Munyoung Yang, Jongin Lee, Marty Lynch, Ross Wilkie, Martie van Tongeren, Mo-Yeol Kang
{"title":"韩国中老年人健康工作预期寿命方面的教育和性别差异。","authors":"Munyoung Yang, Jongin Lee, Marty Lynch, Ross Wilkie, Martie van Tongeren, Mo-Yeol Kang","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Understanding healthy working life expectancy (HWLE) is critical in ageing societies to promote both extended workforce participation and well-being. This study quantifies WLE and HWLE among middle-aged and older adults in Korea, stratified by gender and education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (waves 1-9, 2006-2022) to estimate WLE and HWLE at age 50 using a discrete-time 5-state Markov model. Participants were categorised based on health and work status. Education was classified into high (≥high school graduate) and low (<high school graduate) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total 72 534 responses across all waves, 69 272 came from living participants, including 29 649 men (42.8%), 39 623 women (57.2%), 28 705 responses with high education (41.4%) and 40 564 responses with low education (58.6%). Men had longer HWLE than women, despite women having higher total life expectancy. At age 50, men with high education had an HWLE of 15.13 years (95% CI 14.70 to 15.56), while those with low education had 14.25 years (95% CI: 13.60 to 14.90). Women with high education had an HWLE of 9.40 years (95% CI 8.85 to 9.95), whereas those with low education had 9.96 years (95% CI 9.43 to 10.49). Not healthy and working life expectancy (NHWLE) was longer for lower-educated individuals (men 2.26 vs 3.16 years; women 1.27 vs 3.00 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that significant disparities in WLE exist according to gender and education level, with the effect of education differing by gender.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"293-299"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational and gender disparities in healthy working life expectancy among middle-aged and older adults in South Korea.\",\"authors\":\"Munyoung Yang, Jongin Lee, Marty Lynch, Ross Wilkie, Martie van Tongeren, Mo-Yeol Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/oemed-2025-110239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Understanding healthy working life expectancy (HWLE) is critical in ageing societies to promote both extended workforce participation and well-being. This study quantifies WLE and HWLE among middle-aged and older adults in Korea, stratified by gender and education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (waves 1-9, 2006-2022) to estimate WLE and HWLE at age 50 using a discrete-time 5-state Markov model. Participants were categorised based on health and work status. Education was classified into high (≥high school graduate) and low (<high school graduate) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total 72 534 responses across all waves, 69 272 came from living participants, including 29 649 men (42.8%), 39 623 women (57.2%), 28 705 responses with high education (41.4%) and 40 564 responses with low education (58.6%). Men had longer HWLE than women, despite women having higher total life expectancy. At age 50, men with high education had an HWLE of 15.13 years (95% CI 14.70 to 15.56), while those with low education had 14.25 years (95% CI: 13.60 to 14.90). Women with high education had an HWLE of 9.40 years (95% CI 8.85 to 9.95), whereas those with low education had 9.96 years (95% CI 9.43 to 10.49). Not healthy and working life expectancy (NHWLE) was longer for lower-educated individuals (men 2.26 vs 3.16 years; women 1.27 vs 3.00 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that significant disparities in WLE exist according to gender and education level, with the effect of education differing by gender.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"293-299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110239\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:了解健康的工作预期寿命(HWLE)在老龄化社会中对于促进更多的劳动力参与和福祉至关重要。本研究量化了韩国中老年人群的WLE和HWLE,并按性别和教育程度分层。方法:我们使用韩国老龄化纵向研究(波浪1- 9,2006 -2022)的数据,使用离散时间五态马尔可夫模型估计50岁时的WLE和HWLE。参加者按健康和工作状况分类。结果:在所有波的72 534份回复中,69 272份来自在世参与者,其中男性29 649份(42.8%),女性39 623份(57.2%),高学历回复28 705份(41.4%),低学历回复40 564份(58.6%)。男性的平均寿命比女性长,尽管女性的总体预期寿命更长。在50岁时,受过高等教育的男性的HWLE为15.13年(95% CI: 14.70至15.56),而受教育程度较低的男性为14.25年(95% CI: 13.60至14.90)。受教育程度高的女性的平均寿命为9.40年(95% CI 8.85至9.95),而受教育程度低的女性为9.96年(95% CI 9.43至10.49)。受教育程度较低的人不健康和工作预期寿命(NHWLE)更长(男性2.26岁比3.16岁;女性1.27 vs 3.00)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,不同性别和教育程度的学生在工作效率上存在显著差异,且教育程度的影响因性别而异。
Educational and gender disparities in healthy working life expectancy among middle-aged and older adults in South Korea.
Objectives: Understanding healthy working life expectancy (HWLE) is critical in ageing societies to promote both extended workforce participation and well-being. This study quantifies WLE and HWLE among middle-aged and older adults in Korea, stratified by gender and education.
Methods: We used data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (waves 1-9, 2006-2022) to estimate WLE and HWLE at age 50 using a discrete-time 5-state Markov model. Participants were categorised based on health and work status. Education was classified into high (≥high school graduate) and low (
Results: Of the total 72 534 responses across all waves, 69 272 came from living participants, including 29 649 men (42.8%), 39 623 women (57.2%), 28 705 responses with high education (41.4%) and 40 564 responses with low education (58.6%). Men had longer HWLE than women, despite women having higher total life expectancy. At age 50, men with high education had an HWLE of 15.13 years (95% CI 14.70 to 15.56), while those with low education had 14.25 years (95% CI: 13.60 to 14.90). Women with high education had an HWLE of 9.40 years (95% CI 8.85 to 9.95), whereas those with low education had 9.96 years (95% CI 9.43 to 10.49). Not healthy and working life expectancy (NHWLE) was longer for lower-educated individuals (men 2.26 vs 3.16 years; women 1.27 vs 3.00 years).
Conclusions: Our findings show that significant disparities in WLE exist according to gender and education level, with the effect of education differing by gender.
期刊介绍:
Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.