“你要什么就有什么”:英国儿科肿瘤学慈善基金的影响——从1960年到2000年。

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lucy Walsh
{"title":"“你要什么就有什么”:英国儿科肿瘤学慈善基金的影响——从1960年到2000年。","authors":"Lucy Walsh","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2024-013221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The considerable charitable funding of paediatric oncology propelled the medical specialty in the late 1970s and early 1980s, offering support across research, clinical services and psychosocial provision. In postwar Britain, emotive appeals to the public were met with generous donations, which allowed cancer charities to fund research despite a lack of central funding. Besides funding, however, charities have been able to respond in an agile way to the needs of children with cancer and their families, meeting this need where National Health Service funding could not. They also provided useful pump priming for important services that central funding subsequently took over. Reliance on charitable funding in paediatric oncology, however, could leave services and research organisations disrupted and unable to make long-term strategic plans. Charities were able to provide psychosocial care that has responded to the changing meaning of a cancer diagnosis in childhood. Although not essential or life-saving, this provision attempted to alleviate some of the practical, financial and, as far as possible, emotional difficulties experienced by children with cancer and their families. Despite the enormous positive change propelled by charitable giving in the specialty, this funding model can see some health inequalities exacerbated, both between regions and patient groups with other illnesses or disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Whatever you asked for you got\\\": the impact of charitable funding of paediatric oncology in the UK - from 1960 to 2000.\",\"authors\":\"Lucy Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/medhum-2024-013221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The considerable charitable funding of paediatric oncology propelled the medical specialty in the late 1970s and early 1980s, offering support across research, clinical services and psychosocial provision. In postwar Britain, emotive appeals to the public were met with generous donations, which allowed cancer charities to fund research despite a lack of central funding. Besides funding, however, charities have been able to respond in an agile way to the needs of children with cancer and their families, meeting this need where National Health Service funding could not. They also provided useful pump priming for important services that central funding subsequently took over. Reliance on charitable funding in paediatric oncology, however, could leave services and research organisations disrupted and unable to make long-term strategic plans. Charities were able to provide psychosocial care that has responded to the changing meaning of a cancer diagnosis in childhood. Although not essential or life-saving, this provision attempted to alleviate some of the practical, financial and, as far as possible, emotional difficulties experienced by children with cancer and their families. Despite the enormous positive change propelled by charitable giving in the specialty, this funding model can see some health inequalities exacerbated, both between regions and patient groups with other illnesses or disabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2024-013221\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2024-013221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪70年代末和80年代初,儿科肿瘤学的大量慈善资金推动了医学专业的发展,为研究、临床服务和心理社会提供了支持。在战后的英国,对公众的情感呼吁得到了慷慨的捐赠,这使得癌症慈善机构能够在缺乏中央资助的情况下为研究提供资金。然而,除了资金之外,慈善机构还能够以灵活的方式对癌症儿童及其家庭的需求作出反应,满足国民保健服务无法提供资金的需求。它们还为随后由中央资金接管的重要服务提供了有益的刺激。然而,儿科肿瘤学对慈善基金的依赖可能会使服务和研究机构陷入混乱,无法制定长期战略计划。慈善机构能够提供社会心理护理,以应对儿童癌症诊断意义的变化。这项规定虽然不是必需的,也不是挽救生命的,但它试图减轻癌症儿童及其家庭所经历的一些实际、经济和尽可能的情感困难。尽管该专业的慈善捐赠推动了巨大的积极变化,但这种资助模式可能会加剧地区之间和患有其他疾病或残疾的患者群体之间的一些健康不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Whatever you asked for you got": the impact of charitable funding of paediatric oncology in the UK - from 1960 to 2000.

The considerable charitable funding of paediatric oncology propelled the medical specialty in the late 1970s and early 1980s, offering support across research, clinical services and psychosocial provision. In postwar Britain, emotive appeals to the public were met with generous donations, which allowed cancer charities to fund research despite a lack of central funding. Besides funding, however, charities have been able to respond in an agile way to the needs of children with cancer and their families, meeting this need where National Health Service funding could not. They also provided useful pump priming for important services that central funding subsequently took over. Reliance on charitable funding in paediatric oncology, however, could leave services and research organisations disrupted and unable to make long-term strategic plans. Charities were able to provide psychosocial care that has responded to the changing meaning of a cancer diagnosis in childhood. Although not essential or life-saving, this provision attempted to alleviate some of the practical, financial and, as far as possible, emotional difficulties experienced by children with cancer and their families. Despite the enormous positive change propelled by charitable giving in the specialty, this funding model can see some health inequalities exacerbated, both between regions and patient groups with other illnesses or disabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信