肱二头肌远端修复后的门诊与家庭物理治疗。

IF 1.8 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Brandon L Rogalski, Liam T Kane, Alayna Vaughan, Serge Tzeuton, Surena Namdari, Charles L Getz
{"title":"肱二头肌远端修复后的门诊与家庭物理治疗。","authors":"Brandon L Rogalski, Liam T Kane, Alayna Vaughan, Serge Tzeuton, Surena Namdari, Charles L Getz","doi":"10.22038/abjs.2025.81641.3717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Distal biceps repair is a common orthopedic procedure, but there is still debate regarding the optimal post-operative care for patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of at-home physical therapy compared to outpatient physical therapy following distal biceps tendon repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of distal biceps repairs performed between 2012 and 2017 by four fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons at one institution was undertaken. Patients were grouped into outpatient physical therapy and at-home therapy groups. Exclusion criteria included any patients who did not undergo a direct repair of the distal biceps and cases in which allograft augmentation was utilized. Postoperative complications were identified by manual chart review. After a minimum of three years follow-up, demographic information as well as elbow functional outcome scores including the Quick Dash, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and Oxford Elbow Scores were obtained via phone calls and online surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and forty-six patients were included in this study at a mean follow-up of 6.3 years for patients who attended outpatient physical therapy and 5.9 years for patients who performed an at-home therapy program. There were twenty-eight patients in the at-home physical therapy group and one hundred eighteen patients in the outpatient physical therapy group. There were two complications: one re-ruptured distal biceps tendon requiring a revision surgery in the at-home patient cohort, and one post-operative posterior interosseous nerve palsy that recovered after 6 months in the outpatient rehabilitation group. We found there was no significant difference between the two groups for any of the three functional elbow scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients undergoing routine distal biceps repair may achieve similar clinical outcomes with a regimented at-home physical therapy protocol in lieu of formal outpatient physical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 7","pages":"420-425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outpatient versus At-Home Physical Therapy Following Distal Biceps Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon L Rogalski, Liam T Kane, Alayna Vaughan, Serge Tzeuton, Surena Namdari, Charles L Getz\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/abjs.2025.81641.3717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Distal biceps repair is a common orthopedic procedure, but there is still debate regarding the optimal post-operative care for patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of at-home physical therapy compared to outpatient physical therapy following distal biceps tendon repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of distal biceps repairs performed between 2012 and 2017 by four fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons at one institution was undertaken. Patients were grouped into outpatient physical therapy and at-home therapy groups. Exclusion criteria included any patients who did not undergo a direct repair of the distal biceps and cases in which allograft augmentation was utilized. Postoperative complications were identified by manual chart review. After a minimum of three years follow-up, demographic information as well as elbow functional outcome scores including the Quick Dash, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and Oxford Elbow Scores were obtained via phone calls and online surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and forty-six patients were included in this study at a mean follow-up of 6.3 years for patients who attended outpatient physical therapy and 5.9 years for patients who performed an at-home therapy program. There were twenty-eight patients in the at-home physical therapy group and one hundred eighteen patients in the outpatient physical therapy group. There were two complications: one re-ruptured distal biceps tendon requiring a revision surgery in the at-home patient cohort, and one post-operative posterior interosseous nerve palsy that recovered after 6 months in the outpatient rehabilitation group. We found there was no significant difference between the two groups for any of the three functional elbow scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients undergoing routine distal biceps repair may achieve similar clinical outcomes with a regimented at-home physical therapy protocol in lieu of formal outpatient physical therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"volume\":\"13 7\",\"pages\":\"420-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335199/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/abjs.2025.81641.3717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/abjs.2025.81641.3717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肱二头肌远端修复是一种常见的骨科手术,但关于患者的最佳术后护理仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估肱二头肌远端肌腱修复后家庭物理治疗与门诊物理治疗的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2012年至2017年在一家机构接受过奖学金培训的四位骨科医生进行的远端肱二头肌修复手术。患者分为门诊物理治疗组和家庭治疗组。排除标准包括任何未接受远端二头肌直接修复的患者和使用同种异体移植物增强的病例。术后并发症通过手工图表检查确定。在至少三年的随访后,通过电话和在线调查获得人口统计信息以及肘部功能评分,包括Quick Dash, Mayo肘部表现指数和牛津肘部评分。结果:146名患者被纳入本研究,接受门诊物理治疗的患者平均随访6.3年,接受家庭治疗的患者平均随访5.9年。有28名患者在家庭物理治疗组和118名患者在门诊物理治疗组。有两个并发症:在家庭患者队列中,一个二头肌远端肌腱再次断裂,需要进行翻修手术;在门诊康复组中,一个术后后骨间神经麻痹,在6个月后恢复。我们发现两组肘关节功能评分没有显著差异。结论:接受常规肱二头肌远端修复的患者可以通过有组织的家庭物理治疗方案代替正式的门诊物理治疗获得相似的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outpatient versus At-Home Physical Therapy Following Distal Biceps Repair.

Outpatient versus At-Home Physical Therapy Following Distal Biceps Repair.

Objectives: Distal biceps repair is a common orthopedic procedure, but there is still debate regarding the optimal post-operative care for patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of at-home physical therapy compared to outpatient physical therapy following distal biceps tendon repair.

Methods: A retrospective review of distal biceps repairs performed between 2012 and 2017 by four fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons at one institution was undertaken. Patients were grouped into outpatient physical therapy and at-home therapy groups. Exclusion criteria included any patients who did not undergo a direct repair of the distal biceps and cases in which allograft augmentation was utilized. Postoperative complications were identified by manual chart review. After a minimum of three years follow-up, demographic information as well as elbow functional outcome scores including the Quick Dash, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and Oxford Elbow Scores were obtained via phone calls and online surveys.

Results: One hundred and forty-six patients were included in this study at a mean follow-up of 6.3 years for patients who attended outpatient physical therapy and 5.9 years for patients who performed an at-home therapy program. There were twenty-eight patients in the at-home physical therapy group and one hundred eighteen patients in the outpatient physical therapy group. There were two complications: one re-ruptured distal biceps tendon requiring a revision surgery in the at-home patient cohort, and one post-operative posterior interosseous nerve palsy that recovered after 6 months in the outpatient rehabilitation group. We found there was no significant difference between the two groups for any of the three functional elbow scores.

Conclusion: Patients undergoing routine distal biceps repair may achieve similar clinical outcomes with a regimented at-home physical therapy protocol in lieu of formal outpatient physical therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信