抗凝剂在肝硬化和门静脉血栓患者中的疗效和安全性:随机和非随机研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2025-08-08 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70194
Muhammad Hassan Waseem, Zain Ul Abideen, Marium Khan, Barka Sajid, Noor Ul Huda Ramzan, Rabeya Farid, Javed Iqbal, Jalib Ahmed, Aqsa Kabir, Maryam Shahzad, Javeria Asif, Muhammad Osama, Sania Aimen, Ammad Javaid Chaudhary, Ameer Haider Cheema
{"title":"抗凝剂在肝硬化和门静脉血栓患者中的疗效和安全性:随机和非随机研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Muhammad Hassan Waseem, Zain Ul Abideen, Marium Khan, Barka Sajid, Noor Ul Huda Ramzan, Rabeya Farid, Javed Iqbal, Jalib Ahmed, Aqsa Kabir, Maryam Shahzad, Javeria Asif, Muhammad Osama, Sania Aimen, Ammad Javaid Chaudhary, Ameer Haider Cheema","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) contributes substantially to morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients. A clear insight into the anticoagulation therapy benefits in these patients could improve clinical decision-making. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Anticoagulants in cirrhotic patients with PVT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to September 2024. The Risk Ratios (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous outcomes under the random effects model using Review Manager 5.4.1. The primary endpoint of interest is PVT recanalization. Quality assessment was done through the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane RoB2.0 tool. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was done to investigate the cause of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed through funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies (including 19 cohorts and 4 Randomized trials), pooling 81,599 patients, were included in the analysis. Anticoagulants significantly increased the PVT recanalization (RR = 2.00; 95% CI: [1.59, 2.52]; <i>p</i> < 0.00001; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 13%), PVT improvement (RR = 1.98; 95% CI: [1.70, 2.29], <i>p</i> < 0.00001; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%) while decreasing the PVT stability (RR = 0.78; 95% CI: [0.62,0.99], <i>p</i> = 0.04; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 19%) and PVT progression (RR = 0.42; 95% CI: [0.29, 0.60], <i>p</i> < 0.00001; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 27%). Other outcomes including mortality (RR = 0.53; 95% CI: [0.27, 1.03]; <i>p</i> = 0.06; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 94%), total bleeding (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: [0.76, 1.37], <i>p</i> = 0.89; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 31%), esophageal variceal bleeding (RR = 0.74; 95% CI: [0.54, 1.01], <i>p</i> = 0.06; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 56%), Gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: [0.78, 1.48]; <i>p</i> = 0.66, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 13%) and Intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 1.19; 95% CI: [0.89, 1.58], <i>p</i> = 0.24, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%) were comparable between the 2 arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anticoagulants significantly increased PVT recanalization and PVT improvement while decreasing PVT stability and PVT progression in cirrhotic patients. Other outcomes were comparable between the two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"9 8","pages":"e70194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Anticoagulants in Patients With Cirrhosis and Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Hassan Waseem, Zain Ul Abideen, Marium Khan, Barka Sajid, Noor Ul Huda Ramzan, Rabeya Farid, Javed Iqbal, Jalib Ahmed, Aqsa Kabir, Maryam Shahzad, Javeria Asif, Muhammad Osama, Sania Aimen, Ammad Javaid Chaudhary, Ameer Haider Cheema\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.70194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) contributes substantially to morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients. A clear insight into the anticoagulation therapy benefits in these patients could improve clinical decision-making. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Anticoagulants in cirrhotic patients with PVT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to September 2024. The Risk Ratios (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous outcomes under the random effects model using Review Manager 5.4.1. The primary endpoint of interest is PVT recanalization. Quality assessment was done through the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane RoB2.0 tool. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was done to investigate the cause of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed through funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies (including 19 cohorts and 4 Randomized trials), pooling 81,599 patients, were included in the analysis. Anticoagulants significantly increased the PVT recanalization (RR = 2.00; 95% CI: [1.59, 2.52]; <i>p</i> < 0.00001; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 13%), PVT improvement (RR = 1.98; 95% CI: [1.70, 2.29], <i>p</i> < 0.00001; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%) while decreasing the PVT stability (RR = 0.78; 95% CI: [0.62,0.99], <i>p</i> = 0.04; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 19%) and PVT progression (RR = 0.42; 95% CI: [0.29, 0.60], <i>p</i> < 0.00001; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 27%). Other outcomes including mortality (RR = 0.53; 95% CI: [0.27, 1.03]; <i>p</i> = 0.06; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 94%), total bleeding (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: [0.76, 1.37], <i>p</i> = 0.89; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 31%), esophageal variceal bleeding (RR = 0.74; 95% CI: [0.54, 1.01], <i>p</i> = 0.06; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 56%), Gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: [0.78, 1.48]; <i>p</i> = 0.66, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 13%) and Intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 1.19; 95% CI: [0.89, 1.58], <i>p</i> = 0.24, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%) were comparable between the 2 arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anticoagulants significantly increased PVT recanalization and PVT improvement while decreasing PVT stability and PVT progression in cirrhotic patients. Other outcomes were comparable between the two groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"9 8\",\"pages\":\"e70194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:门静脉血栓形成(PVT)是肝硬化患者发病率和死亡率的重要因素。清楚地了解抗凝治疗对这些患者的益处可以改善临床决策。本荟萃分析旨在评估抗凝剂对肝硬化pvt患者的疗效和安全性。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane Library和ScienceDirect,检索时间从成立到2024年9月。采用Review Manager 5.4.1将随机效应模型下具有95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)合并为二分类结果。主要关注的终点是PVT再通。通过纽卡斯尔渥太华量表和Cochrane RoB2.0工具进行质量评估。进行留一敏感性分析以探讨异质性的原因。通过漏斗图评估发表偏倚。结果:23项研究(包括19个队列和4个随机试验)纳入分析,共纳入81599例患者。抗凝剂显著增加PVT再通(RR = 2.00;95% ci: [1.59, 2.52];p I 2 = 13%), PVT改善(RR = 1.98;95% CI: [1.70, 2.29], p 2 = 0%),同时降低PVT稳定性(RR = 0.78;95% CI: [0.62,0.99], p = 0.04;I 2 = 19%)和PVT进展(RR = 0.42;95% CI: [0.29, 0.60], p 2 = 27%)。其他结局包括死亡率(RR = 0.53;95% ci: [0.27, 1.03];p = 0.06;I 2 = 94%)、总出血(RR = 1.02;95% CI: [0.76, 1.37], p = 0.89;I 2 = 31%)、食管静脉曲张出血(RR = 0.74;95% CI: [0.54, 1.01], p = 0.06;I 2 = 56%)、消化道出血(RR = 1.07;95% ci: [0.78, 1.48];p = 0.66, i2 = 13%)和颅内出血(RR = 1.19;95% CI: [0.89, 1.58], p = 0.24, i2 = 0%)在两组间具有可比性。结论:抗凝剂可显著增加肝硬化患者PVT再通和改善PVT,同时降低PVT稳定性和PVT进展。两组之间的其他结果具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and Safety of Anticoagulants in Patients With Cirrhosis and Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.

