{"title":"3D打印薄板和固体三周期最小表面多孔结构的流动和传热特性。","authors":"Jiajie Hu, Wei Xu, Huixin Liang, Jianping Shi, Wenlai Tang, Baocheng Guo, Jiquan Yang, Liya Zhu","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-15029-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) are recently widely employed in thermal engineering applications due to their smooth surfaces, high surface area to volume ratio and mathematically controlled geometry features. Although the sheet-type TPMS shows good heat transfer capacity between the fluid and the skeleton surface, the pressure drop of this structure is large resulting from its partially disconnected surface. In this paper, four TPMS structures, sheet Gyroid, solid Gyroid, solid Primitive and solid Diamond were designed and manufactured by 3D printing technology. The heat transfer performance of different TPMS structures and the fin structure was researched by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and experimental methods. The results showed that the heat dissipation capability of the fin structure was better than that of the TPMS structures under ultra-low speed airflow. Otherwise, the heat transfer performance of the solid TPMS is better than both of the sheet TPMS and the fins structures. Although the sheet TPMS has higher surface area compared to the solid TPMS, the flow speed was decreased along the internal channels leading to greater thermal resistance and lower thermal transferring efficiency. When the gas velocity was less than 4 m/s, the solid Gyroid expressed the best performance among the three solid TPMS structures caused by its higher surface area connected to the heat source. Under higher gas velocity, the solid Diamond was proved to have better performance led by higher flow speed within channels. The heat transfer coefficient of solid Diamond was 110% and 59% larger than that of the solid Primitive and the solid Gyroid, respectively. The Nusselt number of solid Diamond was 10% and 12% greater than that of the solid Primitive and the solid Gyroid, respectively. The research proves that the solid TPMS can be used to replace the fin structure in heat exchangers and provides a basis for design and optimization of TPMS-based heat exchangers in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"29255"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flow and heat transfer characteristics of 3D printed sheet and solid triply periodic minimal surfaces porous structures.\",\"authors\":\"Jiajie Hu, Wei Xu, Huixin Liang, Jianping Shi, Wenlai Tang, Baocheng Guo, Jiquan Yang, Liya Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-15029-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) are recently widely employed in thermal engineering applications due to their smooth surfaces, high surface area to volume ratio and mathematically controlled geometry features. Although the sheet-type TPMS shows good heat transfer capacity between the fluid and the skeleton surface, the pressure drop of this structure is large resulting from its partially disconnected surface. In this paper, four TPMS structures, sheet Gyroid, solid Gyroid, solid Primitive and solid Diamond were designed and manufactured by 3D printing technology. The heat transfer performance of different TPMS structures and the fin structure was researched by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and experimental methods. The results showed that the heat dissipation capability of the fin structure was better than that of the TPMS structures under ultra-low speed airflow. Otherwise, the heat transfer performance of the solid TPMS is better than both of the sheet TPMS and the fins structures. Although the sheet TPMS has higher surface area compared to the solid TPMS, the flow speed was decreased along the internal channels leading to greater thermal resistance and lower thermal transferring efficiency. When the gas velocity was less than 4 m/s, the solid Gyroid expressed the best performance among the three solid TPMS structures caused by its higher surface area connected to the heat source. Under higher gas velocity, the solid Diamond was proved to have better performance led by higher flow speed within channels. The heat transfer coefficient of solid Diamond was 110% and 59% larger than that of the solid Primitive and the solid Gyroid, respectively. The Nusselt number of solid Diamond was 10% and 12% greater than that of the solid Primitive and the solid Gyroid, respectively. The research proves that the solid TPMS can be used to replace the fin structure in heat exchangers and provides a basis for design and optimization of TPMS-based heat exchangers in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"29255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336323/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15029-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15029-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flow and heat transfer characteristics of 3D printed sheet and solid triply periodic minimal surfaces porous structures.
Triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) are recently widely employed in thermal engineering applications due to their smooth surfaces, high surface area to volume ratio and mathematically controlled geometry features. Although the sheet-type TPMS shows good heat transfer capacity between the fluid and the skeleton surface, the pressure drop of this structure is large resulting from its partially disconnected surface. In this paper, four TPMS structures, sheet Gyroid, solid Gyroid, solid Primitive and solid Diamond were designed and manufactured by 3D printing technology. The heat transfer performance of different TPMS structures and the fin structure was researched by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and experimental methods. The results showed that the heat dissipation capability of the fin structure was better than that of the TPMS structures under ultra-low speed airflow. Otherwise, the heat transfer performance of the solid TPMS is better than both of the sheet TPMS and the fins structures. Although the sheet TPMS has higher surface area compared to the solid TPMS, the flow speed was decreased along the internal channels leading to greater thermal resistance and lower thermal transferring efficiency. When the gas velocity was less than 4 m/s, the solid Gyroid expressed the best performance among the three solid TPMS structures caused by its higher surface area connected to the heat source. Under higher gas velocity, the solid Diamond was proved to have better performance led by higher flow speed within channels. The heat transfer coefficient of solid Diamond was 110% and 59% larger than that of the solid Primitive and the solid Gyroid, respectively. The Nusselt number of solid Diamond was 10% and 12% greater than that of the solid Primitive and the solid Gyroid, respectively. The research proves that the solid TPMS can be used to replace the fin structure in heat exchangers and provides a basis for design and optimization of TPMS-based heat exchangers in the future.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.