类风湿关节炎患者改善疾病的抗风湿药物属性的相对重要性

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-08-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S514920
Nabin Poudel, Jingjing Qian, Kimberly B Garza, Peng Zeng, Jeffrey R Curtis, Surachat Ngorsuraches
{"title":"类风湿关节炎患者改善疾病的抗风湿药物属性的相对重要性","authors":"Nabin Poudel, Jingjing Qian, Kimberly B Garza, Peng Zeng, Jeffrey R Curtis, Surachat Ngorsuraches","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S514920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The significance of fatigue reduction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is well recognized. However, prior patient preference studies on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have not adequately explored the relative importance of fatigue reduction compared to other DMARD attributes or accounted for preference heterogeneity. The objective of this study is to determine the relative importance of DMARD attributes, including fatigue reduction, from the patient perspective.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a web-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey among RA patients in the US. Six DMARD attributes were included: chance of pain reduced by 50% or more, chance of physical function improved by 50% or more, chance of fatigue reduced by 10 points or more, chance of serious side effects, the route and frequency of administration, and out-of-pocket cost per month. Choice sets were constructed using a Bayesian efficient design. Mixed logit (ML) and latent class (LC) models were developed to determine preference weights and to calculate the conditional relative importance of each attribute.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 228 patients, the ML model showed that the chance of pain reduction had the highest conditional relative importance (2.4), followed by out-of-pocket cost (2.1), the chance of physical function improvement (1.6), the chance of fatigue reduction (1.5), the chance of experiencing serious adverse events (0.6), and the route and frequency of administration (0.09). Preference heterogeneity was observed. The LC model identified two patient classes. The chance of fatigue reduction and the out-of-pocket cost were the most important attributes for class 1 and class 2, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pain reduction, physical function improvement, fatigue reduction, and out-of-pocket cost were relatively important DMARD attributes for RA patients. However, the presence of preference heterogeneity underscores the need for individualized treatment. Future studies should explore fatigue preferences and generalizability in the broader RA population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"2319-2331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative Importance of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Attributes for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Nabin Poudel, Jingjing Qian, Kimberly B Garza, Peng Zeng, Jeffrey R Curtis, Surachat Ngorsuraches\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S514920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The significance of fatigue reduction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is well recognized. However, prior patient preference studies on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have not adequately explored the relative importance of fatigue reduction compared to other DMARD attributes or accounted for preference heterogeneity. The objective of this study is to determine the relative importance of DMARD attributes, including fatigue reduction, from the patient perspective.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a web-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey among RA patients in the US. Six DMARD attributes were included: chance of pain reduced by 50% or more, chance of physical function improved by 50% or more, chance of fatigue reduced by 10 points or more, chance of serious side effects, the route and frequency of administration, and out-of-pocket cost per month. Choice sets were constructed using a Bayesian efficient design. Mixed logit (ML) and latent class (LC) models were developed to determine preference weights and to calculate the conditional relative importance of each attribute.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 228 patients, the ML model showed that the chance of pain reduction had the highest conditional relative importance (2.4), followed by out-of-pocket cost (2.1), the chance of physical function improvement (1.6), the chance of fatigue reduction (1.5), the chance of experiencing serious adverse events (0.6), and the route and frequency of administration (0.09). Preference heterogeneity was observed. The LC model identified two patient classes. The chance of fatigue reduction and the out-of-pocket cost were the most important attributes for class 1 and class 2, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pain reduction, physical function improvement, fatigue reduction, and out-of-pocket cost were relatively important DMARD attributes for RA patients. However, the presence of preference heterogeneity underscores the need for individualized treatment. Future studies should explore fatigue preferences and generalizability in the broader RA population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"2319-2331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333635/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S514920\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S514920","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:疲劳减轻在类风湿关节炎(RA)中的意义已得到充分认识。然而,先前的患者对改善疾病的抗风湿药物(DMARD)的偏好研究没有充分探讨疲劳减轻与其他DMARD属性的相对重要性,也没有考虑到偏好的异质性。本研究的目的是从患者的角度确定DMARD属性的相对重要性,包括疲劳减轻。患者和方法:我们在美国的类风湿性关节炎患者中进行了一项基于网络的离散选择实验(DCE)调查。六个DMARD属性包括:疼痛减少50%或更多的机会,身体功能改善50%或更多的机会,疲劳减少10分或更多的机会,严重副作用的机会,给药的途径和频率,每月的自付费用。选择集的构建采用贝叶斯有效设计。开发了混合logit (ML)和潜类(LC)模型来确定偏好权重并计算每个属性的条件相对重要性。结果:在228例患者中,ML模型显示疼痛减轻的机会具有最高的条件相对重要性(2.4),其次是自付费用(2.1),身体功能改善的机会(1.6),疲劳减轻的机会(1.5),发生严重不良事件的机会(0.6),给药途径和频率(0.09)。观察到偏好异质性。LC模型确定了两类患者。减少疲劳的机会和自付费用分别是第1类和第2类最重要的属性。结论:疼痛减轻、身体功能改善、疲劳减轻和自付费用是RA患者相对重要的DMARD属性。然而,偏好异质性的存在强调了个体化治疗的必要性。未来的研究应该在更广泛的RA人群中探索疲劳偏好和普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Relative Importance of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Attributes for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Relative Importance of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Attributes for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Relative Importance of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Attributes for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Relative Importance of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Attributes for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Purpose: The significance of fatigue reduction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is well recognized. However, prior patient preference studies on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have not adequately explored the relative importance of fatigue reduction compared to other DMARD attributes or accounted for preference heterogeneity. The objective of this study is to determine the relative importance of DMARD attributes, including fatigue reduction, from the patient perspective.

Patients and methods: We conducted a web-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey among RA patients in the US. Six DMARD attributes were included: chance of pain reduced by 50% or more, chance of physical function improved by 50% or more, chance of fatigue reduced by 10 points or more, chance of serious side effects, the route and frequency of administration, and out-of-pocket cost per month. Choice sets were constructed using a Bayesian efficient design. Mixed logit (ML) and latent class (LC) models were developed to determine preference weights and to calculate the conditional relative importance of each attribute.

Results: Of 228 patients, the ML model showed that the chance of pain reduction had the highest conditional relative importance (2.4), followed by out-of-pocket cost (2.1), the chance of physical function improvement (1.6), the chance of fatigue reduction (1.5), the chance of experiencing serious adverse events (0.6), and the route and frequency of administration (0.09). Preference heterogeneity was observed. The LC model identified two patient classes. The chance of fatigue reduction and the out-of-pocket cost were the most important attributes for class 1 and class 2, respectively.

Conclusion: Pain reduction, physical function improvement, fatigue reduction, and out-of-pocket cost were relatively important DMARD attributes for RA patients. However, the presence of preference heterogeneity underscores the need for individualized treatment. Future studies should explore fatigue preferences and generalizability in the broader RA population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信