Efficacy and Safety of Anticoagulants in Patients With Cirrhosis and Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.

Efficacy and Safety of Anticoagulants in Patients With Cirrhosis and Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.

Efficacy and Safety of Anticoagulants in Patients With Cirrhosis and Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.

Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) contributes substantially to morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients. A clear insight into the anticoagulation therapy benefits in these patients could improve clinical decision-making. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Anticoagulants in cirrhotic patients with PVT.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to September 2024. The Risk Ratios (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous outcomes under the random effects model using Review Manager 5.4.1. The primary endpoint of interest is PVT recanalization. Quality assessment was done through the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane RoB2.0 tool. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was done to investigate the cause of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed through funnel plots.

Results: Twenty-three studies (including 19 cohorts and 4 Randomized trials), pooling 81,599 patients, were included in the analysis. Anticoagulants significantly increased the PVT recanalization (RR = 2.00; 95% CI: [1.59, 2.52]; p < 0.00001; I 2 = 13%), PVT improvement (RR = 1.98; 95% CI: [1.70, 2.29], p < 0.00001; I 2 = 0%) while decreasing the PVT stability (RR = 0.78; 95% CI: [0.62,0.99], p = 0.04; I 2 = 19%) and PVT progression (RR = 0.42; 95% CI: [0.29, 0.60], p < 0.00001; I 2 = 27%). Other outcomes including mortality (RR = 0.53; 95% CI: [0.27, 1.03]; p = 0.06; I 2 = 94%), total bleeding (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: [0.76, 1.37], p = 0.89; I 2 = 31%), esophageal variceal bleeding (RR = 0.74; 95% CI: [0.54, 1.01], p = 0.06; I 2 = 56%), Gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: [0.78, 1.48]; p = 0.66, I 2 = 13%) and Intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 1.19; 95% CI: [0.89, 1.58], p = 0.24, I 2 = 0%) were comparable between the 2 arms.

Conclusion: Anticoagulants significantly increased PVT recanalization and PVT improvement while decreasing PVT stability and PVT progression in cirrhotic patients. Other outcomes were comparable between the two groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信