不要相信FOBT的谎言——一项观察性研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2025-08-08 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70229
A Tanousian, P Watanakunakorn, N Obad, T Singh
{"title":"不要相信FOBT的谎言——一项观察性研究。","authors":"A Tanousian, P Watanakunakorn, N Obad, T Singh","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is often ordered in emergency settings for patients presenting with hematemesis or hematochezia. However, FOBT is FDA-approved solely for colorectal cancer screening in the outpatient setting. Its use in evaluating suspected acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding may misguide clinical decision-making and contribute to unnecessary healthcare utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study assessed the diagnostic utility of FOBT in patients admitted to Sierra View Medical Center between 2022 and 2024 with suspected GI bleeding. Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify patients with positive FOBT results and an admitting diagnosis related to GI bleeding. Data collected included physical examination findings, hemoglobin trends, transfusion requirements, and endoscopic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients were identified, of whom 70 met inclusion criteria. Among these, only 11 patients (15.7%) underwent endoscopic intervention for an acute bleeding source. Patients requiring endoscopic intervention were approximately 10% more likely to have positive physical exam findings compared to those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings support existing evidence that FOBT has limited diagnostic value in the setting of suspected acute GI bleeding. Current gastroenterology guidelines do not recommend the use of single-card FOBT for this indication. This study reinforces that positive FOBT results should not guide admission or diagnostic decision-making in the inpatient evaluation of suspected GI bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"9 8","pages":"e70229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Don't Fall for the FOBT Fib-An Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"A Tanousian, P Watanakunakorn, N Obad, T Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.70229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is often ordered in emergency settings for patients presenting with hematemesis or hematochezia. However, FOBT is FDA-approved solely for colorectal cancer screening in the outpatient setting. Its use in evaluating suspected acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding may misguide clinical decision-making and contribute to unnecessary healthcare utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study assessed the diagnostic utility of FOBT in patients admitted to Sierra View Medical Center between 2022 and 2024 with suspected GI bleeding. Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify patients with positive FOBT results and an admitting diagnosis related to GI bleeding. Data collected included physical examination findings, hemoglobin trends, transfusion requirements, and endoscopic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients were identified, of whom 70 met inclusion criteria. Among these, only 11 patients (15.7%) underwent endoscopic intervention for an acute bleeding source. Patients requiring endoscopic intervention were approximately 10% more likely to have positive physical exam findings compared to those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings support existing evidence that FOBT has limited diagnostic value in the setting of suspected acute GI bleeding. Current gastroenterology guidelines do not recommend the use of single-card FOBT for this indication. This study reinforces that positive FOBT results should not guide admission or diagnostic decision-making in the inpatient evaluation of suspected GI bleeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"9 8\",\"pages\":\"e70229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334316/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:粪便隐血检查(FOBT)经常被要求在紧急情况下出现呕血或便血的患者。然而,FOBT仅被fda批准用于门诊结肠直肠癌筛查。它在评估疑似急性胃肠道(GI)出血时可能会误导临床决策并导致不必要的医疗保健使用。方法:这项回顾性观察性研究评估了FOBT在2022年至2024年期间在Sierra View医疗中心收治的疑似胃肠道出血患者中的诊断效用。我们回顾了电子病历,以确定FOBT结果阳性的患者和与胃肠道出血相关的入院诊断。收集的数据包括体格检查结果、血红蛋白趋势、输血需求和内窥镜结果。结果:共纳入75例患者,其中70例符合纳入标准。其中,只有11例(15.7%)患者接受了急性出血源的内镜干预。需要内窥镜干预的患者体检结果阳性的可能性比不需要内窥镜干预的患者约高10%。结论:本研究结果支持现有证据,即FOBT对疑似急性消化道出血的诊断价值有限。目前的胃肠病学指南不推荐使用单卡FOBT用于这一适应症。本研究强调,FOBT阳性结果不应指导住院患者对疑似消化道出血的入院或诊断决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Don't Fall for the FOBT Fib-An Observational Study.

Introduction: Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is often ordered in emergency settings for patients presenting with hematemesis or hematochezia. However, FOBT is FDA-approved solely for colorectal cancer screening in the outpatient setting. Its use in evaluating suspected acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding may misguide clinical decision-making and contribute to unnecessary healthcare utilization.

Methods: This retrospective observational study assessed the diagnostic utility of FOBT in patients admitted to Sierra View Medical Center between 2022 and 2024 with suspected GI bleeding. Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify patients with positive FOBT results and an admitting diagnosis related to GI bleeding. Data collected included physical examination findings, hemoglobin trends, transfusion requirements, and endoscopic outcomes.

Results: Seventy-five patients were identified, of whom 70 met inclusion criteria. Among these, only 11 patients (15.7%) underwent endoscopic intervention for an acute bleeding source. Patients requiring endoscopic intervention were approximately 10% more likely to have positive physical exam findings compared to those who did not.

Conclusion: The findings support existing evidence that FOBT has limited diagnostic value in the setting of suspected acute GI bleeding. Current gastroenterology guidelines do not recommend the use of single-card FOBT for this indication. This study reinforces that positive FOBT results should not guide admission or diagnostic decision-making in the inpatient evaluation of suspected GI bleeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信