 = -0.113, p c' = 0.126, p)。结论/实践启示:护理管理者在分配复杂任务时应优先考虑临床护士的认知负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mediator effects of cognitive load on the relationship between task complexity and guideline adherence among clinical nurses: a cross-sectional survey of nurses in China.

Background: Suboptimal adherence to guidelines is a common phenomenon in clinical settings. Studies regarding the complexity of tasks, cognitive load, and adherence to guidelines among clinical nurses are noteworthy, but limited.

Purpose: To investigate whether cognitive load mediates the association between task complexity and guideline adherence in clinical nurses.

Methods: In total, 580 clinical nurses from 8 tertiary hospitals were included in the cross-sectional survey. A self-reported survey included guideline adherence, task complexity, and cognitive load. We conducted correlation and multiple linear regression analysis and performed a mediation effect analysis using PROCESS with 5000 resamples.

Results: The linear regression showed that task complexity significantly predicted intrinsic cognitive load (a1  = 0.322, p < 0.001), intrinsic cognitive load significantly predicted guideline adherence (b1  = -0.113, p < 0.001), and task complexity had a direct impact on guideline adherence (c' = 0.126, p < 0.001). Both intrinsic cognitive load (effect size = -0.037, 95%CI: -0.061, -0.019) and germane cognitive load (effect size = 0.180, 95%CI: -0.269, -0.171) played a partial mediating effect between task complexity and guideline adherence among nurses, contributing to 53.16% of the overall effect.

Conclusions/implications for practice: Nursing administrators should prioritise the cognitive load for clinical nurses when allocating intricate assignments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信