一项初步研究表明,在可切除的门周围胆管癌中,使用未覆盖的自膨胀金属支架进行胆道内窥镜引流存在困难。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
David M de Jong, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Wojciech G Polak, Jeroen de Jonge, Jan N M IJzermans, Michael Doukas, Roy S Dwarkasing, Marco J Bruno, Lydi M J W van Driel
{"title":"一项初步研究表明,在可切除的门周围胆管癌中,使用未覆盖的自膨胀金属支架进行胆道内窥镜引流存在困难。","authors":"David M de Jong, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Wojciech G Polak, Jeroen de Jonge, Jan N M IJzermans, Michael Doukas, Roy S Dwarkasing, Marco J Bruno, Lydi M J W van Driel","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2025.2542873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) with plastic stent placement is the standard pertaining preoperative biliary drainage for resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). Uncovered self-expanding metal stents (ucSEMS) have shown better outcomes in palliative settings. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of direct ucSEMS placement <i>via</i> ERCP for resectable pCCA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this single-centre pilot study, ten patients with presumed resectable pCCA (without prior drainage) underwent ERCP aiming to place an ucSEMS directly across the papilla into the future liver remnant (FLR). If the opposing liver segment was cannulated or had contrast injected, a stent was placed here too. Primary outcome was feasibility, defined as ucSEMS placement in the targeted liver segment without the need for additional drainage, with adequate bilirubin decrease according to the TOKYO criteria. Secondary outcomes included ERCP adverse events (AE) and successful stent removal during surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 5 of the 10 included patients, direct ucSEMS placement in the FLR was technically successful, but one required additional intervention, resulting in 40% feasibility. All patients experienced ERCP-AE (five mild, five severe). Only two patients underwent hepatectomy, one after unsuccessful ERCP and one with successful ucSEMS removal during hepatectomy. Other patients did not proceed to hepatectomy due to ERCP-related AE (<i>n</i> = 3), disease progression (<i>n</i> = 2), or unresectability upon staging (<i>n</i> = 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Direct placement of ucSEMS for resectable pCCA showed limited feasibility and high AE rates. Its routine use is not justified without further refinement and larger studies to reduce AE and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"938-948"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pilot study showcasing the difficulties in endoscopic biliary drainage using uncovered self-expanding metal stents for resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"David M de Jong, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Wojciech G Polak, Jeroen de Jonge, Jan N M IJzermans, Michael Doukas, Roy S Dwarkasing, Marco J Bruno, Lydi M J W van Driel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365521.2025.2542873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) with plastic stent placement is the standard pertaining preoperative biliary drainage for resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). Uncovered self-expanding metal stents (ucSEMS) have shown better outcomes in palliative settings. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of direct ucSEMS placement <i>via</i> ERCP for resectable pCCA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this single-centre pilot study, ten patients with presumed resectable pCCA (without prior drainage) underwent ERCP aiming to place an ucSEMS directly across the papilla into the future liver remnant (FLR). If the opposing liver segment was cannulated or had contrast injected, a stent was placed here too. Primary outcome was feasibility, defined as ucSEMS placement in the targeted liver segment without the need for additional drainage, with adequate bilirubin decrease according to the TOKYO criteria. Secondary outcomes included ERCP adverse events (AE) and successful stent removal during surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 5 of the 10 included patients, direct ucSEMS placement in the FLR was technically successful, but one required additional intervention, resulting in 40% feasibility. All patients experienced ERCP-AE (five mild, five severe). Only two patients underwent hepatectomy, one after unsuccessful ERCP and one with successful ucSEMS removal during hepatectomy. Other patients did not proceed to hepatectomy due to ERCP-related AE (<i>n</i> = 3), disease progression (<i>n</i> = 2), or unresectability upon staging (<i>n</i> = 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Direct placement of ucSEMS for resectable pCCA showed limited feasibility and high AE rates. Its routine use is not justified without further refinement and larger studies to reduce AE and improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"938-948\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2542873\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2542873","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内镜逆行胆管胰管造影(ERCP)加塑料支架置入术是可切除肝门周围胆管癌(pCCA)术前胆道引流的标准方法。未覆盖的自膨胀金属支架(ucSEMS)在姑息治疗中显示出更好的结果。本初步研究旨在评估经ERCP直接置入成功植入系统治疗可切除pCCA的可行性和安全性。材料和方法:在这项单中心试点研究中,10例假定可切除的pCCA患者(没有事先引流)接受ERCP,旨在将ucSEMS直接穿过乳头放置到未来的肝残体(FLR)中。如果对侧肝段插管或注射造影剂,此处也放置支架。主要终点是可行性,定义为ucSEMS放置在目标肝段,无需额外引流,根据TOKYO标准,胆红素下降足够。次要结局包括ERCP不良事件(AE)和手术期间支架成功移除。结果:在10例纳入的患者中,5例在FLR中直接放置ucSEMS在技术上是成功的,但1例需要额外的干预,其可行性为40%。所有患者均出现ERCP-AE(轻度5例,重度5例)。只有2例患者接受了肝切除术,1例在ERCP不成功后,1例在肝切除术期间成功切除了sems。其他患者由于ercp相关AE (n = 3)、疾病进展(n = 2)或分期后不可切除(n = 3)而未进行肝切除术。结论:ucSEMS直接置入可切除pCCA的可行性有限,AE发生率高。如果没有进一步的改进和更大规模的研究来减少AE和改善预后,常规使用是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A pilot study showcasing the difficulties in endoscopic biliary drainage using uncovered self-expanding metal stents for resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) with plastic stent placement is the standard pertaining preoperative biliary drainage for resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). Uncovered self-expanding metal stents (ucSEMS) have shown better outcomes in palliative settings. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of direct ucSEMS placement via ERCP for resectable pCCA.

Materials and methods: In this single-centre pilot study, ten patients with presumed resectable pCCA (without prior drainage) underwent ERCP aiming to place an ucSEMS directly across the papilla into the future liver remnant (FLR). If the opposing liver segment was cannulated or had contrast injected, a stent was placed here too. Primary outcome was feasibility, defined as ucSEMS placement in the targeted liver segment without the need for additional drainage, with adequate bilirubin decrease according to the TOKYO criteria. Secondary outcomes included ERCP adverse events (AE) and successful stent removal during surgery.

Results: In 5 of the 10 included patients, direct ucSEMS placement in the FLR was technically successful, but one required additional intervention, resulting in 40% feasibility. All patients experienced ERCP-AE (five mild, five severe). Only two patients underwent hepatectomy, one after unsuccessful ERCP and one with successful ucSEMS removal during hepatectomy. Other patients did not proceed to hepatectomy due to ERCP-related AE (n = 3), disease progression (n = 2), or unresectability upon staging (n = 3).

Conclusion: Direct placement of ucSEMS for resectable pCCA showed limited feasibility and high AE rates. Its routine use is not justified without further refinement and larger studies to reduce AE and improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信